1889
Well-Known Member
Would you not have Ndiaye and Berge back then? McB is way better than Moore.
Unfortunately, I think that’s like arguing who is the tallest dwarf ?

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Would you not have Ndiaye and Berge back then? McB is way better than Moore.
That would leave Souza with a ridiculous amount of defensive work to do.
I prefer Kevin Keegan styled games anyway.That would leave Souza with a ridiculous amount of defensive work to do.
Hamer was more than defensively solid and at his most productive when playing deeper for coventry either in a double pivot or on right hand side of midfield diamond. And on occassion played either the deeper role or the most advanced role in a 3511. COH and BBD also more than capable of making up that defensive workrate difference if present also.That would leave Souza with a ridiculous amount of defensive work to do.
Why is it always a vendetta? I don't rate Mcburnie personally but if he could stay fit he'd be a good option short term.Everyone without a personal vendetta against Ol agrees with this pal, don't worry.
On a loan until the end of the season, it just makes sense from our perspective.
If we got promoted, that's when we look at other options.
He's shown he has a great understanding with BBD and is a big upgrade on our current number 9.
I think he'd be a success in this new setup.
Obviously given Dronnie's concrete ties with the Las Palmas backroom staff, it sounds like they'd be willing to get Ol on a flight as soon as possible.
One of our main players in coming 9th, joint top goal scorer for us when we last got promoted. In a good side in the championship he's about as good as we could getWhy is it always a vendetta? I don't rate Mcburnie personally but if he could stay fit he'd be a good option short term.
I was mainly referring to one poster's personal anti-McBurnie crusade that's been ongoing for several years now.Why is it always a vendetta? I don't rate Mcburnie personally but if he could stay fit he'd be a good option short term.
Hamer had a pass completion rate for Coventry of 68% in 22/23 playing in that role. Given that we struggle with transitions at the moment and Peck (81.8%), Davies (86.4%), Arblaster (85.1%) and (ridiculously) Souza (89%) get castigated for giving the ball away we'd be in all kinds of trouble if Hamer was chucking away possesion 1 in 3 times at the base of the midfield.Hamer was more than defensively solid and at his most productive when playing deeper for coventry either in a double pivot or on right hand side of midfield diamond. And on occassion played either the deeper role or the most advanced role in a 3511. COH and BBD also more than capable of making up that defensive workrate difference if present also.![]()
Do me a favour Balham , please go away with good stats and facts and let some of us play the Kevin Keegan style football. Much appreciated, Wiz!Hamer had a pass completion rate for Coventry of 68% in 22/23 playing in that role. Given that we struggle with transitions at the moment and Peck (81.8%), Davies (86.4%), Arblaster (85.1%) and (ridiculously) Souza (89%) get castigated for giving the ball away we'd be in all kinds of trouble if Hamer was chucking away possesion 1 in 3 times at the base of the midfield.
Bang on mate.I'd have the other 2 back in a heartbeat. They're luxury players, particularly Ndiaye.
There are plenty of strikers out there who can score the same amount of goals McBurnie can. All of similar cost too.
I always liked McBurnie and defended him on here, but I'd rather is invest in pace up front
Great stats, also love replies getting in to the nitty gritty even if im wrong far too many people dont have the patience to post stuff like this.Hamer had a pass completion rate for Coventry of 68% in 22/23 playing in that role. Given that we struggle with transitions at the moment and Peck (81.8%), Davies (86.4%), Arblaster (85.1%) and (ridiculously) Souza (89%) get castigated for giving the ball away we'd be in all kinds of trouble if Hamer was chucking away possesion 1 in 3 times at the base of the midfield.
In that case let's sign Fleck, Norwood, Enda et al. Like i said a decent squad addition to the seasons end if he can stay fit.One of our main players in coming 9th, joint top goal scorer for us when we last got promoted. In a good side in the championship he's about as good as we could get
That forward line is taking no shit from no one.
If Hamer could stop giving the ball away, then he'd be a Premier League player.Hamer had a pass completion rate for Coventry of 68% in 22/23 playing in that role. Given that we struggle with transitions at the moment and Peck (81.8%), Davies (86.4%), Arblaster (85.1%) and (ridiculously) Souza (89%) get castigated for giving the ball away we'd be in all kinds of trouble if Hamer was chucking away possesion 1 in 3 times at the base of the midfield.
If Hamer could stop giving the ball away, then he'd be a Premier League player.
Half his yellows are because he has to chase back and foul an opposition player he's just passed too.
He can't play centre midfield for us. I get why people might think that way, but no
De Bruynes stats aren't great in this regard for the very same reason, attempting defence splitting passes.If Hamer could stop giving the ball away, then he'd be a Premier League player.
Half his yellows are because he has to chase back and foul an opposition player he's just passed too.
He can't play centre midfield for us. I get why people might think that way, but no
Exactly. Hamer loses the ball at times as he tries to make things happen, I’m sure he could knock it sideways and backwards and up his completion percentage but that’s not why he’s in the team.De Bruynes stats aren't great in this regard for the very same reason, attempting defence splitting passes.
Very difficult to do with a high goal scoring rate when completed. Risk vs reward.
Do you think Anel lacks physicality? I don’t see him getting bullied by attackers tbf. I think he lacks concentration and switches off at times which is his main weakness.Mcburnie played his best football for us a in a partnership with Ndiaye, his partnership with BBD a close second.
Who knows, maybe BBD playing alongside him (or on the LW) might make Moore improve as BBD could perhaps do the things Moore isn't so good at, and vice versa.
Similar to Anel/Souttar this season as they both covered up each others weaknesses, Souttars lack of pace vs Anel's lack of physicality.
Hamer loses the ball every other forward pass and about one in four simple sideways passes. He is a superb footballer at this level but there is a very good reason we play him in an advanced role.Exactly. Hamer loses the ball at times as he tries to make things happen, I’m sure he could knock it sideways and backwards and up his completion percentage but that’s not why he’s in the team.
In no way am I advocating playing at the base of midfield- not his forte at all.Hamer loses the ball every other forward pass and about one in four simple sideways passes. He is a superb footballer at this level but there is a very good reason we play him in an advanced role.
Like o hare, hamer, Moore, McCallum, cooper, gilchrist, Campbell, rak sakyiIt's a revolutionary idea and will never catch on, but perhaps we could simply sign someone who hasn't played for us before
He doesn't lack physicality, but Souttar was a lot stronger, especially in the air.Do you think Anel lacks physicality? I don’t see him getting bullied by attackers tbf. I think he lacks concentration and switches off at times which is his main weakness.
Again, as with BBD I’m not sure that’s proven out.Everywhere else he’s been he’s been pretty much an automatic first pick when fit. Now he isn’t, which probably doesn’t sit well with him. But La Liga is possibly a step above his abilities as a player, as was the PL.
Which of the players who we signed in the summer had played for us before? I’m struggling to think of one?It's a revolutionary idea and will never catch on, but perhaps we could simply sign someone who hasn't played for us before
It was more a point about the denizens of the Rumour Mill having even more limited fields of vision than our scouting department.Which of the players who we signed in the summer had played for us before? I’m struggling to think of one?
Edit: just seen Frank make the same point. It’s true though.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?