Sothall_Blade
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2009
- Messages
- 6,703
- Reaction score
- 8,515
The implication seems to be that now we need to replace Howard for three months, we can't afford to renew Gallagher's loan deal without a transfer embargo being imposed due to the FFP limits on wages.
How is that possible when Gallagher is essentially a replacement for Williamson who we offered a full contract to? When Williamson didn't sign that should have freed up enough room in the budget for another permanent signing. Now we apparently can't even fund a short-term replacement.
Also, I would question the wisdom of having SIX strikers in the squad. Five of whom were signed this Summer. Surely the club need to be trying to send either Miller or Porter out on loan to free up some cash for the positions where we're looking very threadbare?
How is that possible when Gallagher is essentially a replacement for Williamson who we offered a full contract to? When Williamson didn't sign that should have freed up enough room in the budget for another permanent signing. Now we apparently can't even fund a short-term replacement.
Also, I would question the wisdom of having SIX strikers in the squad. Five of whom were signed this Summer. Surely the club need to be trying to send either Miller or Porter out on loan to free up some cash for the positions where we're looking very threadbare?