McCabe, our plight and the apologists ...

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

No. They say categorically it happened around the same time. That's all. They do not say it was part of the Valad deal. Which it wasnt. The Valad deal involved them buying part of a Scarborough Company.
The Valad deal also involved the blades playing with their corporate identity on the shirts - in whose interest was that?
 

The Valad deal also involved the blades playing with their corporate identity on the shirts - in whose interest was that?

What's tgat got to do with CCM? You said it was part of the Valad deal. As I said even A&B don't claim that. Deal with the point.
 
you ought to drink them in quantity. You might be able to tell your arse from your elbow then.

"Created" lol. A little knowledge and all that.

Barney, get your mop and clear up his mess :)

Save yer tears...

 
Nice try. The facts? I said, The company was incorporated in July 2009. Never mentioned active or suggested it. Stop lying.
It was claimed that it was "created" ( and there's the point) "just before Princey came on board". Some other clown agreed - see below.

They are the facts.

View attachment 19487
The company came into trading just before the Prince arrived.

I thought it was clear enough what he meant.

Only a pedantic arsehole would say otherwise.
 
Save yer tears...




So it wasn't "created" just before HRH came on board then?

A pugilist like you not man enough to admit you were wrong? What would they think down the gym at Wincobank?
 
So it wasn't "created" just before HRH came on board then?

A pugilist like you not man enough to admit you were wrong? What would they think down the gym at Wincobank?

Tears for souvenirs...where's the lie?..the company was created as a vehicle for 'investment', it lay dormant...then Princey came along..Bingo!

The timescale wasn't so long...As I said, you play the pedant to avoid the bigger picture..
 
The company came into trading just before the Prince arrived.

I thought it was clear enough what he meant.

Only a pedantic arsehole would say otherwise.

"Created"

create
kriːˈeɪt/
verb
  1. 1.
    bring (something) into existence.
    "he created a thirty-acre lake"


    You have to agree because you proved yourself to be a clueless shithouse as well. Do you ever learn?

    Night Stan.
 
Tears for souvenirs...where's the lie?..the company was created as a vehicle for 'investment', it lay dormant...then Princey came along..Bingo!

The timescale wasn't so long...

It was actually for the health club which they decided to sell. Wrong again.

Which lie? The one about rent which you quoted from the accounts on Wednesday but claimed you thought it was higher Thursday? :)



Or something a bit older?

3/4 years that's all.

Night Ollie.
 
"Created"

create
kriːˈeɪt/
verb
  1. 1.
    bring (something) into existence.
    "he created a thirty-acre lake"


    You have to agree because you proved yourself to be a clueless shithouse as well. Do you ever learn?

    Night Stan.
"Created" - is it likely he wanted to know when the company came into being i.e started trading, or when it was "technically", "officially", "pedantically" formed but kept dormant for 3 years after? Despite the definition, a reasonable person would say the former, a pedantic dickhead would punt for the latter.

It'll all start to sink in when you've sobered up.
 
"Created" - is it likely he wanted to know when the company came into being i.e started trading, or when it was "technically", "officially", "pedantically" formed but kept dormant for 3 years? Despite the definition, a reasonable person would say the former, a pedantic arsehole would punt for the latter.

It'll all start to sink in when you've sobered up.


We know you make up your own definitions Stanley. But if you don't know what created means, you're thicker than I thought.

He didn't ask when it was created. He stated it was created just before the Prince came on board. Another idiot agreed with him.
 
It was actually for the health club which they decided to sell. Wrong again.

Which lie? The one about rent which you quoted from the accounts on Wednesday but claimed you thought it was higher Thursday? :)



Or something a bit older?

3/4 years that's all.

Night Ollie.

Desperate stuff Scott...must do better, we're up shit creek at the bottom of div 3 and all you can do is pin people for not having the accounts on hand to quote exact dates, terminology...unlike yourself...desperate times need desperate measures though eh?
 
Desperate stuff Scott...must do better, we're up shit creek at the bottom of div 3 and all you can do is pin people for not having the accounts on hand to quote exact dates, unlike yourself...desperate times need desperate measures though eh?
It's the only thing that maintains his self esteem in the corner of his darkened bedroom.
 
