FANS FORUM Thread

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Some pretty balanced views there. But the fact is we are in the prem and not league 1and it is the actions of PA not KM that have avoided trying to cash in short term and invest to stay there. As he says it would be in his financial interest to sell out now as KM planned but has chosen to follow his prem league passion. The days of KM putting his hand in his pocket are long gone and PA has said judge me by my actions not words. Time to get behind the Prince and for Kevin to leave gracefully.

If you look at the court ruling, there was an agreement between the two parties to match funding equally. On a number occasions the Prince failed to cough up the required cash while McCabe did.

As for Kev "leaving gracefully", I am all for it if his legal advisers see no grounds for an appeal. If they do not see grounds for an appeal, he will step aside. But remember, he's seen two major court decisions related to our club reversed in recent years. In hindsight should Ched have accepted his sentence gracefully and not appealed? Or should we have not pursued compensation from the Tevez case?

If Kev is given advice that the ruling could be unsound, I'm not going to slag him off if he appeals. But for me, it's doubtful than an appeal will be filed as the ruling seems pretty conclusive.
 



Son in law seemed very happy last night. Princess Latifa plays football and has already trained with the women’s squad. Looks like a fantastic and exciting opportunity for both of them.

Where abouts in Sheffield will they be living. I hope they don't mis-interpret Manor as being some area with houses for landed gentry!
 
Providing his daughter and son in law agreed to it and are happy with it 😉
They’re not too happy, wanted to rent our back room (with the en-suite) but told them only the front room was available....not happy at all
 
Quite simply it’s a poor fit with anything liberal and secular, and probably with mainstream Islam too. But a bloke in a hoodie who obsesses over sport and wants his daughter involved in a woman’s football team... It’s hardly the stuff of religious fundamentalism.

We can’t infer his views and intentions entirely from his Saudi heritage or family. If we judge him by his actions so far, and do so in future, that’s ok with me. If we get to stage where we’re somehow becoming tied to the Saudi regime rather than him individually, I’ll start to worry. But as it stands he’s just a sports geek with a few quid.

Judging him by his actions means just that.

Man City are owned by whabbists i.e. UAE

I think people are being a bit daft worrying about that sort of thing. If Prince was a strict adherent to it, then he wouldn't even be here.
 
Thanks CK, sounds like a good night and very reassuring all round.
One thing I’m struggling with a bit is how IPA is hoping to bring in more money through increased sponsorship?
We’ve just signed up for new long-term “record breaking” sponsorship deals haven’t we?
What else is there left to be sponsored? Injury time again maybe?
Did anybody raise this question at the forum?

No, that question wasn't asked.

We have a new shirt sponsor who paid a lot of money (relative to our previous deals) and I'm sure will remain prominent at the club for the next few years. But as bromtom suggests that doesn't mean we can't have other sponsors, and plenty of current sponsorship deals will be running out in the near future.
 
Foxy respects the clubs requests and even if it's in the public domain he's not updating on his forum....his choice. He won't want to lose the clubs respect for him and the forum.

In the very 1st post of the thread, Foxy says "feel free to paste the tweets in here for me". All Bladesman has done is pasted somebody elses.
 
Some people really need to look into how people live in the middle east.

It's almost as if I'm reading the comments section of a Daily Mail article.
Can't see anyone trashing HRH for being from the Middle East. Most people have said that they will judge him on his actions, nothing more
 
In the very 1st post of the thread, Foxy says "feel free to paste the tweets in here for me". All Bladesman has done is pasted somebody elses.
So was no one officially allowed to Tweet from a fans' forum? I can't remember that ever happening in the past. Any reason why?
 
If you look at the court ruling, there was an agreement between the two parties to match funding equally. On a number occasions the Prince failed to cough up the required cash while McCabe did.

As for Kev "leaving gracefully", I am all for it if his legal advisers see no grounds for an appeal. If they do not see grounds for an appeal, he will step aside. But remember, he's seen two major court decisions related to our club reversed in recent years. In hindsight should Ched have accepted his sentence gracefully and not appealed? Or should we have not pursued compensation from the Tevez case?

If Kev is given advice that the ruling could be unsound, I'm not going to slag him off if he appeals. But for me, it's doubtful than an appeal will be filed as the ruling seems pretty conclusive.

There is only one recorded incident in the Judgement of UTB failing to meet its financial obligations under the terms of the ISA, in 2016 (para 62 refers) resulting in a shortfall of £1.6m in funding. This was later rectified (para 76 refers).

For balance from para 45 onwards it explains a chain of events in 2015 where SUL refused to put any further money into the Club and reneged on an deal to pay a lump sum of £3 million into the Club preferring to drip feed it in resulting in a temporary shortfall of £1.3 million which again was later repaid in full, paras 51 and 54 refer. In short both parties failed to meet their obligations under the ISA for a time with regard to funding.

KM is legally entitled to pursue an Appeal and no one should berate him for doing that. IMO there may be an opportunity to Appeal regarding JF's interpretation of clauses 9 and 11 of the ISA. That will depend on arguments being formulated to challenge the legal precedent and case law relied on. If a further argument is pursued regarding potential fraud then unless new compelling evidence is produced that seems doomed to fail based on JF's comments in his Judgement.
 
But the fact is that now our Chairman is a 26 year old Saudi Arabian, HRH Prince Musa’ad Bin Khalid Bin Abdulrahman Al Saud. His young wife Latifa will also have a seat on the board.
Will the female hospitality staff be allowed to serve him?

And my gut feeling is that the Sunni-Wahhabi ideology is a poor fit with the values of the club. What helps are the positive comments from Jim Phipps, who is clearly an honest bloke (and also has religious beliefs that are a little alien to us).

Not sure what you're exactly trying to say with these comments, perhaps you could elaborate?

You're perhaps right to bring up our new chairman's age: 26 is awfully young for such a prominent and important position- what relevance is his nationality though?

You mention yourself that his wife will be on the board, who will be heavily involved in the women's team. Knowing that, why would you question whether anyone would be allowed to be served by female staff? In the 6 years the Prince has been around, what has made you think he would refuse to allow women to serve him?

And finally; what on earth does anyone's religious beliefs have to do with running a football club? (Either Jim Phipps or any of our owners/board members). Do you know that the Prince or his family are Sunni-Wahhabists? Does it matter? Did you ever question Kevin McCabes religious beliefs during his tenure?
 
Moving his daughter and son in law to Sheffield is quite a demonstration of intent. An action speaking louder than words.

We will see.

I hear that Kyle Bartley is on the blower to them about a 3 bed semi in Parsons Cross and some potential schools.

In all seriousness though it is a very big action and probably his biggest show of intent
 
How many of the people believing every word of the Prince also believe that we will soon have £150m a week for the NHS?

Some people are so gullible.

Take nothing at face value is my motto

I'm a little reticent that you would take that stance if someone questioned KM's words in the past
 
I'm a little reticent that you would take that stance if someone questioned KM's words in the past
It's my default mode and it applies as much to Kevin McCabe as it does to anyone else.

30 yrs of sitting in front of customers with the starting premise that they're all trying to put one over on, you pretty much makes it inbred into your outlook.
 



How many of the people believing every word of the Prince also believe that we will soon have £150m a week for the NHS?

Some people are so gullible.

Take nothing at face value is my motto


Precisely , it was a charm offensive and came across exactly as that.

What would any of them say.
We're sacking CW and bringing in our own 'coach' and building a new stadium in Tinsley.

I would still like to know where the money is coming from, £ 50 million ish. for the infrastructure, 10/20 million for more players in January, money to improve the academy .

Sponsorship was the only answer I saw.

As for the McBurnie deal, problem funding after the medical ?
 
You're perhaps right to bring up our new chairman's age: 26 is awfully young for such a prominent and important position- what relevance is his nationality though?
The fact that he's from Saudi Arabia not Sheffield will have a bearing on his understanding of the culture and traditions of the club.
You mention yourself that his wife will be on the board, who will be heavily involved in the women's team. Knowing that, why would you question whether anyone would be allowed to be served by female staff? In the 6 years the Prince has been around, what has made you think he would refuse to allow women to serve him?
Because last time he was at the Lane he allegedly refused to allow a lass to serve him, asking for a bloke instead.
And finally; what on earth does anyone's religious beliefs have to do with running a football club?
Depends on your religion. None, if it doesn't impact the running of the football club
Do you know that the Prince or his family are Sunni-Wahhabists?
Yes. They are members of the House of Saud
Does it matter?
Have a look at their beliefs. The believe in men and women adopting very different roles. I have no reason to think they will try to impose their beleifs on the club, but gender discrimination is illegal, regardless of whether there is a religious context. I would like HRH and his family to confirm that they will always abide by British law, including workplace equality law.
Did you ever question Kevin McCabes religious beliefs during his tenure?
No, but as far as I know he shared the broadly the same religion (or lack of it) as the fans. If Kev had converted to Sunni-Wahhabiism I'm sure a few people might ask questions
 
Precisely , it was a charm offensive and came across exactly as that.

What would any of them say.
We're sacking CW and bringing in our own 'coach' and building a new stadium in Tinsley.

I would still like to know where the money is coming from, £ 50 million ish. for the infrastructure, 10/20 million for more players in January, money to improve the academy .

Sponsorship was the only answer I saw.

We'll be profitable in the PL.

Probably the only wedge we will see this season is the 10/20 million for more players in January. There might be a smaller investment in the acadamy. This will be paid for by PL cash. In the future, the question of whether we are in the PL or the Championship will be pivotal. If we are still in the PL next year, I'd expect to see infrastructure improvements and more money for the acadamy. If we get relegated we'll have parachute payments, but if we stay in the Championship a few seasons we'll become a loss-making club again, with no Uncle Kev to bail us out.

But for now, the future is rosy.
 
Are you actually Kevin McCabe because (and admittedly I've probably not seen all your comments so apologies if I've missed something) you seem to be trying to find fault with any comment PA makes?

No need to apologize, would be very boring if everybody was fawning over PA. Having seen a lot of owners/chairman over the years, there has been some characters that's putting it mildly. I will wait and see where PA fits in that list. Amazingly they all had the same rhetoric, all promising the earth, moon and stars even KM, let's just see how it pans out that's the best plan.
 
The fact that he's from Saudi Arabia not Sheffield will have a bearing on his understanding of the culture and traditions of the club.

Because last time he was at the Lane he allegedly refused to allow a lass to serve him, asking for a bloke instead.

Depends on your religion. None, if it doesn't impact the running of the football club

Yes. They are members of the House of Saud

Have a look at their beliefs. The believe in men and women adopting very different roles. I have no reason to think they will try to impose their beleifs on the club, but gender discrimination is illegal, regardless of whether there is a religious context. I would like HRH and his family to confirm that they will always abide by British law, including workplace equality law.

No, but as far as I know he shared the broadly the same religion (or lack of it) as the fans. If Kev had converted to Sunni-Wahhabiism I'm sure a few people might ask questions

Bet you never thought you would be explaining yourself to Kanye West 😂
 
It's my default mode and it applies as much to Kevin McCabe as it does to anyone else.

30 yrs of sitting in front of customers with the starting premise that they're all trying to put one over on, you pretty much makes it inbred into your outlook.

Fair play.

I've seen a few comments in recent days about we can't take for granted what the Prince says. Of course this is true.

However some if these comments have come from those who previously would have taken umbrage with anyone doubting KM's word.

Truth is KM wanted to gain full control on the cheap to likely sell to the US company to gain as money as possible.

That would mean not only KM going but selling to a company that appears to work on the principal of making money for investors.

I'd rather try my luck with the Prince as it stands based on not only his words but his actions so far.

No new owner is fail safe.
 
Stone lane Woodhouse if that's your thing. Keep your dog on it's lead you don't know what it might find in the bushes
ad_215301935-e1470778661717.jpg

Shameless cultural appropriation
 
It makes you wonder why IPA didn’t launch more of a charm offensive when he first came to the club.

He seems to have won a lot of us over with his top bantz and explanation of why he doesn’t attend matches in person etc

If he’d done all this 5 years ago there would have been a lot less hostility and suspicion towards him
 
The fact that he's from Saudi Arabia not Sheffield will have a bearing on his understanding of the culture and traditions of the club.

Possibly, but not necessarily.

There are plenty of people throughout the world who understand our club's culture and traditions, there are plenty of people locally who have no clue. Nationality should not be a barrier for entry to becoming a blade.

Because last time he was at the Lane he allegedly refused to allow a lass to serve him, asking for a bloke instead.


Allegedly. Did this come froma reputable source?

Depends on your religion. None, if it doesn't impact the running of the football club

It depends on your religion? So some religions are compatable with running a football club or not?

Yes. They are members of the House of Saud

Last time I checked, the House of Saud was a royal family. While I'm sure that the majority are Wahhabi Muslims, one can't assume that every single member is. I would be reluctant to assume anyone's religious beliefs unless they made clear what they are.

Have a look at their beliefs. The believe in men and women adopting very different roles. I have no reason to think they will try to impose their beleifs on the club, but gender discrimination is illegal, regardless of whether there is a religious context. I would like HRH and his family to confirm that they will always abide by British law, including workplace equality law.

Again, like any religion, there are fundamentals, moderates, reformists and everything in between. To say "They believe in...." is to assume the individual religious beliefs of a massive group, it's wrong.

Use Christianity as a comparable example. There's Christians out there who violently attack gay people or target abortion clinics in the name of god. There's Christians that deplore violence and think we're all gods children. If I meet a Christian person, I wouldn't make assumptions on his or her beliefs based on their religion alone.

No, but as far as I know he shared the broadly the same religion (or lack of it) as the fans. If Kev had converted to Sunni-Wahhabiism I'm sure a few people might ask questions

The fact you don't know (or have to assume) McCabe's religion broadly illustrates my point: it's not important and never has been in the years he's owned the club.
 
There's loads to be sponsored. Premier League innit, probably get £500k for having an official moist towelette supplier.

I think it'll just be the local businesses getting bumped down the order, maybe a Saudi group sponsoring the academy?

VAR decision brought to you by Crab Airlines - any landing you can walk away from is a good one.............
 



All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom