blade too long
we go again
Ha ha.
I am a consultant in another field .
you specialise in crop farming then
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Ha ha.
I am a consultant in another field .
Let's hope the Prince noticed the office block and the hotel five years ago. Otherwise he's going to look a bit daft. I'm sure he's stayed in the hotel.
However you want to present it, you're talking the valuation down. As shown above. I may be wrong but I got the impression it wasn't about the valuation but about whether the Prince actually wants it.
I would have thought the means of valuation would have been set down in the original agreement. But who knows?
I think between us we have discovered the underlying cause of discord between the two of them. The Prince prefers to rent at knock down rates rather than buy the ground with McCabe reminding him he's still got an oar to stick in. Do you want to tell the judge or me?
Typical.....just when I invested in that "McCabe and the Prince", Half-and-Half scarf factory.......![]()
Got the new home shirt then ?I got a half and half shirt.
It was a number being thrown around, I don't believe for an instant it will be invested. My belief the root of this saga is that one or both of our owners has a buyer and they want all the gold for themselves.I may have missed it and I’m not prepared to read the full transcript again, but I don’t recall anyone saying £20m will guarantee promotion. Not since Jack Walker anyway.
The £20m is how much McCabe wants for BL, Shirecliffe etc.
Being thrown around by whom?It was a number being thrown around, I don't believe for an instant it will be invested. My belief the root of this saga is that one or both of our owners has a buyer and they want all the gold for themselves.
No idea but the word ‘omnifuckingshambles’ springs to mind.
A broken leg is better than having your bollocks cut off but I still don’t want a broken leg.Better than Tunafuckingthefansshambles though in my opinion.
None of that has anything to do with or even remotely explains 'why Brooks was sold'.
Got the new home shirt then ?
I used to have a half and half shirt, I had half, my mate had the other half, but he gave 80% of his half it to a twat in his local.I got a half and half shirt.
I used to have a half and half shirt, I had half, my mate had the other half, but he gave 80% of his half it to a twat in his local.
I’ve got a shirt that’s worth nothing now. I may as well just give him my half but the c***t won’t give me anything for it.![]()
Seems from the accounts and the court judgement details we had to raise money to get us through to the end of the year and keep current levels of spending, unless we chose to believe the HRH teams version of no new money nor strengthening required. Brooks may well have wanted to go but looks to me like someone had to be sold to fund the club whether the player wanted it or not.
I could, but the misses needs it to get vital supplies in. If I could just get enough to keep us going untill January.Can't you lend him your half?
If we hadn't sold Brooks then we would have a shortfall. If Kev say had vetoed the sale for his own purposes he may have benefitted legally. Either he didn't or we couldn't keep the player.
Whichever, or whatever, Wilders budget is of paramount importance as is the two owners each honouring the promise that appears to have been made to Wilder regarding cash being made available.
I think the Wilder/ cash issue was addressed in today's Star.
He gas been told to carry on with his recruitment plans.
Didn't specify - but if the names bandied about are true there must be sufficient for CW to make use of.With the Brooks money available? Or part of it ?
Gas?
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?