Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Davies fit? Are you having a laugh??If Davies and Shackleton are fit and we still have Hamer and Blaster we should send him out until
January
I'd rather he stayed.He's already proved he's more than good enough as cover= DO NOT SEND OUT.
Against wrexham's second stringHe's already proved he's more than good enough as cover= DO NOT SEND OUT.
I'd rather he stayed.
But he could stay as cover and only get meaningless minutes off the bench and a cup game against a league 1 team. Or he could start every game for a league 1 team. Clearly that would further his development as a player more than staying and give us more information as to the player he is and his potential.
Completely understand and your rationale is good, but of the bits I've seen he looks wll capable and with a bit of luck he'll force a starting place.I'd rather he stayed.
But he could stay as cover and only get meaningless minutes off the bench and a cup game against a league 1 team. Or he could start every game for a league 1 team. Clearly that would further his development as a player more than staying and give us more information as to the player he is and his potential.
If Davies and Shackleton are fit and we still have Hamer and Blaster we should send him out until
January
Because he will get better / quicker with more game time than he would with the occasional appearance off the benchWhy loan out a class player
Had a David Brooks feel to it.Why loan out a class player
For experience, he'll get minutes with us this season but much more game time with a loanWhy loan out a class player
Didn't do Arblaster any harm going to Port Vale for a few months
Definitely, feels like this might be the position we are lightest in. Correct me if I am wrong but we have:Do you think CW might see Shackleton as our RB?
So much for new owner investment. Already flogging the assets we have. Not a good sign if true.Just heard from a previously very reliable source that it's likely we lose Peck in the summer, even if we go up.
Importantly, and the reason my contact told me....the owners think he is our best opportunity to cash in to improve the squad. Blaster was 'the one' from an asset value POV, but his injury has put the brakes on that. Sydie is seen as the one we can sell and get a net squad improvement
- Prem: He's considered behind Vini and Blaster, so isn't guaranteed many minutes, so he would rather be at a club training with better players and not playing much, than sat training with us and not playing much.
- Champ: he thinks he's ready to move up and continue his growth, even if we lost Vini and he was guaranteed minutes. Trajectory momentum is seen as key in young players, and he wants to continue that, jumping while his trajectory is high
I don't blame him. He's been fantastic for us this season, and from nowhere really, and I wish him well. We will get great money for him and maybe one day we smile as he smashes it on the biggest stage, as we play on a slightly lesser stage
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?