Was our second offside?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Was the second goal offside?

  • Yes, clearly offside, read the fucking rule book if you think it was onside

    Votes: 190 70.1%
  • No, he wasn't interfering with play

    Votes: 81 29.9%

  • Total voters
    271

Well was it offside or not?

Here's the appropriate part of the offside law.

View attachment 155909
The "appropriate part of the law". Fuck me. We win a fucking game like that and the first thing you can think of to post is about our winning goal and what you think is "the appropriate part of the law". Jesus Fucking Christ.

You even had to Google that and take a fucking screenshot. The fucking lengths some people will go to to dish out their fucking misery.
 
Yes it was offside. No I don't care. Even if it was against us I still wouldn't want VAR. Goodman made me laugh, the linesman made a mistake, what the fuck did he want to happen by keeping bleating on about it? It's this stupid idea that officials can't make mistakes that got us VAR in the first place.
 
With VAR probably.

It's only because it's close to sander. If it's a shot to top corner it isn't. But yeah probably was.

That said we would have kept on pushing if we hadn't got that goal.
 
The "appropriate part of the law". Fuck me. We win a fucking game like that and the first thing you can think of to post is about our winning goal and what you think is "the appropriate part of the law". Jesus Fucking Christ.

You even had to Google that and take a fucking screenshot. The fucking lengths some people will go to to dish out their fucking misery.
Exactly. Im more bothered about that assault on jebbo just being a yellow.
 

It probably was offside but the way Don Twatchops was going off you would have thought it was the worst decision seen in football. It was still debatable. But the record books say it was a goal. We all have shit decisions given against us throughout the season so soak it up Sunlun and Twatchops
 
It probably was offside but the way Don Twatchops was going off you would have thought it was the worst decision seen in football. It was still debatable. But the record books say it was a goal. We all have shit decisions given against us throughout the season so soak it up Sunlun and Twatchops
Remember standing on the kop when that cnut played for bradford and headed a ball over benstead and it bounced then went over the bar...cue wanker signs to the big boofheaded cnut.
 

Yes. Berge attempts to play the ball. And the rule makes sense because in instances like that it impacts whether the keeper can follow the path of the ball or has to remain more central in case the player takes a shot. There shouldn't be a debate to be had.

But I don't give a fuck that it stood. I needed that.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom