Mikes Gapes MP Gloats

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

silverfox

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2005
Messages
15,635
Reaction score
2,571
Location
Next door
From the star...............

A GLOATING London MP has tabled a Commons motion praising the decision of an arbitration panel which sealed Sheffield United's relegation fate.
But the move has brought an angry response from Blades fans – including Sheffield Attercliffe MP and former Sports Minister Richard Caborn.

Upton Park season ticket holder Mike Gapes has tabled his Early Day Motion in Parliament, at a cost of around £300 to the taxpayer.

In the motion, the Labour MP for Ilford South, who describes himself as a "fanatical supporter of West Ham United", says that "Sheffield United were relegated because they lost at home to Wigan in their last match and as a result only had 38 points."

It "welcomes the decision of the Premier League arbitration panel to reject the challenge by Sheffield United and Fulham to the decision to fine West Ham United rather than deduct points."

And it goes on to welcome "the fact that matters of survival and relegation were decided on the field of play and not in the law courts."

It concludes, by wishing "West Ham United a successful Premiership season and Sheffield United a successful Championship season in 2007-08."

But Mr Gapes's motion has failed to win the backing of a single fellow MP.

And Sports Minister Richard Caborn today said he's not surprised.

"I think it's uncalled for," he said. "There is still a great sense within the football family that Sheffield United were wronged. Early Day Motions such as this are not within the sporting spirit of football."

Janet Ireland, of the Sheffield United Disabled Supporters' Club, criticised the Early Day Motion as "nothing short of disgusting".

She added: "Personally I believe the decision of the arbitration panel was wong and so do many more football fans.

"For Mr Gapes to table this totally unnecessary motion is simply rubbing salt into the wounds and that is simply not on."

The arbitration panel upheld the Premier League's decision not to dock the Hammers points over the signings of Carlos Tevez and Javier Mascherano.

The three-man panel, headed by retired High Court judge Sir Philip Otton, did not have the power to change West Ham's punishment but could have ordered a new independent commission to judge the case.

The tribunal did say it had "sympathy" with the Blades, while West Ham had been "deliberately deceitful" and yet remained in the Premier League.
 

Could be worse, could've been suspended for forging documents to allow his brazillian rent-boy lover to stay in the country beyond his legal permit - oh hang on, didn't the sheffield mp who backed your case do that? Paragons of virtue eh?;)
 
Could be worse, could've been suspended for forging documents to allow his brazillian rent-boy lover to stay in the country beyond his legal permit - oh hang on, didn't the sheffield mp who backed your case do that? Paragons of virtue eh?;)

He's also a Wednesday fan, doesn't mean he's not correct on this issue however.
 
Could be worse, could've been suspended for forging documents to allow his brazillian rent-boy lover to stay in the country beyond his legal permit - oh hang on, didn't the sheffield mp who backed your case do that? Paragons of virtue eh?;)

Ah, but he's a Sheffield Wednesday fan. They are all like that!

:D :D :D
 
All Blades fans should email this idiot with their thoughts at [email protected]


someone left a comment on the stars website :D
 
Okay just a quick question so I am sure I understand what happened fully. Tabling mens to put forth the motion?

Because here it means to put it off or hold off on it till later.
 
What is an Early Day Motion?

From HERE...

Early day motions (EDMs) are formal motions submitted for debate in the House of Commons. However, very few EDMs are actually debated. Instead, they are used for reasons such as publicising the views of individual MPs, drawing attention to specific events or campaigns, and demonstrating the extent of parliamentary support for a particular cause or point of view.

An MP can add their signature to an EDM to show their support. They can also submit amendments to an existing EDM. Although majority of EDMs are never debated, the group of EDMs known as 'prayers' may be debated. Prayers are motions to overturn Statutory Instruments (laws made by Ministers under powers deriving from Acts of Parliament).

Someone has started a petition:

HERE
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom