Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Unlucky but not an error as such. I hope the lad is ok.
From the limited amount of games that I saw him - yes.Did you think Mel Rees was a good keeper ?
I sense an agenda here. Where would he have come out to had he been "marooned on his line"? Just tell us where he should have been Cerberus. Watch it again and use the 6 yard box as a measure. When the Reading player turns it in, Jamal is in the proper position to cover the shot. That is at about 2 yards advanced from his line at an angle to the assumed approach. FFS, if he had been "marooned on his line", he actually would have had a better chance at saving it because he could have chucked himself to the left parallel to his line. As it was, the ball was then played at a slight diagonal at speed across him to where our remaining defender got his feet in a tangle.
He was not "marooned on his line". If you want to try and pick spots off him at least get it right. I think one of your previous posts also criticised him for not being on his line. Now let's from a goalkeeper's perspective analyse what he could have done as a counsel of perfection. He could have been a yard further forward when the ball was played to the Reading player who passed it across. That would have invited the shot rather than the cross, as advancing hurries the player and doesn't give him time to make a good pass. Jamal is also in a position then to attempt the interception. But as with all things, it is a question of balance. What you win with being slightly more advanced you lose on time to react or covering the lob/chip etc etc etc. It's not a precise science it'a a question of feel, experience, risk and reward, kidology, odds and angles and bravery.
He's not perfect. He does take time to get down when it is close to him because he's got further to go shifting enough body to drop. But equally he is physically imposing and he'll not be beaten in the air and his reach is better than most when he is down.IMHO Moore is a better "reaction keeper" and takes less risk on distribution. Swings and Roundabouts.
Luckily a Wilder team is picked on ability and form. At the moment Jamal may not be the finished article but he and it isn't "broke" so he and it doesn't need fixing IMHO and manufacturing faults that don't exist doesn't help.
I can't understand why such a young keeper gets so much stick from the fans. He has been brilliant since he come in I haven't seen the goal so can't comment on that but even if it was his mistake he is a young lad and is still learning never mind the fact that any keeper can have mistakes. I think we finally have 2 very good keepers fighting for a place and the one that has got us where we are in the league is getting stick for what I am unsure. He is a very good keeper in my opinion and hasn't been at fault for any of the goals but o well some people have to have some thing to moan at don't they.
So how come you can judge Rees after 9 games but need another 13 games to judge Blackman on top of the 14 hes already played ? ?From the limited amount of games that I saw him - yes.
So how come you can judge Rees after 9 games but need another 13 games to judge Blackman on top of the 14 hes already played ? ?
He's certainly better than Simmo and Howard.
You see I interpret 'not having a lot do' as marshalling the defence and keeping goals out which he has done admirably. He doesn't make saves for the camera but he does a goalkeepers job brilliantly. As for last night ,a lot of very unfair flack heading his way ,he collided with a player and dropped the ball encountering an injury ,unluckily the ball fell at their strikers foot.I just knew you were going to come back with that. And here's my answer...
What I recall of Mel Rees, and it's going back a long time now, is that he came into a side that wasn't great defensively. He made an immediate impact with some heroic goalkeeping. I remember one game in particular, stood on the kop behind the goal, and Rees is forced to pull off several amazing saves due to some suicidal defending. I remember Rees looking at the kop and shaking his head in disbelief at the situation he'd just been put into. I don't think there's anyone who saw him play during that unfortunately short spell, who would say any different about him being a very impressive keeper. It is a long time ago, but I don't recall anything about his game that gave any concerns.
I think the situation with Blackman is a different kettle of fish altogether. For a start, he's a young lad learning his trade. Rees was a more established, experienced, keeper. I think Blackman is also playing behind a very good defence and in a lot of the games this season, quite honestly, he's had very little to do. What he has done, he's done mostly well. However, as I've said, there are a few things about his game that I think he needs to improve on. I'm trying to be fair to the lad when I say, in not so many words, the jury is out for me. Let's give it a bit more time and see how he develops.
Funny, but I spend a lot of time coaching junior football and go all around Sheffield, Rotherham, occasionally foraging into Derbyshire, with the team. I'd say the majority view of fellow Blades that I meet is similar to mine - "not quite sure" yet re Blackman. It's no crime - it's just being honest about what we see.
Ditto mate
witch hunt you’ve been at it for ages.. drop itI'm not "manufacturing" any faults mate - that's nonsense. I'm giving my opinion on what I see. And if you disagree then that's absolutely fine, you're entitled to your opinion as I am mine. For me, the lad has looked hesitant and indecisive on several occasions and I am unconvinced by his goalkeeping. Is that o.k.? Or do I have to conform to a different point of view because it's not yours?
‘i’m not aware he has so much stick’ .. hmm what’s this thread then?I'm not aware that Blackman has had "so much stick" from the fans? Where has that come from? There has been very little in the form of criticism of the guy. I am one of a few voices on here that have said I'm not convinced about him, because I think he is hesitant and indecisive and his distribution is dodgy (not just his kicking - but his passing it out to defenders and putting them under pressure). I've also credited him with some brilliant saves and in particular taking the ball in the air - he was immense in the away game at Bolton for example - and he had a lot of aerial bombardment there, especially towards the end of the game when they threw their big strikers on. You'll have to let me know what the rules are, because to me, I think it's absolutely fine to say it as I see it. To say what I think a player does well, and not so well. I don't think that equals "giving a player stick". Saying a player is "crap" is giving a player stick - and I haven't said that about Blackman or any of the players.
I think the problem is, for some folks, any slight criticism of any United player is red rag to a bull for them. And some fans are very quick, very, very, quick actually, to try and make some player their next hero or cult figure. Absolutely desperate for it. Look at the guy EEL last season. He's another one that I said I wasn't convinced about early on, when others were foaming at the mouth about him. For the record, I also said that I thought Coutts should be in the team during that losing spell at the start of last season - and the reason I gave was that he was a composed passer of the ball and I felt that was needed at the time.
I'm not right about all the players, all the time. No one is. But I don't see anything wrong in sharing my honest opinion on something -if others don't agree that's absolutely fine. They are as entitled to their opinions as I am mine.
I totally agree ,these things happen in football,that's what makes it an exciting game.All these experts slagging the lad off,most of whom have probably never played the gameBefore deciding this was a howler, we need to establish what Jamal could have done differently. He had to come for this ball, and he makes a clean catch. Punching the ball would have been risky. Is the collision an accident or avoidable? The only criticism that could be made is whether there was communication between him and CCV, and I don't think any of us can know that. It is difficult to see it as other than unlucky. And the lad also has an injury to deal with - we should wish hIm well.
Just seen it. Completely not at fault for that. He's landed after hitting someone.
that word 'never' is definitely bollocks after last night.
I am really surprised people dont see this as an major error. He has jumped caught it and then somehow fell and dropped the ball leading to an open goal. Other than throwing it in his own net (which he pretty much did!l not sure how much more of a mistake you could make! It is not unlucky. He has dropped the ball. It is basic stuff really and regardless of contact from Carter Vickers he has to make sure he regains control of the ball. Not sure why he needed to take it so high (normally you telk keepers to take at highest point) as it made it so hard for him to come down without falling over. I think he has been great by the way but its a mistake.
witch hunt you’ve been at it for ages.. drop it
I'm going to risk a backlash here but anyone else think he might not be that injured?
I am really surprised people dont see this as an major error. He has jumped caught it and then somehow fell and dropped the ball leading to an open goal. Other than throwing it in his own net (which he pretty much did!l not sure how much more of a mistake you could make! It is not unlucky. He has dropped the ball. It is basic stuff really and regardless of contact from Carter Vickers he has to make sure he regains control of the ball. Not sure why he needed to take it so high (normally you telk keepers to take at highest point) as it made it so hard for him to come down without falling over. I think he has been great by the way but its a mistake.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?