Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Ok I'm being a smart arse, but do we need him? Or even his type of player?
You will realise just how much [over a season and against different opposition] when he's not there.Ok I'm being a smart arse, but do we need him? Or even his type of player?
I do think you cannot suggest people get stuck with positions too much (I agree by the way) but then keep suggesting the fixed vision you have of Monty. Monty was 10x the player of Doyle. He had the footballer eked out of him because managers saw the 'Stopper' in him as more valuable to them.Absolutely Boo. There is far too much obsession with formations and roles.
Midfielder - the clue is in the title. You keep the ball you pass it with purpose. If the other side have it you press and suffocate the life out of them. Bullocks to nonsense like AM and DM. It's the Montgomery job description - no talent needed. A licence to do half a job; A charter for shadow-chasers. We are told we only miss them when they're gone. I don't miss Monty one jot and I won't miss Doyle.
Down with this sort of thing.
Monty was 10x the player of Doyle.
Did you honestly keep a straight face when typing this?
Monty with his laces tied together and wearing a blindfold would still be better than this 3rd division (some with potential agreed) squad.
Did you honestly keep a straight face when typing this?
It's the Montgomery job description - no talent needed. A licence to do half a job; A charter for shadow-chasers.
Ok I'm being a smart arse, but do we need him? Or even his type of player?
Couldn't agree more.It is a myth to think you need a deep lying midfield player in every team.
All that type of player does is protect "poor" defenders.
If everyone did their job properly then that type of player is not needed. 2 CH's with pace also negates that type of player.
UTB
Couldn't agree more.
Has this debate changed into a Monty vs Doyle one? Wow, even I'd choose Doyle.
I don't believe he covers more ground then scougall,holt and reed.Doyle has the best engine in the team despite his age. He is the best talker and leader in the team. He covers more ground than anyone in the team. He is the most agressive and best tackler in the team. The best fighter in the team.
When we don't need all those qualities we don't need him. OK he's fairly limited with the ball but we have players who are limited in all those areas mentioned above amongst our set of lightweight look-alikes.
Monty doing a credible Pele impersonation. Who'd have thunk it
The main reason we kept a clean sheet is basically the other team didn't score
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?