originaltrueblade
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2014
- Messages
- 5,504
- Reaction score
- 8,475
Yes or No
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Make an argument for him without using his CV? Ermmmmmm, he's a blade.I'd like to hear an argument for without someone referring to that he did in the previous promotion season and first season in the Premier League. All I ever read are arguments for based on things he did 5-6 years ago.
I'd like to read some arguments for based on the present, not the past. What has he done in the last year or two to convince you that he is the man to stabilise and rebuild this team?
Nothing.... but it doesn't matter because he "gets the club" and most of all is a blade! Were always living in the past sadly..I'd like to hear an argument for without someone referring to that he did in the previous promotion season and first season in the Premier League. All I ever read are arguments for based on things he did 5-6 years ago.
I'd like to read some arguments for based on the present, not the past. What has he done in the last year or two to convince you that he is the man to stabilise and rebuild this team?
Micky Adams was a Blade?Nothing.... but it doesn't matter because he "gets the club" and most of all is a blade! Were always living in the past sadly..
Multiple votes? Two choicesYes or No
Make an argument for him without using his CV? Ermmmmmm, he's a blade.
Clubs often pay managers out of other clubs and give them big contracts because they're currently having success. Often, they get sacked within a year despite their recent success and it turns out that they're no better than the other 30 managers doing the rounds at your level.
If every manager was replaced with a cat, at the end of the season we'd call some of them geniuses and others would get sacked.
Any critique of the point?“If every manager was replaced with a cat,”
Got to this and wished l’d stopped reading earlier.
Well l’d look at the most recent guff on the CV. Phil Browns looked okay at one point.Any critique of the point?
Wilder appears to have failed since PL2. Didn’t expect miracles this season but he achieved very little.Plenty of managers have guff on their CVs and end up doing a decent job. Plenty of managers have what looks like the perfect CV and do terrible job (Adkins). Ancelotti went to Everton and failed, I'm sure Real Madrid are happy they didn't dismiss him based on that.
Just feels like a stop gap until he’s replaced everything is meh.I'd like to hear an argument for without someone referring to that he did in the previous promotion season and first season in the Premier League. All I ever read are arguments for based on things he did 5-6 years ago.
I'd like to read some arguments for based on the present, not the past. What has he done in the last year or two to convince you that he is the man to stabilise and rebuild this team?
Why not? He's an example of a manager who walked into a badly run club with unrealistic expectations and failed.Wilder appears to have failed since PL2. Didn’t expect miracles this season but he achieved very little.
Using Ancelotti as an example, really?![]()
“If every manager was replaced with a cat,”
Got to this and wished l’d stopped reading earlier.
We’ve got no players. Get rid of the manager & we’ve kind of got nothing other than a football pitch
Forgot even that’s been pulled upEr, about that...
You seem to have to use other managers to prove a point. Wilder has struggled since PL1. That’s a fact, no matter what Tom Dick or Harry has done before or since.Why not? He's an example of a manager who walked into a badly run club with unrealistic expectations and failed.
Every manager eventually "fails". Did he underachieve at Boro? Carrick seems a decent manager and had the exact same slow start to the season that got Wilder the sack.
Hecky was a good manager for us and succeeded, but failed this season and got sacked. Wilder rallied a squad with a loser mentality for a couple of games, until they reverted to type when results didn't come. With a massive gulf in quality and a group of players who had given up, what did you expect?
I'm not confident Wilder will succeed next season, but acting like it's a fact that he's washed up I find strange.
I'm using other managers as examples to prove the point, don't see anything wrong with that. It's not as though I can use the future to evidence our decision to keep him.You seem to have to use other managers to prove a point. Wilder has struggled since PL1. That’s a fact, no matter what Tom Dick or Harry has done before or since.
Poisoned chalice this year, don’t blame him for relegation but if his stock was as high as you seem to think, he wouldn’t have needed to dive into the shit show.
He once said something about lefties.I don’t think there’s many Unitedites who travel home and away who want wilder out next season. That’s not me having a go at people who don’t go at all, just my observation at games. It’s only ever on this forum that I see such a surge for wanting him out. The pigs also seem to ask about wilder’s return with big grins on their face, I think they’d be much more relaxed if he wasn’t our manager.
You tell me. There’s nothing recent to show he’s still got it. Which is my point.I'm using other managers as examples to prove the point, don't see anything wrong with that.
His stock isn't high and wasn't when he rejoined. The question is, is sacking a manager with a low stock always the right decision and does hiring a manager with lots of hype and recent success always pay off?
And my point is, sacking every manager that has bad results without considering the context is reactive, expensive and dumb.You tell me. There’s nothing recent to show he’s still got it. Which is my point.
I'd like to hear an argument for without someone referring to that he did in the previous promotion season and first season in the Premier League. All I ever read are arguments for based on things he did 5-6 years ago.
I'd like to read some arguments for based on the present, not the past. What has he done in the last year or two to convince you that he is the man to stabilise and rebuild this team?
A manager who fucked off.And my point is, sacking every manager that has bad results without considering the context is reactive, expensive and dumb.
Madrid could have decided that there was nothing Ancelotti had done in the past few years that proved he still had it. That line of thought is clearly flawed. Bayern have hired Company after the shit he's delivered this season. It's not only little old Sheffield United, insular and small time that would hire a manager despite their recent history.
Surely every manager is desperate to succeed, not just Blades supporting bosses.Regards the here and now.
1: He knows the club, the culture, the fan expectation inside out.
2: He's been on the inside during the most difficult times, so you would expect him to know the problems, the problem players and what's needed.
3: This job is his last chance saloon, a bit like Wayne Rooney's managerial career, if this fails then where does he go from there?
So surely he'll be incredibly determined to succeed more than previous managers.
4: He has a good/close relationship with the owner, experiencing both the great and poor times.
5: He's a great track record at rebuilding. At Middlesboro and Watford, there was no rebuilding needed.
The main negative for me regards keeping Wilder is that they talk about positive momentum, but there's also negative momentum.
Last season was so disastrously bad, that if we lose our early games (especially if we play well but are unlucky conceding last minute goals) then the players, the fans and the manager will have flashbacks, like some form of PTSD and on here everyone will be convinced we're heading for league 1.
Sometimes when there's a dark cloud of defeat and negativity over a club.
It might not be Wilders fault but often owners prefer a massive clear out, loads of new players and also a fresh start with a new manager.
Another factor to get rid is the practical side of finances. He's in his final year, so wouldn't cost that much to sack and pay compensation.
Personally I like to give every manager we've had a chance and only sack them when their position is untenable. Also it depends what alternative options we have, unless there's a chance of bringing in an impressive manager, then may as well give CW a chance to repair his damaged reputation.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?