Coventry Fans on our forum

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?




Why are people so adamant that there will NOT be money owed? I'd imagine that it's very likely there is money owed All deals are structured over the duration of contracts, doesnt mean there are missed/late payments.
 
Why are people so adamant that there will NOT be money owed? I'd imagine that it's very likely there is money owed All deals are structured over the duration of contracts, doesnt mean there are missed/late payments.

Absolutely.

Even moneybags clubs like Man City, buy on the never never.
On a four year deal, I'd imagine the last installment would be due with one year left to go, i.e. imminently.
 
Why are people so adamant that there will NOT be money owed? I'd imagine that it's very likely there is money owed All deals are structured over the duration of contracts, doesnt mean there are missed/late payments.
Because people are mixing up amortisation with cash flow. The only outstanding payments to Coventry are performance based and yet to be triggered. Been confirmed by several sources that would know that all payments have been cleared.

Amortising the transfer value over the contract term is a clever financial tool that Chelsea came up with, it doesn’t relate to what’s outstanding for players.
 
Bit of a nothing club with a weirdly arrogant, humourless and bitter fanbase.

A group of away fans sing a tongue-in-cheek song about their unpopular owners and they've decided that we're apparently bitter rivals. It must be weird supporting a club that doesn't have any proper rivals. Villa and Birmingham don't care about them, and neither do Leicester.
 
Because people are mixing up amortisation with cash flow. The only outstanding payments to Coventry are performance based and yet to be triggered. Been confirmed by several sources that would know that all payments have been cleared.

Amortising the transfer value over the contract term is a clever financial tool that Chelsea came up with, it doesn’t relate to what’s outstanding for players.

It is absolutely NOT something Chelsea came up with. Spreading the cost of an asset over its expected useful life, is standard accounting practice. This allows the expense to be matched against the period in which the asset earns income. To write off a player's cost in one season, would be an artificial distortion of the reality of the situation.

What Chelsea did, was to move from the usual 3 or 4 year contracts, to 6, 7 and 8 years.

I'm not sure how you'll manage to blame Wilder for this accounting sorcery, but I'm sure you will find a way.
 
He's not fit enough to play central midfield in the premier league was chasing shadows last time we were there and he was a lot fitter than he is now

Yes, but he will be so much more motivated, by having the best fans in football blowing whistles, when the opposition get the ball.
 
He's not fit enough to play central midfield in the premier league was chasing shadows last time we were there and he was a lot fitter than he is now

Stumbled across an Instagram post earlier about this, and a Cov fan was adamant Hamer was a "Box to Box" midfielder, and we are playing him wrong. He kept repeating it too.
 
It is absolutely NOT something Chelsea came up with. Spreading the cost of an asset over its expected useful life, is standard accounting practice. This allows the expense to be matched against the period in which the asset earns income. To write off a player's cost in one season, would be an artificial distortion of the reality of the situation.

What Chelsea did, was to move from the usual 3 or 4 year contracts, to 6, 7 and 8 years.

I'm not sure how you'll manage to blame Wilder for this accounting sorcery, but I'm sure you will find a way.
I’m fully aware of what amortisation is thanks.

I’m not sure how you can argue that BlueCo/Chelsea weren’t the ones to drag it into the public eye in regards to football finance but I’m sure you’ll find a way.
 
Latest from Sky Sports News' Dharmesh Sheth & Tim Thornton:

Coventry are in talks with Sheffield United to re-sign Gustavo Hamer.

The midfielder has one year left on his deal at Bramall Lane.

Hamer made 132 appearances for Coventry between 2020-2023, scoring 19 goals.
 
Latest from Sky Sports News' Dharmesh Sheth & Tim Thornton:

Coventry are in talks with Sheffield United to re-sign Gustavo Hamer.

The midfielder has one year left on his deal at Bramall Lane.

Hamer made 132 appearances for Coventry between 2020-2023, scoring 19 goals.
12 - 15 mil ????
 
8 pages in and one of 'em finally asks the question :-

[IMG alt="Grendel"]https://data.skybluestalk.co.uk/avatars/m/4/4246.jpg?1782549880[/IMG]

Grendel

Statue Outside the CBS​

JoinedSep 19, 2011Messages92,184Reaction score46,934
Where is the evidence they actually owe any money?

In case of Sonic Attack on your district
Follow these rules
If you are making love, it is imperative to bring all bodies to orgasm simultaneously
Do not waste time blocking your ears
Do not waste time seeking a soundproof shelter
Try to get as f

1.5 pages later , no sensible responses !!
And quoting Hawkwind. Very strange.
 



You still owe over £5m for hammer , we'd be looking at maybe waving the debt in order to resign him. And you being in the financial mire can't pay and need to unload his wages. Welcome home gus. (Not that he ever moved away😁)
😴
 
I’m fully aware of what amortisation is thanks.

I’m not sure how you can argue that BlueCo/Chelsea weren’t the ones to drag it into the public eye in regards to football finance but I’m sure you’ll find a way.

You make a habit of moving goalposts, don't you?

You said 'Chelsea came up with it', then above you have known about amortisation 'all along".

I don't see how anyone can have a sensible discussion with someone who refuses to own what they said 5 minutes ago.
 
You make a habit of moving goalposts, don't you?

You said 'Chelsea came up with it', then above you have known about amortisation 'all along".

I don't see how anyone can have a sensible discussion with someone who refuses to own what they said 5 minutes ago.
I love how you’ve extrapolated that from a poorly worded turn of phrase on a web forum I typed on my phone while on a teams call.

I’ve worked for 20 years in capital purchasing, I know how amortisation and depreciation work, which you clearly don’t as in your example you’ve described depreciation of a tangible fixed asset. You would only amortise an intangible asset which is unrelated to income generated. The incentive for amortisation rather than depreciation is because the UKs Corporate Intangible Assets Regime allows Amortisation to be deducted from corp tax calcs, whereas depreciation isn’t (beyond limited capital allowances anyway).

Amortisation was not commonplace in football until FFP was introduced and accounts needed to be massaged. Regardless of what you think BlueCo were pioneers in pushing the limits of this, to the extent they had to change the rules to stop them.

Wilder’s still shit. Get him sacked.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: sam
We have already made a few big money signings including 22.5m on Rushworth that will be finalised any time now. We have players that are not good enough for next season, so bringing in Hamer would be a no brainer if the price is right. We would play him in the middle where he is best.
Problem will be if u only have 30-40% possession in a lot of your games...which you will...Gus is a liability as his defensive attributes are zero, he gives away a lot of fouls and he also gives the ball away a lot. He'd be good off the bench chasing a hame but hes actually a lot better in a top Championship side who see a lot of thr ball.

Obvious why you'd want him back though amd if he moves i for one will wish him all tje best and hope he does well in the PL
 
Why are people so adamant that there will NOT be money owed? I'd imagine that it's very likely there is money owed All deals are structured over the duration of contracts, doesnt mean there are missed/late payments.
All o know is DPD who used to have the ear of the Prince said all monies had been paid.
 
Amazing only cov have come in for our allegedly best player remember when leeds were said to be intrested 18 to 22 million ,only just stopped laughing at that one
This financial mire we are in ( allegedly) certainly having its reprocusions
 
You still owe over £5m for hammer , we'd be looking at maybe waving the debt in order to resign him. And you being in the financial mire can't pay and need to unload his wages. Welcome home gus. (Not that he ever moved away😁)

You are talking bobbar. Nothing is owed on him, if he goes he goes for better wages and we'll get £8m-£10m back.
 
Stumbled across an Instagram post earlier about this, and a Cov fan was adamant Hamer was a "Box to Box" midfielder, and we are playing him wrong. He kept repeating it too.

For once they're not talking out of their arses.

I posted this a couple of weeks ago.
He had NEVER played LW in his career until joining United.

Hamer played most of his game as a CDM with Coventry in a 3-4-2-1

1784535925394.webp



Flicking through the filters on TransferMarkt, it suggests he played 131 times in that position and 135 times as a standard CM (132 of those were at Coventry).
He never played on the left for them.

This is his position map over his career. LM, LW, AM & SS are all for United. Right Back and Right Mid are at Zwolle

1784536203384.webp



So it appears United converted him to a LM from a DM... but, his output at United is far better than when at Coventry (and that includes a woeful PL campaign).

1784536313457.webp


Here's his Coventry map

1785428169108.webp

And his United:
1785428234822.webp
 
We have already made a few big money signings including 22.5m on Rushworth that will be finalised any time now. We have players that are not good enough for next season, so bringing in Hamer would be a no brainer if the price is right. We would play him in the middle where he is best.
Oh great you're back, lovely 😉
 
Are you confident of keeping it tight at the back playing on the break?
If it backfires it would backfire spectacularly.
We've signed a man mountain defender in Amenda. 6'6" and rarely comes 2nd in the air. The Rushworth signing is about done.

We won't be playing like last season and having our whole defence joining in with attacks. Last season we had the best attack by far and also had the best defence, but it would be suicidal to play the same way.
 



We've signed a manager mountain defender in Amenda. 6'6" and rarely comes 2nd in the air. The Rushworth signing is about done.

We won't be playing like last season and having our whole defence joining in with attacks. Last season we had the best attack by far and also had the best defence, but it would be suicidal to play the same way.
I have nothing against Coventry even though your fanbase seems a bit weird but you were above average in a very poor league last year and even with rusworth and the big defender you don't have one single premier league quality player
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom