VAR ruled this offside...

[SwitchBLADE Smiles]

WTF??

Get this shit out of my game.

 

[DiggerBlade]

VAR is killing the game.

The match officials on the pitch gave it as good enough end of.

 

[BladeInIreland]

Don't get how anybody can think it is good for the game.

 

[SuperBobbyHatton]

Absolute bollox, wasnt even in the same phase of play.

 

[FATTYFOULKE]

Spent 3 minutes looking at it. Thought it was supposed to be “clear and obvious”

It’s killing the game.

 

[SwissBlade]

Letter of the law - correct...

but when it takes nearly 4 mins you’ve killed both sides momentum

VAR is not for me

 

[BladeinCottingham]

The linesman couldn’t be closer....... benefit of doubt should always go towards the attacking team. I wonder if it would have been ruled off it it was Liverpool, spurs or Man City???

 

[FATTYFOULKE]

Letter of the law - correct...

but when it takes nearly 4 mins you’ve killed both sides momentum

VAR is not for me

Surely the Tottenham players head and shoulder is playing him on anyway?

 

[bladevisitor]

Absolute bollox, wasnt even in the same phase of play.

frustrating but the rule need to be clear i.e. need to limit to last phase or at most last 2 phase of plays.

 

[s4-blade]

Blatant cheating

 

[SwitchBLADE Smiles]

At best, this is indeterminable. So because they're not sure if Lundstrams toe is 3mm offside, it's given offside & no benefit of the doubt is given to the attacking team.

It's complete bollocks & not how it should be used.

 

[Tony_Kaufman]

Looks like the ear is playing his toe onside to me as his ear is further ahead than his knee.

The FA need to address this and stop looking for reasons to disallow goals through bullshit four minute reviews.

VAR could be good, but not the way they're using it.

 

[SwissBlade]

Surely the Tottenham players head and shoulder is playing him on anyway?

Hmm I didn’t think that, co commentator questioned it... not grumbling at the decision. Just the impact on the game

 

[Klaatu Barada Nikto]

The linesman couldn’t be closer....... benefit of doubt should always go towards the attacking team. I wonder if it would have been ruled off it it was Liverpool, spurs or Man City???

Spurs got a ridiculous one ruled out against Leicester.

 

[Yellarbellyblade]

Looks like the ear is playing his toe onside to me as his ear is further ahead than his knee.

The FA need to address this and stop looking for reasons to disallow goals through bullshit four minute reviews.

VAR could be good, but not the way they're using it.

This.

What exactly is football all about remind me. Why make it even less likely we see goals?

 

[Geezer]

when

Disagree. No advantage has been gained.

 

[Tony_Kaufman]

VAR should get 60 seconds to review. If they can't come to a decision then the referee makes the call on the pitch.

 

[Tony_Kaufman]

5th in the Premier League. Take a bow boys, take a bow.

 

[rosy red]

We was robbed, good point but

 

[metalblade]

Utter bollocks that

 

[Bladebri]

On goals it has to be black or white, clear and obvious doesn’t come into it with goals, but for me that is legal at best, if you look at the black line it cuts across the defenders sholder, it’s a goal for me.

 

[Bladebri]

Level

 

[haich1889]

 

[tomtheblade]

Surely the Tottenham players head and shoulder is playing him on anyway?

I think the way it's determined is by drawing a line from the body directly down to the pitch. If you do that with his head and shoulder then they're behind the line, so not playing him onside.

Still a ridiculous decision for other reasons though.

 

[Luke1993]

No problem with it being offside. IF, they have measured it correctly. however, looking at all the pictures, they've used diers knee as the reference point, but his shoulder looks further back than his knee. At what point do they look and think hang on I think we might not be using this correctly.

 

[metalblade]

Looks like the defenders shoulder is nearer the goal than our players foot.

 

[Bruce Wayne]

FUCK VAR

 

[Geordie Blade]

Spurs got a ridiculous one ruled out against Leicester.

And Man City had a daft one ruled out on the opening day. It’s not biased, but it is certainly flawed.

 

[JohnDenver]

Against Soton var knocked us back. Today we had balls like watermelons.

 

[haich1889]

No problem with it being offside. IF, they have measured it correctly. however, looking at all the pictures, they've used diers knee as the reference point, but his shoulder looks further back than his knee. At what point do they look and think hang on I think we might not be using this correctly.

Thing is how on earth can that be described as clear & obvious. Clear & obvious doesn't take 5 mins
Cheated for me