blade too long
we go again
I can only best guess and say that it's maybe because of how a deal is structured? I would think the term "undisclosed fee" has replaced "a deal worth". Say for example we sell a player and the deal is £500'000 down, £500'000 after 100 games, then the "deal worth" is £1m. The trouble with that is, when you buy a replacement, the club you are dealing with knows you have £1m because they have seen it in the media, and will inflate the price accordingly. If it's "undisclosed fee" then it may be more difficult for them to know exactly how much you have.
Like I said though, I'm taking a punt of a guess here.
clubs could really abuse such split payments , insisting say only 500k has been paid and hoping the other 500k plus they can cover from going up
so speculators get financial aid in a sense,
you could juggle figures around at will to stay within limits we only paid 80k for him and 920000 k if we go up
its is either fully transparency you go for or just another system with loop holes in it