RedandWhite
Active Member
If the club have another option that could sign before Thursday who they know will be better I'd take it. But thats highly unlikely. Wait until the summer and if he's not gotten out of this poor form, i'd consider selling.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fuck me. Are you serious? They didn't give him away. And what would it matter if they did? It's 3 years ago and irrelevant.
Two possible factors -- Fleck signed a 4-year contract 15 months ago
- 4m is absolutely bob all for a top Championship midfielder in the prime of his career
- this would cripple our midfield
- would he really improve West Ham that much anyway?
This sounds like utter nonsense to me...
Two possible factors -
1. Leaked to press to encourage other teams to start a bidding war.
2. Leaked to press to get client new improved contract (despite only signing four year one recently we know what players are like)
They have Noble and Rice ahead of him, Wilshere to return...he simply wouldn't be anything more than a bit part player.
Is he replaceable? Yes I believe he is, but not right now.
deary me
im optimistic , but I think 4m is amazing for someone Coventry gave away 309 months ago
12m ,,,,, on fifa maybe
so whats your current valuation of Fleck thenFuck me. Are you serious? They didn't give him away. And what would it matter if they did? It's 3 years ago and irrelevant.
Can he play as a left sided box to box midfielder?£4m + Caroll
so whats your current valuation of Fleck then
12m is what youd only get on fifa 19
4m is double his valueHe's quality, still WELL within contract, it's January, Coventry made a mistake, that's doesn't mean United should too and ****Ham are a Premiership club with the funds to spend. United should be asking double figures. Simple as that IMO.
He'd be hard to replace with a full summer to think about, 2 days at the back of January? Impossible.£4m is a shocking fee, £14m is a bad deal as we can’t replace him.![]()
Shut up thick fucker4m is double his value
I hope you're on the wind up and not really that stupid.4m is double his value
come on then what you reckon his value isShut up thick fucker
The one and only explanation for accepting £4m would be the presence of a release clause.
But there's no reason there should be one. We were in a very strong position when he signed his new deal, in no position to be shafted to that extent, like with Kevin McDonald and his 250k.
Obviously £2mil. It's still 1980 after all in your house.come on then what you reckon his value is
in the real world
4m is double his value
The one and only explanation for accepting £4m would be the presence of a release clause.