Ismaila Coulibaly

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

The kid is what, 21 and everyone seems to be of the opinion he's a waste of time. He's been told.... we've been told, he's firmly in Heckys plans for this season.

I'd rather him play over fleck going forward put it that way, but for mobility reasons.
Fleck and his mobility scooter? Gets him up to 15mph I'll have you know 😉
 

I thought he played okay in the cup match with Spurs.
Easy to treat him differently to the Academy lads and forget how old he is (or isn't).

Harrison Neal is 22. Boyes, Amissah and Brunt all hit 22 before Coulibaly hits 23.

No posts suggesting we bin these guys off, none of which are as close to the first team as Coulibaly.

Let's wait and see how he emerges this season before we take him out back and turn him to glue, eh?

If Lundstram could break through then why not this guy?
 
We need to sell him. I don't really understand why we'd loan him out because he's not going to qualify for a new work permit if we offer him a new contract. Unless we can loan him out to a club in Europe where he'll play regularly.

In terms of a work permit

What counts as an appearance? Does he need to get on the pitch or if he’s in the squad does that count even if he doesn’t play?

With 9 subs I can see him being on the mech at the least for a build of our games.
 
In terms of a work permit

What counts as an appearance? Does he need to get on the pitch or if he’s in the squad does that count even if he doesn’t play?

With 9 subs I can see him being on the mech at the least for a build of our games.
minutes played of total minutes could have played, I believe.

He wasn't good enough to play in the Championship. I find him getting minutes quite unlikely!

And I assume we couldn't offer him a new contract until the end of this season as he fails based on last one.
 
Shown nothing so far , dont get all this hype about him , Boyes Brunt Brooks Arblaster shown loads,let him go .
How can you say he's shown nothing? He's not even played. There was obviously a player there in that first season at Beerschott and I agree with others he did OK against Spurs.

I trust Hecky's judgement but to not even give him a run in cup games then keep him seems pointless and totally unfair on the lad.
 
I do think he could be a decent player but what makes you think he's going to be playing in the PL when he struggled to make benches in the Championship behind Fleck and Osborn?

He deserved more chances last season IMO.
 
Have they accepted?

Doesn't make a difference if they have? The fact we've offered them a contract would likely mean Coulibaly is behind them in the pecking order regardless of whether they accept or not.

If they reject, we'll likely replace them.
 
You never know, maybe he's about to do a Lundstram - as in be next season's surprise package and cult FPL hero
 

Forgotten man?

How come he dint figure in MF?

Is he another crock?

Looked decent in few times he’s come on
 
Forgotten man?

How come he dint figure in MF?

Is he another crock?

Looked decent in few times he’s come on
Sounds like he’s got a knee issue so he fits in nicely with all the other players with knee issues that we’ve got.
 
Sounds like he’s got a knee issue so he fits in nicely with all the other players with knee issues that we’ve got.

Knee issues, hammy's.

Nothing to see here, it's probably the Prince with the sniper rifle at shirecliffe.
 
Injured again? I always felt he deserved a run in the team but how many minutes has he played? (4 years)

New contract is looking bizarre and a waste of wages.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom