CONFIRMED David Brooks to Bournemouth

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?


It's just my opinion, like I said I could be wrong.

He's 21 and not really done much in his career so far, granted he's physically a late developer, but usually the top level talent show a lot more by the age of 21.

I also think the choice to play for Wales says a lot about him mentally, if he really rated himself as an elite player he would have waited for England.
perhaps he loves his mum ? :)
 
Good luck to Brooksy. Given how he was knocked back in his career and had to work to rebuild it it's not surprising he's taken the opportunity and he deserves it.
Given Wilder already had an increased transfer budget and now has all these millions on top, there must be some significant incoming transfers on the way.
Don't really get the undisclosed fee bit when it's presumably very likely the fee will have to be reported in the accounts.
It's so other clubs don't know what we've got to spend apparently.
 
10.15am Sky Sports News - Brooks holding a press conference at Bournemouth.

Was a little surprised myself that he'd get that coverage at a young age.

Maybe they recognise that he's a star in the making?
 
The Star has it down as 15 mil, 12down and 3 mil in performance related benefits.

Wilder said: " personally I thought Brooksy would have been better off remaining here with us for another 12 month. But agents own players these days don't they.
 
The Star has it down as 15 mil, 12down and 3 mil in performance related benefits.

Wilder said: " personally I thought Brooksy would have been better off remaining here with us for another 12 month. But agents own players these days don't they.
Then the shit rag appears to know more than Sky Sports, who had it at £10m + £1.5m.

Who’s your money on to have it right??

UTB
 
Then the shit rag appears to know more than Sky Sports, who had it at £10m + £1.5m.

Who’s your money on to have it right??

UTB


we will just wait for the accounts then we will know for certain how much was initially laid down, of cause add ons will be still guess work......
 

But if Norwich got £20m for Maddison, we should've got similar for Brooks they said :tumbleweed:

It'll be interesting to see how Brooks does if he plays because I think Maddison has been great. I honestly didn't even notice him really last season apart from when he came to Bramall Lane, looks better than Graelish though and everyone's up his trumpet, and Graelish isn't playing Man U.
 
Just wait and see what Brooks does for Bournemouth this season.

By the end of it, everybody will see £12m for the pathetic amount it is.

I do think the Prem will suit Brooks...

But theres a reason Maddison is £8m more expensive at present.
 
I do think the Prem will suit Brooks...

But Maddison is easily £8m better at present.

Ability wise, he's already very very comfortable at that level.

Given more match experience and physical development he's going to be a brilliant player. Imagine him at the best level we saw him, but with additional pace and power. It's some prospect.
 
But will he develop the pace and the power?
He is a gamble as he does not yet possess the overall quality that Maddison has.
If he does we get a sell on fee, if not we have a good fee for him.

It’s all about opinions
 
Brooks starts for Bournemouth.

What about that, eh...
 

I really do wish him well. Wish we didn't sell him, but he was never gonna stay. Glad he's playing.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom