Referee

[Ndiayewillalwaysloveyou]

No penalty on Brooks after his shot saved?

 

[JT89]

No penalty on Brooks after his shot saved?

These ones are always weird, if that happens anywhere else on the pitch it’s a late tackle and foul. But when it’s in the penalty area the focus always seem to be on whether or not the player who’s fouled has still got their shot off and if they have they’re rarely given as a penalty

 

[Selly]

These ones are always weird, if that happens anywhere else on the pitch it’s a late tackle and foul. But when it’s in the penalty area the focus always seem to be on whether or not the player who’s fouled has still got their shot off and if they have they’re rarely given as a penalty

Unless you are Steven Gerrard of course...

 

[espoo blade]

No penalty on Brooks after his shot saved?

Yep, anywhere else on the pitch that's a foul and a red, but because he's got his shot off it's somehow different?

EDIT: Just seen that JT89 has replied exactly the same. Red card for me.

 

[chesblade]

How did he only give a yellow for the punch in the face on Gus

 

[Bladesman]

How did he only give a yellow for the punch in the face on Gus

Gus had the wrong shirt on.

 

[Rufus Smalls]

How did he only give a yellow for the punch in the face on Gus

Because he basically isn't a competent referee.

 

[Davalon]

I'm not a fan of the obsession with fans always blaming the refs for everything and talking conspiracies.

However, I have to confess I've yet to see a game officiated by Mr Allison where I've thought he looked up to the standard required. Probably the most damning indictment on him is that he's often been criticised by both sides after a game.

 

[Chimes]

No penalty on Brooks after his shot saved?

Really shocking decision. Not only is it a foul in its own right, but even if the ref argued (wrongly) that he got his shot away, Brooks can't get to the rebound because he's been cleared out. Blatant penalty.

 

[1973Blade]

I think he got the big decisions right, but it makes a change to watch a match and think we got the better of the decisions!

 

[JT89]

I think he got the big decisions right, but it makes a change to watch a match and think we got the better of the decisions!

Might be time to take the bladeyblade glasses off. He was utterly useless for both sides.

 

[Bladesman]

I think he got the big decisions right, but it makes a change to watch a match and think we got the better of the decisions!

Well I was wondering when a pen or a red card would go in our favour.

I thought Wilder's card was marked with most match officials.

 

[CPB]

If Lundstram can feel hard done to. It's for his first yellow. I'm not sure he really did anything there.

2nd one yes ref impeded him but he still had the option to not lunge in. It wasnt dreadful but was a booking.

Pen I'm not sure which one it was given for. 3 of ours end up on the floor. Can't tell if any were penalties given the footage. You'd think one was though. Really daft from Hulls point of view though.

 

[LBA_Blade]

If Lundstram can feel hard done to. It's for his first yellow. I'm not sure he really did anything there.

2nd one yes ref impeded him but he still had the option to not lunge in. It wasnt dreadful but was a booking.

Pen I'm not sure which one it was given for. 3 of ours end up on the floor. Can't tell if any were penalties given the footage. You'd think one was though. Really daft from Hulls point of view though.

Don’t know if Knill has been planning but it’s a good technique to force the referee into a decision

 

[djbaldken]

If Lundstram can feel hard done to. It's for his first yellow. I'm not sure he really did anything there.

2nd one yes ref impeded him but he still had the option to not lunge in. It wasnt dreadful but was a booking.

Pen I'm not sure which one it was given for. 3 of ours end up on the floor. Can't tell if any were penalties given the footage. You'd think one was though. Really daft from Hulls point of view though.

He did. He trod on McGuiness s ankle ,debatable as to if it was deliberate, but it could have been. Obviously McGuiness was upset. Hence the handbags.

 

[fifty shades of blade]

If Lundstram can feel hard done to. It's for his first yellow. I'm not sure he really did anything there.

2nd one yes ref impeded him but he still had the option to not lunge in. It wasnt dreadful but was a booking.

Pen I'm not sure which one it was given for. 3 of ours end up on the floor. Can't tell if any were penalties given the footage. You'd think one was though. Really daft from Hulls point of view though.

The boz eyed scouse lummox deserved a straight red for studding brooks's ankle.

 

[1889]

He did. He trod on McGuiness s ankle ,debatable as to if it was deliberate, but it could have been. Obviously McGuiness was upset. Hence the handbags.

In my experience things like that on the football field are very rarely ‘accidental’ deserved his yellow

 

[Maidenhead]

Might be time to take the bladeyblade glasses off. He was utterly useless for both sides.

I actually thought he was ok. I thought Lundstam's second yellow was nailed on and other than that I never really noticed him until the corner before the penalty when he warned them about grappling when Tanganga was wrestled to the ground, and then gave a penalty which could have been for one of several similar incidents.

I'd actually said before the game that I'd take a few seven all draws on penalties if it stopped all the shenanigans at corners.

 

[JT89]

I actually thought he was ok.

Have you considered watching other sports? I don't think football is for you.

 

[Maidenhead]

Have you considered watching other sports? I don't think football is for you.

So come on then, what specifically do you think he got wrong?

 

[JT89]

So come on then, what specifically do you think he got wrong?

Off the top of my head;

He got numerous decisions wrong throughout.

He got in the way of players from both sides numerous times, one of which lead to their red card, Peck complained about him getting in his way at least twice amongst other times.

He stopped at least 2 decent counter-attacks for Hull by failing to play obvious advantages.

 

[chesblade]

He was a prem ref so should be better than championship ones

 

[Maidenhead]

Off the top of my head;

He got numerous decisions wrong throughout.

He got in the way of players from both sides numerous times, one of which lead to their red card, Peck complained about him getting in his way at least twice amongst other times.

He stopped at least 2 decent counter-attacks for Hull by failing to play obvious advantages.

Lots of generalisation and opinion there but no specifics.

I happen to have a different opinion.

Suck it up and stop being so rude.

 

[CPB]

He did. He trod on McGuiness s ankle ,debatable as to if it was deliberate, but it could have been. Obviously McGuiness was upset. Hence the handbags.

When I've seen that one back it just didn't look like anything was in that. Looked like he was just trying to go over him and McGuinness grabs his ankle.

2nd one is a yellow though for me. Don't care that the ref is in the way at first. He catches him late. He doesn't have to "Lundge" in.

 

[JT89]

Lots of generalisation and opinion there but no specifics.

I happen to have a different opinion.

Suck it up and stop being so rude.

Sorry I didn't take notes of specific ref errors during the game and really can't be bothered to watch it all again just to give you specific examples.

You're entitled to your opinion, I'm simply pointing out that you're wrong and that you might enjoy other sports more because you clearly don't understand football...

 

[Maidenhead]

Sorry I didn't take notes of specific ref errors during the game and really can't be bothered to watch it all again just to give you specific examples.

You're entitled to your opinion, I'm simply pointing out that you're wrong and that you might enjoy other sports more because you clearly don't understand football...

And you obviously don't understand the word humility.

 

[spongebobblade]

If Lundstram can feel hard done to. It's for his first yellow. I'm not sure he really did anything there.

2nd one yes ref impeded him but he still had the option to not lunge in. It wasnt dreadful but was a booking.

Pen I'm not sure which one it was given for. 3 of ours end up on the floor. Can't tell if any were penalties given the footage. You'd think one was though. Really daft from Hulls point of view though.

It’s impossible to watch all of them at once but McBurnie literally dragged Bamford into the back of the net

 

[JT89]

And you obviously don't understand the word humility.

Oh no did someone upset you by suggesting you're not always right?

P.s since you seemed to think I should have a full time-stamped list of the refs errors, I assume you can provide a list of all his correct decisions to support your claim he had a good game?

 

[Northyorksblade]

In my experience things like that on the football field are very rarely ‘accidental’ deserved his yellow

McGuiness was livid. He def reckoned it was deliberate.

 

[Blade56]

He got in the way of players from both sides numerous times, one of which lead to their red card, Peck complained about him getting in his way at least twice amongst other times.

I did comment at the game I’d never seen a ref getting in the way of both players and ball