Fan Services Supporter Survey

[de g.]

Supporter survey

We are interested to hear your thoughts on the content the club produces and ideas to help us improve it in the future. We are also looking to ensure we are doing all we can in maintaining and promoting a widely inclusive football club for all and the survey should only take a maximum 10 minutes to

www.sufc.co.uk

Good to see this kind of engagement, especially given the quality of output from the club in recent times.

My comment in relation to how it could be improved:

Some of the very best Blades-related content is independently fan produced: the S24SU forum, Bladespod, Dem Blades Fanzine, various Twitter accounts, etc. I wouldn't want this to change, and I think this content helps cement fans' commitment to the club.

However, it would be fantastic to see the club supporting this ecosystem, for example with greater access to players/backroom staff, exclusive content, celebrating and publicizing fan-produced content through official club channels (for example, Dem Blades and Bladespod both nominated for Football Supporter Association Content Awards), etc.

 

[Scarebus]

Supporter survey

We are interested to hear your thoughts on the content the club produces and ideas to help us improve it in the future. We are also looking to ensure we are doing all we can in maintaining and promoting a widely inclusive football club for all and the survey should only take a maximum 10 minutes to

www.sufc.co.uk

Good to see this kind of engagement, especially given the quality of output from the club in recent times.

My comment in relation to how it could be improved:

Pretty much what I wrote.

I also suggested that Roygbivs view from should become official club media, for added twitter banter, and Roy/Andrew himself should be employed as chief paper pinner upper.

 

[LoughboroBlade]

While I can understand why people might want to bring the likes of Beans and Roygbiv within the official channels, I kind of like that we’ve now got an array of excellent content separate and independent of the club. It has been done in the past though (there was a period where Deadbat had his reports on the official site for example). What the club could probably do is maybe provide some access to staff maybe, and obviously to give Roy plenty of advanced knowledge on all our transfer targets.

Did anyone else list Richard Cadette on the top 5 sources for United content?

 

[de g.]

While I can understand why people might want to bring the likes of Beans and Roygbiv within the official channels, I kind of like that we’ve now got an array of excellent content separate and independent of the club. It has been done in the past though (there was a period where Deadbat had his reports on the official site for example). What the club could probably do is maybe provide some access to staff maybe, and obviously to give Roy plenty of advanced knowledge on all our transfer targets.

Did anyone else list Richard Cadette on the top 5 sources for United content?

Definitely don't want to see them brought within official channels, as I said in my comment. But I'd love to see the club find a way to recognise and support them while not compromising their independence.

Think I had this forum, Bladespod, Roy's View From, @Blades_Analytic and Dem Blades as my top 5 sources.