All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
So you don't believe he owns half the whole entity? So you're agreeing with me.
Bare in mind you're arguing with someone who thinks someone can own half a club whilst having nothing to do with the ground.
So you don't believe he owns half the whole entity? So you're agreeing with me.
Although I presume you've got mixed up.
Do you think he owns half the club (not SUFC Ltd, calm down) as a whole, when the ground is nothing to do with him?
Simple yes/no then at least you're (stupidity) is on record and we can leave it at that.
) having a "contract" moment. Or a stroke.
Bare in mind you're arguing with someone who thinks someone can own half a club whilst having nothing to do with the ground.
aren't you mixing people up with Limited Companies ? Seperate Limited Companies can own different parts of the' Club'Bare in mind you're arguing with someone who thinks someone can own half a club whilst having nothing to do with the ground.
Can't you see past SUFC Ltd? It appears you're not even acknowledging the fact that the Prince doesn't have anything to do with the ground. And you really believe he owns half, in realistic terms when this is the case?Calling someone stupid using "you're stupidity" is maybe not the best way to go.
He owns half of BL which owns 100% of Sheffield United Football Club Ltd (clue in name). I think you're (
I can certainly read, it appears you can't answer direct, simple questions though.
Yes. The company that holds the licence to play in the league does not own the ground. That's the bit Poundland owns 50% of.
Let's keep it tame, just a discussion remember.
What makes up the "club" that is Sheffield United is the companies attached to it, including which assets are under which company.
*You're - sorry Sean, we all make mistakes but as you corrected mine I'll have to correct yours.
OK I'll accept you know the ground is under SU Ltd. Why can't you answer my question?
It's not a legal definition, but it's what we're talking about here which I presume is why you asked it otherwise there was no need. #277 is still unanswered btw. Are you going to answer it or not as there's no point wasting time, at least you're capable of answering that one.
It's not a legal definition, but it's what we're talking about here which I presume is why you asked it otherwise there was no need. #277 is still unanswered btw. Are you going to answer it or not as there's no point wasting time, at least you're capable of answering that one.
The reality is that it's a simple, direct question and by your own admission you can't answer it.
The reality is that it's a simple, direct question and by your own admission you can't answer it.
Hey, why pay millions for clubs when you can invest £1, not own the ground but still own half overall eh?
All these multi millionaire/billionaires paying tens of millions, when really they're missing the trick.
The daft sods.
A lie that multi millionaires are paying tens of millions for football clubs?
A lie that multi millionaires are paying tens of millions for football clubs?
Are you really, really sure about that? *Cough* Chansiri *Cough*
Well your claim that something was a "lie" is bullshit anyhow. So what was it about? If it was in response to you admitting you couldn't answer my question, it's quite clear you do just that in post #283, line 3.
SUFC Ltd, yes, which paints the false picture that he owns half of everything - when in reality that's impossible when you have no attachment to the ground. But at least now you've found out you actually can answer simple questions, despite not knowing whether you could or not in post #283 (LOL). The stupidity is out there now, at least.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
