Radio Pig again...

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

puppet

Active Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2009
Messages
1,747
Reaction score
1,123
Lead item in the news at 8 and 9pm - with added phone in linked to it now on Toby Foster about how theres 'a wall of silence' from BDTBL on Ched Evans and Rape Crisis Centres asking why we haven't spoken out as a club and why Evans is still on our books? Just what we need the day before such a big game.
 



Theyve already said they are not commenting while the legal process continues.

I cant see were the issue is there?
 
has the appeal taken place then ? Just listen to the playback if you can and then tell me its all fair ,hounding dave Bassett with the same question after he had answered it several times. These rape centre women justifying their cushy numbers by getting involved in an area which doesn't concern them ,as Bassett said how do they know Evans is still being paid.
It will be very interesting to see the response from Radio Pig and the The Star when Madine gets banged up.
 
has the appeal taken place then ? Just listen to the playback if you can and then tell me its all fair ,hounding dave Bassett with the same question after he had answered it several times. These rape centre women justifying their cushy numbers by getting involved in an area which doesn't concern them ,as Bassett said how do they know Evans is still being paid.
It will be very interesting to see the response from Radio Pig and the The Star when Madine gets banged up.

This was clearly an issue that was going to crop up though as such pressure groups are vocal and powerful. Its also the reason I think Evans will struggle to get a contract when he is released (Lee Hughes' victim doesnt have such a pressure group). These pressure groups are very powerful and will be able to influence sponsors etc. Whether it is fair or otherwise is irrlelevant, it was always going to happen.
 
Radio Sheffield didnt HAVE to make such an issue of it though, did they. There may be legal ramifications that have stopped us officially terminating his contract, what business is that of anyones and why should the club, in the middle of a very important time football-wise, have to justify itself?
 
Radio Sheffield didnt HAVE to make such an issue of it though, did they.

I dont know I havent heard it but I guess it is a national news story in their domain so will be all over this. You have to think that the local radio people are being asked for background and comment on this story by national journalists. Moreover their coverage of Madine will be different as his crime will be judged differently by most people. This may or may not be fair but it is reality. My own view is that the club could have prevented all this when the verdict was announced. The chose not to (they may have valid reasons) and the consequences were inevitable.
 
has the appeal taken place then ? Just listen to the playback if you can and then tell me its all fair ,hounding dave Bassett with the same question after he had answered it several times. These rape centre women justifying their cushy numbers by getting involved in an area which doesn't concern them ,as Bassett said how do they know Evans is still being paid.
It will be very interesting to see the response from Radio Pig and the The Star when Madine gets banged up.

Why has Harry been hounded?
Was this just RS or is there anything out there on't t'internet with Harry deflecting questions?
Or did they get him on to provide an opinion since the club is keeping (rightly) schtum until the appeal process has taken it's course?
 
When Evans is released, it will either be because he has been acquitted and is therefore innocent of any crime or he will have served his sentence and therefore his debt to society.

Victims' groups need to remember that latter fact. It may seem unpalatable to some on here but I wouldn't mind if Evans rejoined after his release.
 
When Evans is released, it will either be because he has been acquitted and is therefore innocent of any crime or he will have served his sentence and therefore his debt to society.

Victims' groups need to remember that latter fact. It may seem unpalatable to some on here but I wouldn't mind if Evans rejoined after his release.

Nor would I. I think he's been extremely stupid (and unlucky) but i certainly wouldn't class him in the same category as a violent rapist. Sadly, certain quarters most definitely would.
 
has the appeal taken place then ? Just listen to the playback if you can and then tell me its all fair ,hounding dave Bassett with the same question after he had answered it several times. These rape centre women justifying their cushy numbers by getting involved in an area which doesn't concern them ,as Bassett said how do they know Evans is still being paid.
It will be very interesting to see the response from Radio Pig and the The Star when Madine gets banged up.
What cushy numbers? What jobs are these then? And what is Madine up for may I ask?
 
Someone should ask the rape call centre why so many women have been involved in the twitter opinions and naming ,or is it just neanderthal football supporting thugs who suits they their man hating adgenda. Only my opinion but most charities have paid employees on ridiculous wages for the amount of work they do.
Madine is up far assault again ,hopefully twice and the judge at his last trial stated he should go to prison if he offends again.
 
When Evans is released, it will either be because he has been acquitted and is therefore innocent of any crime or he will have served his sentence and therefore his debt to society.

Victims' groups need to remember that latter fact. It may seem unpalatable to some on here but I wouldn't mind if Evans rejoined after his release.

I agree, but there is a very vindictive culture in this country towards "criminals" and especially those convicted of sexual offences. This is reflected in around 75% of the people posting on here when ever the issue comes up (I am not saying you are amongst that group). One small silver lining about the Evans case is that it may have altered some peoples' perception of "criminals" generally.
 
I agree, but there is a very vindictive culture in this country towards "criminals" and especially those convicted of sexual offences. This is reflected in around 75% of the people posting on here when ever the issue comes up (I am not saying you are amongst that group). One small silver lining about the Evans case is that it may have altered some peoples' perception of "criminals" generally.

Indeed such an opinion is so widespread that it had clearly spread to the judge who told Evans that he had ruined his career. Given reoffending rates isnt it prudent top be generally mistrustful of people who have spent time in jail? Moreover isnt the criminal justice system supposed to conatin a little bit of vindictiveness which you could argue the current tarriffs do not reflect? I can never remember its a long time since I discussed these things as an undergraduate?
 



When Evans is released, it will either be because he has been acquitted and is therefore innocent of any crime or he will have served his sentence and therefore his debt to society.

The latter point has never been accepted by some posters on here in relation to Lee Hughes, to give just one example. Some have been quite vocal in saying they would never want Hughes at our club. I am too lazy to check whether any of these people are advocating that Ched is innocent
 
Indeed such an opinion is so widespread that it had clearly spread to the judge who told Evans that he had ruined his career. Given reoffending rates isnt it prudent top be generally mistrustful of people who have spent time in jail?

Depends on what type of crime it's for. I'd hazard a guess Ched will never sleep with another girl who's had more than a couple of drinks ever again.
 
When Evans is released, it will either be because he has been acquitted and is therefore innocent of any crime or he will have served his sentence and therefore his debt to society.

The latter point has never been accepted by some posters on here in relation to Lee Hughes, to give just one example. Some have been quite vocal in saying they would never want Hughes at our club. I am too lazy to check whether any of these people are advocating that Ched is innocent

I'm not sure i'd want Marlon King at my club either.
 
I think the Judge is at fault here , for not explaining in simple language why Ched is banged up and the other lad is not for the same crime , people could have moved on a lot quicker , and has anyone actually seen the 12-0 verdict or is it hearsay ?
 
Indeed such an opinion is so widespread that it had clearly spread to the judge who told Evans that he had ruined his career. Given reoffending rates isnt it prudent top be generally mistrustful of people who have spent time in jail? Moreover isnt the criminal justice system supposed to conatin a little bit of vindictiveness which you could argue the current tarriffs do not reflect? I can never remember its a long time since I discussed these things as an undergraduate?

It all depends what you see as the point of the criminal justice system. I take the classic Enlightenment/utilitarian view that it's there to protect society and to rehabilitate offenders, that the amount of pain inflicted on the offender should be the minimum necessary to acheive those ends and that ideas of revenge and vindictiveness are barbaric. Other people obviously take a different view and take the old eye for an eye view.

I also don't think you can take a blanket approach towards anyone spending time in jail. Evans, for example, is highly unlikely to re-offend when he is released.
 
I think the Judge is at fault here , for not explaining in simple language why Ched is banged up and the other lad is not for the same crime , people could have moved on a lot quicker , and has anyone actually seen the 12-0 verdict or is it hearsay ?

The judge doesn't know. The jury made the decision not him and yes, it was unanimous.
 
Lee hughes is totally different.
He was drink driving. crashed his car at god knows what speed left two oaps dying or dead in the wreck and ran off leaving these two oaps to die.
he then hid away for 3 days.
Tell me again why its the same. or is going through a fire exit classed the same as that?

Tearstain
 
I think the Judge is at fault here , for not explaining in simple language why Ched is banged up and the other lad is not for the same crime , people could have moved on a lot quicker , and has anyone actually seen the 12-0 verdict or is it hearsay ?

I also think the judge is at fault for saying Cheds career is finished when it is clearly not.
 
Lee hughes is totally different.
He was drink driving. crashed his car at god knows what speed left two oaps dying or dead in the wreck and ran off leaving these two oaps to die.
he then hid away for 3 days.
Tell me again why its the same. or is going through a fire exit classed the same as that?

Tearstain

Not quite

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/coventry_warwickshire/3548840.stm

It was never proved he had been drinking, though one can suspect that given that he didn't give himself up for 36 hours
 
The latter point has never been accepted by some posters on here in relation to Lee Hughes, to give just one example. Some have been quite vocal in saying they would never want Hughes at our club. I am too lazy to check whether any of these people are advocating that Ched is innocent

You could argue that Lee Hughes got a very lenient sentence for what he did, whereas Ched's can be argued to be relatively harsh. I wouldn't want Lee Hughes at my club for the sole reason that I see anyone who drives under the influence as a potential murderer. Ched was just an idiot.
 
You could argue that Lee Hughes got a very lenient sentence for what he did, whereas Ched's can be argued to be relatively harsh. I wouldn't want Lee Hughes at my club for the sole reason that I see anyone who drives under the influence as a potential murderer. Ched was just an idiot.

As for Marlon King has been a serial offender with regards to the crime he did time for. Seems he has a dislike for women and is certainly a different gravy to likes of Evans.
 
if we clinch promotion saturday can someone please ring up radio pig and simple say "take that you dirty piggy bastards" should just sneak that in before you are cut off. ;)
 
if we clinch promotion saturday can someone please ring up radio pig and simple say "take that you dirty piggy bastards" should just sneak that in before you are cut off. ;)

Best off not listening to it unless we have an away match being broadcast.
 



You could argue that Lee Hughes got a very lenient sentence for what he did, whereas Ched's can be argued to be relatively harsh. I wouldn't want Lee Hughes at my club for the sole reason that I see anyone who drives under the influence as a potential murderer. Ched was just an idiot.

Again, it was never proven that he was under the influence.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom