Samuel Has His Say

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Do you know that they havent ?

So all these people HAVE been to the police with their conclusive proof the girl is lying (and not one of them has mentioned it, given they are so interested in local justice).... AND the police have not done a single thing to investigate all of these cast-iron claims?

All a bit far-fetched isn't it?
 

So all these people HAVE been to the police with their conclusive proof the girl is lying (and not one of them has mentioned it, given they are so interested in local justice).... AND the police have not done a single thing to investigate all of these cast-iron claims?

All a bit far-fetched isn't it?
Maybe the police will be investigating if they now have evidence ,it sounds like they may have a lot on their plate at the moment. This will not quietly die away though in my opinion.
 
Maybe the police will be investigating if they now have evidence ,it sounds like they may have a lot on their plate at the moment. This will not quietly die away though in my opinion.

I am afraid you are barking up the wrong tree. The alleged offence happend May 2011. The trial was nearly a year later. You can bet your life Ched's lawyers sent people to Rhyl to see if there was any evidence the complainant had said to anyone it wasn't true (and she had almost a year to say it). No such evidence emerged at trial and the idea that the complainant will now say it wasn't true, which could lead her to being charged with perjury, is, as the chap above says, somewhat far fetched.
 
Maybe this is what the appeal is based on ,the new evidence ,rather than the judges summing up ?
 
People must have their blinkers on this morning as I can find a couple of things which are poor researching / journalism.

Firstly he says "
Many of those crying freedom loudest do not base their views on a painstaking analysis of the minutiae of the case, either; they want Evans released because he is their man and it will benefit their club. Any argument is then tailored to fit that agenda."

What a load of rubbish. Many Blades who are supporting Ched are doing so because an innocent man has been convicted for rape. Also, any Blade fan would know that Ched's contract is up at the end of season and the chances were high that we would leave for another team who could support his wages. So saying we are only supporting him because he plays for us is just rubbish.

 
Also, any Blade fan would know that Ched's contract is up at the end of season and the chances were high that we would leave for another team who could support his wages. So saying we are only supporting him because he plays for us is just rubbish.


Sadly, quite a few idiots seem to think a retrial would be done and dusted before the game at exeter. But i take the general point you're making.​
 
I will bet you twenty zillion zillion pounds it isn't.

Just a personal question. If you can't get any feedback from the jury on why you didn't win a case, how do you go about reviewing your performance? If you had a similar case next time, how would you know what areas you could work on?
 
"not all Sheffield United fans are supporting him" if the fat Daily Fail biggot had bothered to look 90% of all messages have strongly criticised Evans. It's just the slight insinuation
 
The bloke has got such an agenda against SUFC, I cannot believe that there are people on here who think it is a balanced and fair article. How many times has he mentioned SUFC over the last 4 or five years in his national column? This is a bloke who writes for a national newspaper with a large daily circulation, whose sport section is interested only in covering Manchester United, Manchester City, Arsenal, Liverpool, Chelsea and Spurs.

Yet despite that, our club, an unfashionable, sometimes unpopular northern club that has won nowt for 87 years, and done nowt for the past 5 years, has managed several mentions in this national newspaper column in that time. I wonder why that is?
 
Yet despite that, our club, an unfashionable, sometimes unpopular northern club that has won nowt for 87 years, and done nowt for the past 5 years, has managed several mentions in this national newspaper column in that time. I wonder why that is?

Because we keep getting mixed up in newsworthy stories.
 

That pesky Steven Kabba affair...
 
Samuels' wider point on Kabba - that PL teams should not be allowed to loan players to teams in the same division - was bang on.
 
Maybe the police will be investigating if they now have evidence ,it sounds like they may have a lot on their plate at the moment. This will not quietly die away though in my opinion.

Say it slowly after me Sitters - Ched Evans is a rapist.

Re this 'local justice' you need to get away from the good people of Rhyl's thinking that because she has a history or whatever it is you are getting at then Ched cannot be guilty of rape. 'Local Justice' would have the victime strung up and the likes of you parading Ched as an Alpha Male Super Hero.
 
Say it slowly after me Sitters - Ched Evans is a rapist.

Re this 'local justice' you need to get away from the good people of Rhyl's thinking that because she has a history or whatever it is you are getting at then Ched cannot be guilty of rape. 'Local Justice' would have the victime strung up and the likes of you parading Ched as an Alpha Male Super Hero.

Were you one of the guys at the window Mic?
 
heh.. sorry but i'm not buying it.. you've all been duped.. it is a sneaky dig at us by a discredited journalist.. if it had been a west ham player he'd have never reported it.. next article.. why stephen quinn should not be in the team of the year because a. he is ginger and b. plays for sheffield united
 
Samuel not talking shite this week then that is a first.
 
People must have their blinkers on this morning as I can find a couple of things which are poor researching / journalism.

Firstly he says "
Many of those crying freedom loudest do not base their views on a painstaking analysis of the minutiae of the case, either; they want Evans released because he is their man and it will benefit their club. Any argument is then tailored to fit that agenda."


What a load of rubbish. Many Blades who are supporting Ched are doing so because an innocent man has been convicted for rape.
You talk as if this is stated fact rather than just your opinion on a man who has been convicted. You are oddly confident for a bystander who knows nothing more than the rest of us. You also say many. Really? I see a gobby few but its the usual minority making a lot of noise while the rest of us get on with life.​
 
Yet despite that, our club, an unfashionable, sometimes unpopular northern club that has won nowt for 87 years, and done nowt for the past 5 years, has managed several mentions in this national newspaper column in that time. I wonder why that is?

Because we keep getting mixed up in newsworthy stories.
As did 'forever blowin bubbles' with tevez,don't seem to remember anything from him about that. Not that I generally read any of that sh@t.
 
A decent article from the fat spammer who should know better than anyone about supporting as he puts it rapists, thugs and CHEATS............ I seem to remember him supporting a well known set of cheats a few years back very vociferously ............... Fat Wanker
 
"not all Sheffield United fans are supporting him" if the fat Daily Fail biggot had bothered to look 90% of all messages have strongly criticised Evans. It's just the slight insinuation

90%? I don't think so. I've heard more criticism of Ched on here than anywhere else but even on here in the "Stand by Ched" vote, 66% said they would stand by him, at least until after the appeal.

I still think the verdict was flawed & I've heard or read nothing to convince me Ched was guilty. And I'm still grateful for Ched's contribution this season - we'd be mid-table without him.
 

I can't believe the majority on here can't see this for what it is, he blames the entire twitter issue on Blades fans and in the last three paragraphs he basically paints us all as rapist sympathisers. He is setting us up, if there is any significant support for Ched this weekend his article will come at us next week with both barrels. He will big himself up stating how he foresaw events and drag the club through the mud. Due to the lazy standards of journalism his view will become the accepted truth and we will again be on the back foot, the social pariahs.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom