BornOnShorehamStreet
Well-Known Member
Baldocks imminent return is the only saving grace. We're nothing down the right and even less in defence.
Except it's been imminent for a few games now hasn't it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Baldocks imminent return is the only saving grace. We're nothing down the right and even less in defence.
Coutts is too easy an excuse. If non of the lads can suitably fill in then obviously a replacement will need to be found but the rest of the lads need to have a word with themselves. Were the furthest from a one man team iv ever seen us be and Coutts injury is not a good enough excuse for the drop in performances. Iv no doubt Wilder will at least keep us up there until January where he needs to be backed. But our defense are letting themselves down and I hope baldock being back will steady things up by bringing basham back in the middle. Personally I'd change the back 3 to the old team of bash, JOC and wright and even possibly switch moore back in.
Changing the team too much and too often is precisely the problem.
Not been convinced by him since he arrived. A couple of half decent games but several poor ones. He seems to make several mistakes every game.
I’d go with giving Fleck the Coutts role. Not sure about Bash in midfield, I know he played there at the sty but Coutts ran the midfield that day, he isn’t there now and Bash could looked a bit exposed there now.
Made a good save in the first half to his left, don't think he was at fault for the goals. Regarding Stearman I thought he had a decent first game back.Agree Moore should come in, everything that goes at Jamal seems to go in, he's also not a talker, we need that leadership from the GK the way the defence are leaking silly goals.
no teeaks necessary .. back to basics. last seasons winning line up. enda can stay in lundstrum for coutts.. i’d even consider lafferty at right back at least he understands the systemAt the moment it's just a bad run. I don't think whole sale changes are needed at all. A few tweaks are necessary mainly having a genuine right back fit and taking Carter Vickers out. Solving the Coutts conundrum is obviously the most difficult thing. I don't think Lundstram did bad at all today but he's not adding enough creativity or protecting the back 4 enough right now. I think our options at the moment are playing Fleck in the Coutts role and Carruthurs given a go or Basham in midfield and a slight change of play that helps protect the back 4.
Except it's been imminent for a few games now hasn't it?
Yeah im not sold with Basham in the middle either but he would offer us energy and strength which we lack at the moment.
To be honest I think that the right back issue is perhaps as big as the Coutts thing. Basham puts everything in to it but positionally he gets caught out and without a ball winner in midfield it means we are easy to break against. I would like to see how we fare with Baldock back before thinking about changing systems
I don't think it's a case of being a one man team but of having no proper replacement. Take one cog out of a machine and it'll cease to work, even though it's just a cog.
Made a good save in the first half to his left, don't think he was at fault for the goals. Regarding Stearman I thought he had a decent first game back.
changing last years team has been the problem with the notable exception of Enda.. ccv.. lundstrum and stearman simply haven’t fitted in
This is a big factor.Baldocks imminent return is the only saving grace. We're nothing down the right and even less in defence.
ridiculous comment.. i was merely stating factSo what do we do play Coutts & Freeman in a pot ?
I the fact is without Coutts we've not won against three teams we'd have expected to beat..
Fair play to the pigs, to be that shit after spending so much money takes some doing.Says it all, pig neighbour is happy because they've got a point against Hull and we've lost.
I've not seen today's game or the highlights but this is useless usage of bad stats - did Blackman have a chance with any of them? Were the shots taken high percentage chances or speculative efforts?They only had 4 shots on target though and scored 3, conversion rate of shots on target against us is too high.
I deal in facts not emotion and the fact is without Coutts we've not won against three teams we'd have expected to beat....
In Tufty I trust, but he needs to start scheming a solution...
Fair play to the pigs, to be that shit after spending so much money takes some doing.
No more ridiculous than ignoring that the2 most significant changes are down to them wearing said potsridiculous comment.. i was merely stating fact
i’m not writing anyone off at all i think you have decided i am trying to blame someone.. what i am trying to say is that when ‘that’ 11 dont play for whatever reason, we aren’t as good.. why is that? ( genuine question)No more ridiculous than ignoring that the2 most significant changes are down to them wearing said pots
How many games has Stearman played to warrant being written off?
Baldock has looked better than Freeman
Should Brooke's get a look in ?
The reality is that enforced changes have disrupted us (Coutts out/ Bash --> RB) coupled with oposition looking to counteract our strengths ( exploit lesser strengths eg lack of pace) ref Fulham counter attacking @ pace ;/ Brum defending desperately / superbly ;M/wall out working us
no need to panic! We weren't very good today, but we were in a false position, we don't have the strength and depth to continue staying top two. But could give a good go at top six, which would be a fantastic achievement. So, as hard as it is to lose, we have to get behind the team. They are trying there best.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?