Eric_Brooks
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2020
- Messages
- 1,221
- Reaction score
- 1,591
Tanganga at millwall. Not huge but got a good leap and aggressive. Also not as wreckless as he used to be. I think he wants to leave millwall
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Guess it all depends on whether the new board are funding any permanent signings. Not the tallest CB though, think he's 6ft tall, the same as Gilchrist.Tanganga at millwall. Not huge but got a good leap and aggressive. Also not as wreckless as he used to be. I think he wants to leave millwall
I'd bring in a RWB that can attack and cross, we miss George/Bogle in this team, and that allows Gilchrist to move into the middle, between Anel and Robbo, hes predominantly a CB anyway.
Choudry into midfield, BBD down the left, Brooks right, complimented with a new RWB to push forward..... thoughts?
As I said, we would need to use Gilchrist in his preferred position at CB, and if Seriki does come back, we still need a defender, eather way, we still need cover in both Areas.I think a lot depends on how close Seriki is to a return. He has all the attributes we need in that position and I suspect that incomings will be limited to 3 or 4.
So I can't see Chris using a spot on a RB unless absolutely necessary, considering we already desperately need a CB, CM, LW and ST.
been impressed with mcallum when hes come on a system with him lb and burrows lm and ben brereton lw would give us a very good left sideNot sure if this has been mentioned couldn't we play RND as left centre back it's clear Burrows and Mccallum are ahead of him at LB he would be fine in the Championship
so you are going back to a 3 5 2 or summat ? which we have only played as a plan B and been shyte with itI'd bring in a RWB that can attack and cross, we miss George/Bogle in this team, and that allows Gilchrist to move into the middle, between Anel and Robbo, hes predominantly a CB anyway.
Choudry into midfield, BBD down the left, Brooks right, complimented with a new RWB to push forward..... thoughts?
yes very important that we bring bbd in or somebody to play that position were so weak in midfield just now with arblaster and souza out we have to get hamer back in to the more central attacking midfielder role personally think we will bring a right back in and move gilchrist to his natural position centre back or certainly competing for that role hes done well but the lad isnt a.right backWe now need a centre half, central midfield cover, a left winger ideally BBD so we can move Gus to his best position and a striker.
Before he got that bad injury (tracking back desperately to cover up a stupid Norwood corner routine), LCB was starting to look like his best position.Not sure if this has been mentioned couldn't we play RND as left centre back it's clear Burrows and Mccallum are ahead of him at LB he would be fine in the Championship
Not necessarily, we don't have cover at CB other than Gilchrist or the youth, we don't have any cover at RWB if Seriki is out long term, don't you think it's better to cover the positions were shortest in??so you are going back to a 3 5 2 or summat ? which we have only played as a plan B and been shyte with it
No they don't, as 3 will be loans.... any perms would need to be better, but if its correct that BBD and Choudry are loans with options, then we're exactly where we need to be.I read all these comments about players needed. Yes we do need some new players in. However how many would be of a Premiership standard?
These players need to be of that standard. Look what happened last time.
Also the three that went up last season, presently occupy the three bottom spots in the Premiership.
Just saying
but we don't have to name our youngsters in our 25 man squadForget Brooks, Billing, both played yesterday for the The Cherries. The loan limit is 5 max in matchday squad of 18. So we could bring in another 3.
where have we been linked with choudrayNo they don't, as 3 will be loans.... any perms would need to be better, but if its correct that BBD and Choudry are loans with options, then we're exactly where we need to be.
Obviously 3rd loan is Souts replacement.
I read all these comments about players needed. Yes we do need some new players in. However how many would be of a Premiership standard?
These players need to be of that standard. Look what happened last time.
Also the three that went up last season, presently occupy the three bottom spots in the Premiership.
Just saying
Think it depends what Blades content you use, CHOUDRY and BBD are the 2 players the previous owner sanctioned Wilder to move for, they were identified previously, obviously now we need to replace Souttar aswell.where have we been linked with choudray![]()
He came here because we couldn’t buy anyone better and needed an Osborne replacement ie someone that can play a few positions in situations of dire emergency. Can see him moved on in the summer or possibly in January if we can bring in 4 players for specific positions rather than 1 that’s passable at 3 positionsWhat about poor old Shackleton , he must be wondering why he came here
Not ones that are registered to us. So One for example, will not be registered. However, we do have to register young players whom we sign on loan. Not sure if that applies to Gilchrist or JRS based on their ages though.but we don't have to name our youngsters in our 25 man squad
Hes also injured, again.He came here because we couldn’t buy anyone better and needed an Osborne replacement ie someone that can play a few positions in situations of dire emergency. Can see him moved on in the summer or possibly in January if we can bring in 4 players for specific positions rather than 1 that’s passable at 3 positions
Injured again isn't he...What about poor old Shackleton , he must be wondering why he came here
God help us ...Injured again isn't he...
Not prem quality eather.God help us ...
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?