3Cheers4Ramirez
Hip hip...
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2019
- Messages
- 5,265
- Reaction score
- 8,218
No it wouldn't!Think I'd rather "cash in" on Anel and Souza first which would be 30m - 40m.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
No it wouldn't!Think I'd rather "cash in" on Anel and Souza first which would be 30m - 40m.
So much for new owner investment. Already flogging the assets we have. Not a good sign if true.
Hopefully your contact is wrong.
That said you could argue sell Souza and pair Peck and Arblaster at the top level if we go up.
I also think if we went up we need to move to 4-3-3 which would newb they could all play. Wilder reenforced midfield before when promoted.
Had a nice brief chat with him and then a slightly longer one with his dad after the game on Friday.Just heard from a previously very reliable source that it's likely we lose Peck in the summer, even if we go up.
Importantly, and the reason my contact told me....the owners think he is our best opportunity to cash in to improve the squad. Blaster was 'the one' from an asset value POV, but his injury has put the brakes on that. Sydie is seen as the one we can sell and get a net squad improvement
- Prem: He's considered behind Vini and Blaster, so isn't guaranteed many minutes, so he would rather be at a club training with better players and not playing much, than sat training with us and not playing much.
- Champ: he thinks he's ready to move up and continue his growth, even if we lost Vini and he was guaranteed minutes. Trajectory momentum is seen as key in young players, and he wants to continue that, jumping while his trajectory is high
I don't blame him. He's been fantastic for us this season, and from nowhere really, and I wish him well. We will get great money for him and maybe one day we smile as he smashes it on the biggest stage, as we play on a slightly lesser stage
Transfer fee with add ons would get us around 30m you'd like to think. Good ages with pedigree abroad I reckon someone would take a punt on them.No it wouldn't!
Cooper 12 milSydie Peck - £15m
Michael Cooper - £12m
Gustavo Hamer - £12m
Anel Ahmedhodzic - £10m
Vini Souza - £12m
Id be surprised if we're not receiving bids for all of them if we don't go up.
There'd be a serious prospect of losing all of them.
Agree that they could all go but I expect to receive at least 25% more than the figures quoted, with bolt ons in addition.Sydie Peck - £15m
Michael Cooper - £12m
Gustavo Hamer - £12m
Anel Ahmedhodzic - £10m
Vini Souza - £12m
Id be surprised if we're not receiving bids for all of them if we don't go up.
There'd be a serious prospect of losing all of them.
I’d be very surprised if they have a buy back clause. He was out of contract and decided to not sign a new one and to leave the club, he then went on trial at some clubs before ending up with us. Whoever picked him up would have had to pay Arsenal for his youth registration which they will have still held, and we supposedly paid £150k for that. Can’t see how Arsenal would have been in a negotiating position as he was technically a free agent with just the fee for his youth registration needed.Arsenal can go fuck themselves with their buy back clause. They have already fucked us over with the Ramsdale deal.
This is the only bit of your post I disagree with. They are different types of player. If Blaster hadn’t been injured Peck would have been competing with Souza for a place, not with Blaster. Our ideal midfield two is Blaster with either Souza or Peck. Without Blaster our creative and attacking edge is dulled & Peck hasn’t been able to compensate for that because that isn’t his game. Nor has Souza for the same reason.Right now, Blaster is behind Peck and there should be no rush to bring Blaster back in.
Yeah that’s fair, it was more in relation to him being behind Blaster and Souza. I actually think Peck and Blaster would be a very complimentary partnership if we got them playing togetherThis is the only bit of your post I disagree with. They are different types of player. If Blaster hadn’t been injured Peck would have been competing with Souza for a place, not with Blaster. Our ideal midfield two is Blaster with either Souza or Peck. Without Blaster our creative and attacking edge is dulled & Peck hasn’t been able to compensate for that because that isn’t his game. Nor has Souza for the same reason.
I agree that there’s no rush to bring Blaster back in but when he does return then based on recent form & trajectory he would be replacing Souza, not Peck.
Cooper 12 mil
Completely agree with this. I have said exactly the same but had no reply yetI’d be very surprised if they have a buy back clause. He was out of contract and decided to not sign a new one and to leave the club, he then went on trial at some clubs before ending up with us. Whoever picked him up would have had to pay Arsenal for his youth registration which they will have still held, and we supposedly paid £150k for that. Can’t see how Arsenal would have been in a negotiating position as he was technically a free agent with just the fee for his youth registration needed.
I don't think Peck would ever be on the radar of champions league sides tbh..Arsenal can go fuck themselves with their buy back clause. They have already fucked us over with the Ramsdale deal.
Sydie Peck - £15m
Michael Cooper - £12m
Gustavo Hamer - £12m
Anel Ahmedhodzic - £10m
Vini Souza - £12m
Id be surprised if we're not receiving bids for all of them if we don't go up.
There'd be a serious prospect of losing all of them.
Sydie Peck - £15m
Michael Cooper - £12m
Gustavo Hamer - £12m
Anel Ahmedhodzic - £10m
Vini Souza - £12m
Id be surprised if we're not receiving bids for all of them if we don't go up.
There'd be a serious prospect of losing all of them.
Add another 10m to cooperSydie Peck - £15m
Michael Cooper - £12m
Gustavo Hamer - £12m
Anel Ahmedhodzic - £10m
Vini Souza - £12m
Id be surprised if we're not receiving bids for all of them if we don't go up.
There'd be a serious prospect of losing all of them.
Doubt that, if he'd got a goal scoring record, then it might be different, basically he doesn't score. Another season to improve on that, then who knows.Had a nice brief chat with him and then a slightly longer one with his dad after the game on Friday.
The skys the limit really for Peck, he’s come from being further down the order to getting a chance and taking it with both hands since Blasters injury.
Right now, Blaster is behind Peck and there should be no rush to bring Blaster back in.
Peck has improved throughout a very long hard season, matured in his performances and just needs to add goals into his game.
His dad seemed very happy with him being at United and I’m not sure they’ll be forcing the move as they realise the time and effort United have put into his development
If he’s to stay then he needs a decent contract to reflect his status as one of the divisions top midfielders but if he is to be sold then it’ll be for the right money, again commensurate with his status. I don’t think there is a right or wrong way to handle it to be honest. We’ll benefit either way
Personally I’d love to see him stay and take us forwards along with the likes of Blaster
Agree that they could all go but I expect to receive at least 25% more than the figures quoted, with bolt ons in addition.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?