Desperate stuff Scott...must do better, we're up shit creek at the bottom of div 3 and all you can do is pin people for not having the accounts on hand to quote exact dates, terminology...unlike yourself...desperate times need desperate measures though eh?

Nothing to do with accounts, to do with you not knowing what you're talking about. No matter how much you try to swerve. Barney believes you though because he jumped on your three wheel bandwagon so has to defend his latest bout of stupidity.

its another fine mess you've got him into....
 

What's tgat got to do with CCM? You said it was part of the Valad deal. As I said even A&B don't claim that. Deal with the point.
I do deal with the point. Unlike you who persistently obfuscate. My point - as is Bell and Armstrong's unless you're actually fucking a McCabe - is that McCabe has used the blades for enhancing his own business interests rather than used his business profits to enhance the blades. If you don't read that in Bell and Armstrong's analysis - and I have given you the respect of referencing them, unlike you who just throw out platitudes - you are clearly illiterate.
 
..but don't worry fact fans, McCabe hired Akur partners, the square mile finance company back in 2010 to find him a prospective (dupe) buyer...they handed him Princey...

Pricewaterhousecooprrs advised McCabe to split the club from its assets ( hello Bladesleisure) in order to facilitate this assets stripping whilst keeping the McCabe's firmly at the wheel whilst driving us down to the depths we are now witnessing.

UTB's eh?
 
Nothing to do with accounts, to do with you not knowing what you're talking about. No matter how much you try to swerve. Barney believes you though because he jumped on your three wheel bandwagon so has to defend his latest bout if stupidity.

its another fine mess you've got him into....
No matter how you want to avoid it, the company came in to trading just before the Prince came on board.

You stated it was technically formed in 2009, which is true, but from your post it's clear you didn't want to include that it was actually kept dormant for 3 years, otherwise you'd have mentioned it. But that obviously didn't suit your agenda. Or you just didn't know altogether.
 
No matter how you want to avoid it, the company came in to trading just before the Prince came on board.

You stated it was technically formed in 2009, which is true, but from your post it's clear you didn't want to include that it was actually kept dormant for 3 years, otherwise you'd have mentioned it. But that obviously didn't suit your agenda. Or you just didn't know altogether.

He'll keep on spinning...
 
I do deal with the point. Unlike you who persistently obfuscate. My point - as is Bell and Armstrong's unless you're actually fucking a McCabe - is that McCabe has used the blades for enhancing his own business interests rather than used his business profits to enhance the blades. If you don't read that in Bell and Armstrong's analysis - and I have given you the respect of referencing them, unlike you who just throw out platitudes - you are clearly illiterate.


Says someone who can't even read what they say on the one page out of over 400 where this comes up. McCabe was in China BEFORE our PL season. Do you accept that? Have you even checked? If you do and find its true - which it is - will you ask them about it?

Bit rich calling someone illiterate when you were unable to identify the poster you discussed it with in the first place.

CCM. Have you re read p378 yet? Do they say its part of the Valad deal as you claimed or do they say it happened around the same time, which my copy States?

Re the Valad sponsorship, the football club benefitted ? Are you saying otherwise?
 
No matter how you want to avoid it, the company came in to trading just before the Prince came on board.

You stated it was technically formed in 2009, which is true, but from your post it's clear you didn't want to include that it was actually kept dormant for 3 years, otherwise you'd have mentioned it. But that obviously didn't suit your agenda. Or you just didn't know altogether.

I never said technically. Stop lying! It WAS formed in 2009, Companies House confirmed it. You two clowns said it was "created" "just" before HRH came on board. In fact you said it began trading just before that, which again is bollocks.

Look at the thread from a couple of days ago where I stated it was dormant and was to be used for the health club. I even commentated on the shareholding. Your mate was party to that conversation but seemingly forgot, a bit like his rent faux pas. The search facility isxa wonderful thing, IF, you aren't trying to hide something.
 
Says someone who can't even read what they say on the one page out of over 400 where this comes up. McCabe was in China BEFORE our PL season. Do you accept that? Have you even checked? If you do and find its true - which it is - will you ask them about it?

Bit rich calling someone illiterate when you were unable to identify the poster you discussed it with in the first place.

CCM. Have you re read p378 yet? Do they say its part of the Valad deal as you claimed or do they say it happened around the same time, which my copy States?

Re the Valad sponsorship, the football club benefitted ? Are you saying otherwise?
You know what I am saying. Why do you continually obfuscate? Are you okay?
 
I never said technically. Stop lying! It WAS formed in 2009, Companies House confirmed it. You two clowns said it was "created" "just" before HRH came on board. In fact you said it began trading just before that, which again is bollocks.
The simple fact remains that the company started trading well after it was initially formed. You pointed out when it was technically formed.

It was clear enough to anyone that isn't pissed (as you clearly are), or to anyone that doesn't have fairies whizzing around in their head that the information wasn't needed when the company didn't do anything for 3 years after ffs. Even though you conveniently didn't actually mention that in order to pretend that it started trading in 2009.

Lol. You really should stay off the sherries on here, especially when you argue utterly idiotic and stupid things like "which owner owns the ground doesn't matter" when your sober.
 
Last edited:
You know what I am saying. Why do you continually obfuscate? Are you okay?

The more you read, just like that WHF fella, the more you realise that they walk amongst us. Either McCabe's, McCabe plants, or simply friends of friends who are guided by the club. Puppets posting as fans, pure and simple.
 
The simple fact remains that the company started trading well after it was initially formed. You pointed out when it was technically formed.

It was clear enough to anyone that isn't pissed (as you clearly are), or to anyone that doesn't have fairies whizzing around in their head that the information wasn't needed when the company didn't do anything for 3 years after ffs. Even though you conveniently didn't actually mention that in order to pretend that it started trading in 2009.

Lol. You really should stay off the sherries on here, especially when you argue utterly idiotic and stupid things like "which owner owns the ground doesn't matter" when your sober.


Last word as far as you're concerned.

Why do you keep using the word technically? I didn't use it. It wasn't I technically formed it WAS formed. Therefore it wasn't created just before HRH joined. That's a fact. What you object to is having it pointed out that you're clueless. You'll have to get used to it one day.

I never mentioned when it began trading. Again you did and guess what, you said it started trading before he came along. Again utter rubbish.

Nothing I've said is untrue. Every claim you made is because you're a halfwit. That's what the issue is here. You're mate was quoting from the BL accounts three days ago. It's not as if he hadn't had a good look at it to see what was going on but he did say it was formed for the hotel, again wrong and is now claiming it was formed for the asset split when the assets all went elsewhere. He's a wum , you're just a thick twat. Technically.
 
You know what I am saying. Why do you continually obfuscate? Are you okay?

It's not me not answering questions. If you aren't going to comment on the point, asking of I'm okay, like some 14 year old on snapchat isn't going to hide your ignorance.

Do you understand McCabe was in China before our PL season?

Why don't you quote verbatim what the authors said about the Valad deal rather than just giving your "understanding" of it? In fact you could have done that when you quoted the book.

Two simple questions.

The third one you'll have to ask. Did Bell and Armstrong know he was trading in China? if not, how come they didn't do the research and if they did, why didn't they say so? Seeing as one of them is your mate, surely you can get an answer.

It's telling that one page in Fit and Proper is your only apparent connection with the club. You hardly ever comment on the club. Players or the game.
 
Last word as far as you're concerned.

Why do you keep using the word technically? I didn't use it. It wasn't I technically formed it WAS formed. Therefore it wasn't created just before HRH joined. That's a fact. What you object to is having it pointed out that you're clueless. You'll have to get used to it one day.

I never mentioned when it began trading. Again you did and guess what, you said it started trading before he came along. Again utter rubbish.

Nothing I've said is untrue. Every claim you made is because you're a halfwit. That's what the issue is here. You're mate was quoting from the BL accounts three days ago. It's not as if he hadn't had a good look at it to see what was going on but he did say it was formed for the hotel, again wrong and is now claiming it was formed for the asset split when the assets all went elsewhere. He's a wum , you're just a thick twat. Technically.
We all know who the thick twat is. It's the one who thinks it doesn't matter which owner owns the ground.

You'd have to be some monumental thick twat to come up with utter bollocks like that.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom