The Crab
Utter Gobshite
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2016
- Messages
- 32,005
- Reaction score
- 64,820
All I'm saying is they should both aspire to live Partridge-esque lives![]()
I can just picture them at the breakfast buffet with their "big plate"

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
All I'm saying is they should both aspire to live Partridge-esque lives![]()
Not sure if this has already mentioned, but surely this situation is the fault of our club representatives for approaching Chesterfield about a transfer? Why couldn't SUFC wait a week or two before entering any negotiations? That's if the transfer rumour is true of course.
No.......no.......I'm not biting.
Fingers in ears and humming loudly.
Has it gone yet?
I thought Rob Staton worked for local radio and not The New York Times.
"I get paid to break stories". Do you bollocks, Robert.
I don't know who leaked this story( club reps or rob statton). One thing is certain though statton is trying desperately to further his career hoping that Fleet Street or some other media outlets come calling!!. All he's achieved is making himself look like a complete knob who works for a shit piggy radio Sheffield!!. I'm just looking forward to the party on Sunday.
So who's Deep Throat?Rob Staton-Pilger.
Andy Woodward- Givens
Jonathan Bernstien- Buchan
Let's have some respect please, it's not all about cutting callers off reading twitter posts and sucking John Pearsons dick you know.
Seth will never have his own chat show. He wouldn't even get a gig presenting Monkey Tennis.I can just picture them at the breakfast buffet with their "big plate"![]()
Seth will never have his own chat show. He wouldn't even get a gig presenting Monkey Tennis.
YesSo once again, our great club has given some the chance to return to their preferred state of moaning misery instead of having to endure forced happiness caused by events completely beyond their comprehension!
![]()
Rob Staton-Pilger.
Andy Woodward- Givens
Jonathan Bernstien- Buchan
Let's have some respect please, it's not all about cutting callers off reading twitter posts and sucking John Pearsons dick you know.
I assume old Walter's schnozz is to suggest the newshound's instinct for a story?
The idea they are biased is accurate and founded on long experience.
Indeed, mate. Another genius named Wilder. Billy, Gene and Tufty. Three legends...
Jack and Walter were not bad, either...
Going off topic, I'm a firm believer that there are historical windows that offer a platform for success. I wonder if the likes of Jack and Walter would have had the same opportunities now as they did then? It's nothing to do with them, but it's certainly to do with the zeitgeist of whatever age we're brought up in, the expectations, hopes, what's regarded as acceptable etc. I grew to embrace the work of Jack Lemmon. It goes without saying that "Some Like It Hot" gets a special mention, arguably the funniest film ever made, but when you visit the later offerings, "Missing", and "Glengarry Glen Ross" it's clear that Lemmon was more than able, in fact an actor of considerable range and depth. It's approximately 16 years since he died, and the silver screen was a poorer place for his passing.
He's a shoe-in for doing the Inner City Sumo though.
I go further. I believe him to be the greatest movie actor of all time. Just shading the great James Stewart. His command of a range of roles (from the Wilder and Simon comedy masterpieces to the genuine pathos of Days of Wine and Roses and Glengarry) is, for me, unmatched.
A true legend. Tom Hanks is his modern day successor.
I go further. I believe him to be the greatest movie actor of all time. Just shading the great James Stewart. His command of a range of roles (from the Wilder and Simon comedy masterpieces to the genuine pathos of Days of Wine and Roses and Glengarry) is, for me, unmatched.
A true legend. Tom Hanks is his modern day successor.
Tom Hanks? Mmmmm.
I agree with most of that but Pacino became a parody of himself years ago, awful overacting. I'd say De Niro's performances have been better, on the whole, irrespective of the quality of the films they've been in during the last couple of decades.All a matter of taste and era, Sean. I think Hanks is up there with the best.
Who would have thought, given their former glories, that De Niro and, to a lesser extent, Pacino, would make some of the garbage they have? Who would have thought the young Di Caprio would go on to become, as he has in my view, one of the greats?
As for Ched...
All a matter of taste and era, Sean. I think Hanks is up there with the best.
Who would have thought, given their former glories, that De Niro and, to a lesser extent, Pacino, would make some of the garbage they have? Who would have thought the young Di Caprio would go on to become, as he has in my view, one of the greats?
As for Ched...
All a matter of taste and era, Sean. I think Hanks is up there with the best.
Who would have thought, given their former glories, that De Niro and, to a lesser extent, Pacino, would make some of the garbage they have? Who would have thought the young Di Caprio would go on to become, as he has in my view, one of the greats?
As for Ched...
My view of Hanks improved markedly with 'Philadephia', so yes, I can see the link between Hanks and actors of years gone by.
We'll have to agree to disagree about James Stewart.
But right now there's only one Wilder, and he's a Champion quality Blade! Some like it hot indeed UTMB
Well, it wouldn't do to agree on everything, mate! I'll call it a difference of emphasis, I think.
Here's one I'm pretty sure we'll be ad idem: Greatest actor who could sit on the Kop without anyone noticing? We've spoken of his work before, but not on here...
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?