Charlieblade
Well-Known Member
Excuse me for stating the blindingly obvious, and for playing devils advocate a bit too.
Every player presents a different physiological and anatomical profile. They are mostly different ages and from differing backgrounds in sporting profiles.
The PH method follows the Wilder belief that training effort and standards should mirror that expected in competitive matches. It’s possible that the PH method is more severe and some responsibility might lay with him for that reason.
Given their very disparate physiology, it it also possible that some bodies are more vulnerable than others. Maybe the aspiration held by PH for supreme fitness is a step too far for many players?
While there seems to be almost universal approval from players, most of them say the enjoy training and coming in to work every day, the standards expected of individuals could be inappropriate for them personally.
Are they suffering because of a natural aspiration for being part of a successful squad built on a team ethos similar to the military dependence on each member of the team. No one wants to let the team down, so they push themselves too hard!
There are core players of a similar disposition to each other, but also many polar opposites. Compare the style and effort seen in the likes of Osborn and Berge for example. Perhaps Wilder went as far as possible with physical improvements, and Heckinbottom is trying to take that a stage further?
I am fairly sure that medical and conditioning staff must measure each individual, and assess them as individuals. Collectively they could just be worn out by a rigorous regime that the players enjoy, and their competitive instincts take over.
End result is anatomical parts wearing out, because the human body is unique to each player, but the team drive and standards are not achievable collectively, however much they enjoy being a part of it.
Sorry if it’s a long read.
Every player presents a different physiological and anatomical profile. They are mostly different ages and from differing backgrounds in sporting profiles.
The PH method follows the Wilder belief that training effort and standards should mirror that expected in competitive matches. It’s possible that the PH method is more severe and some responsibility might lay with him for that reason.
Given their very disparate physiology, it it also possible that some bodies are more vulnerable than others. Maybe the aspiration held by PH for supreme fitness is a step too far for many players?
While there seems to be almost universal approval from players, most of them say the enjoy training and coming in to work every day, the standards expected of individuals could be inappropriate for them personally.
Are they suffering because of a natural aspiration for being part of a successful squad built on a team ethos similar to the military dependence on each member of the team. No one wants to let the team down, so they push themselves too hard!
There are core players of a similar disposition to each other, but also many polar opposites. Compare the style and effort seen in the likes of Osborn and Berge for example. Perhaps Wilder went as far as possible with physical improvements, and Heckinbottom is trying to take that a stage further?
I am fairly sure that medical and conditioning staff must measure each individual, and assess them as individuals. Collectively they could just be worn out by a rigorous regime that the players enjoy, and their competitive instincts take over.
End result is anatomical parts wearing out, because the human body is unique to each player, but the team drive and standards are not achievable collectively, however much they enjoy being a part of it.
Sorry if it’s a long read.