TonyAgana
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2005
- Messages
- 6,576
- Reaction score
- 2,307
Why would you have to assume anything? I explicitly stated who I thought were idiots. Clough has clearly been backed. The fact that he hasn't spent wisely doesn't mean that he hasn't had money to spend.Well, you allude that those who say 'get you hands in your pockets' are 'idiots'. As I am one of those outspoken advocates, I assume you mean 'me'?
pommpey said:Gambles - forced by what, exactly? Would you say that Done and Brayford was a 'gamble'? We kind of know how much was spent on them. But the rest ... the 'undiscloseds', I assume are the 'gambles' you speak of? So, assuming for one dark minute that they are 'undisclosed' because they were someone else's team's unwanteds (as seems to be the case) or non-league hopefuls (as seems to be the case) one might assume that not a lot of moolah was spent on these 'gambles' at all. In fact, they are far from 'gambles', because perhaps te only gamble we face is paying their wages.
I'm being facetious because my case doesn't need any help - that paragraph ^ ^ ^ isn't my case, it's something you've made up so you can argue your's.
