Tommy Doyle

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

I just don't rate Tommy Doyle as much as so many others on this forum do.
I haven't been shocked to see him not kick on at PL level with Wolves.

He only really played well for a couple of months at the end of his season on loan with us.
He has some decent attributes, but lacks in physical and athletic terms.

I said in the second post on this thread that I was opposed to bringing him back as Peck was progressing so well and I standby it.
tomny doyle is a better midfielder than peck imo if weve any chance of getting him we should be all over it
 

Yep. We need Vini sized footballers with ability.
If Vini could pass and shoot like Doyle he'd be worth £80m. We're never going to get perfection. Every now and then we might stumble across a gem like we did with Ndiaye, but that's what? A once in 30 years event?

Rest of the time we can only bring in players that are available to us and try to mould them together into a team
 
If Vini could pass and shoot like Doyle he'd be worth £80m. We're never going to get perfection. Every now and then we might stumble across a gem like we did with Ndiaye, but that's what? A once in 30 years event?

Rest of the time we can only bring in players that are available to us and try to mould them together into a team
100% this.
 
He will fit in nicely at Sunderland,i think thats where he will be going.
Would be a bad career move if he listens to his manager at wolves. As stated he is a good player but needs to be in a team that controls possession, just csbt see that at Sunderland.

Also Sunderland are a young small side... wasnt it mentioned that doyle is also not built like a prem player (ie 6ft4 and athletically built), no one at Sunderland really fits that billing either - baring Ballard (who's only about 6ft1/2).
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom