Transfer targets

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Can, but......




No, there is - it would just need us to bring in two decent young attacking players on permanent deals, reinvesting an acceptable amount of what we'll get for Brooks.

Actually, on second thoughts, you're right. That's not a realistic scenario is it...

Why are we more likely to spend that money during this transfer window than any other?
 

Doubt it's Marriott as looking down Nixon's previous tweets he says Peterborough want 6.5 million for him.

They won't get £6.5m for him. That's their initial asking price. You don't sell a house and ask for what you will accept as a minimum do you? You ask for more knowing that you will.probably have to come down in price to clinch the sale.
 
I disagree.

I think it's a good point to make when surrounded by drama queens complaining about a signing we haven't even made yet.

It may well be a good point but it’s hardly insightful ....

Hardly causing drama as you quietly point out it’s hardly insightful to point out that the current squad is worse than it was. What you call drama some would call fact.
 
I assume Nixon reads this board.
 
Got to feel for the poor bastards having to watch that useless lummox every week.

I'd imagine it to be a bit like a freak circus show.

"Come one, come all. Roll up and witness a display of such abject uselessness that he couldn't even hack it at Partick Thistle. Gasp as his shot from three yards away takes out a part of the ISS, be amazed as he gets beaten in the air by Otto, the smallest Grasshopper in existence."
 
Would you not agrrr that if McGoldrick & Gregory are replacements for Evans and Donaldson, then the squad would be stronger?

Who would you prefer us to sign, if they aren't your preffered choices?

Given whatever the apparent financial restraints seem to be, I'd personally see McGoldrick & Gregory as an upgrade on Evans & Donaldson.
 
Definitely not Marriot. Doubt Posh will get 6.5 but they will definitely get more than 4. Nixon's language suggests we are below 4
 
I assume Nixon reads this board.

I understand people are eager for transfer news, especially at this stage, I just never get the hanging on every word of Nixon who has always been cryptic and unreliable.
 
It may well be a good point but it’s hardly insightful ....

Hardly causing drama as you quietly point out it’s hardly insightful to point out that the current squad is worse than it was. What you call drama some would call fact.

I'm not going to decend into semantics with you, call it what you like.
And should I call them fact queens rather than drama queens then?
 

Maybe it's a Johnny Russell type bid :cool:
 
Its Welbeck, after hearing Arsenal could be about to let him leave the Blades were quick of the mark with a bid close to their record.


Unfortunately the Arsenal board haven't stopped laughing yet to give us their answer.

We tried for a few but
 
Go on then. Where am I wrong? :)

McGoldrick and Gregory are obviously a HUGE upgrade on Ched and Lavery. Anyone who argues otherwise possibly needs locking up for their own safety. Doesn't mean they're the players we need though.
 
He says it has a chance to go through. He has also stated in past we have a wage structure in place that means struggle to get Gallagher etc.

Sounds positive. Gives us something to talk about on way to Bradford.
 
Nahki Wells anyone? Burnley paid 5 million for him last year and he hardly had a sniff?

Not claiming to be ITK, just all the numbers add up and he is someone in range

I'd love to think we've enquired about him. Scored goals at this level, good age, bags of pace.

He's clearly not going to cut it for Burnley in the Prem, so I'd be surprised if they weren't looking to loan him out, & wages shouldn't be too high. Would be a great addition.
 
McGoldrick and Gregory are obviously a HUGE upgrade on Ched and Lavery. Anyone who argues otherwise possibly needs locking up for their own safety. Doesn't mean they're the players we need though.

I never said they were a huge upgrade.

I never said anything about anyone who argued otherwise.

I never said they were players we needed.


I did say that McGoldrick and Gregory are an upgrade on Evans and Donaldson.

I also said there are a lot of drama queens getting upset by a signing we have yet to make.
 

I never said they were a huge upgrade.

I never said anything about anyone who argued otherwise.

I never said they were players we needed.


I did say that McGoldrick and Gregory are an upgrade on Evans and Donaldson.

I also said there are a lot of drama queens getting upset by a signing we have yet to make.

Not actually disagreeing with you.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom