Blades vs Bury * PREDICTIONS POLL * Lets have em

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Blades vs Bury * PREDICTIONS POLL * Lets have em

  • 0-0

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1-0

    Votes: 19 11.9%
  • 0-1

    Votes: 2 1.3%
  • 1-1

    Votes: 10 6.3%
  • 2-0

    Votes: 28 17.5%
  • 0-2

    Votes: 1 0.6%
  • 2-1

    Votes: 7 4.4%
  • 1-2

    Votes: 1 0.6%
  • 2-2

    Votes: 3 1.9%
  • 3-0

    Votes: 31 19.4%
  • 0-3

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 3-1

    Votes: 21 13.1%
  • 1-3

    Votes: 1 0.6%
  • 3-2

    Votes: 1 0.6%
  • 2-3

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 3-3

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 4-0

    Votes: 6 3.8%
  • 0-4

    Votes: 1 0.6%
  • 4-1

    Votes: 13 8.1%
  • 1-4

    Votes: 1 0.6%
  • 4-2

    Votes: 1 0.6%
  • 4-3

    Votes: 1 0.6%
  • 5-0

    Votes: 4 2.5%
  • 6-0

    Votes: 7 4.4%
  • Any Other Score

    Votes: 1 0.6%

  • Total voters
    160



On Bury's form, it shouldn't matter whos out, but after the second half yesterday I'm a little reserved.
I'm going 3-2 blades win, I'm hoping we will have regrouped by Tuesday and the fuse is lit, ready to expload all over Bury.
UTB.
 
I am staying optimistic here despite the potential loss of some key players.

We have plenty of options in this squad, especially for Duffy's position. Scougs, Clarke and Chapman can all play in the hole, each bring something different and all look very dangerous indeed on current form.

For Coutts we could use Basham or Whiteman on the knowledge that we lose a lot in terms of passing but probably gain a little in terms of energy and tackling.

For Freeman we have Brown, but he hasn't looked great. Don't be surprised if EEL covers there, I think yesterday was partly an experiment by CW to see how he looked out there, albeit against 9 men. Basham is another option if Whiteman is deemed good enough to start in the middle.

I still think we will blow them away, honestly. 4-1 Blades (Billy, Clarke (2) and Scoogs)
 
I am staying optimistic here despite the potential loss of some key players.

We have plenty of options in this squad, especially for Duffy's position. Scougs, Clarke and Chapman can all play in the hole, each bring something different and all look very dangerous indeed on current form.

For Coutts we could use Basham or Whiteman on the knowledge that we lose a lot in terms of passing but probably gain a little in terms of energy and tackling.

For Freeman we have Brown, but he hasn't looked great. Don't be surprised if EEL covers there, I think yesterday was partly an experiment by CW to see how he looked out there, albeit against 9 men. Basham is another option if Whiteman is deemed good enough to start in the middle.

I still think we will blow them away, honestly. 4-1 Blades (Billy, Clarke (2) and Scoogs)
When did we bring billy Clarke in?
 
On Bury's form, it shouldn't matter whos out, but after the second half yesterday I'm a little reserved.
I'm going 3-2 blades win, I'm hoping we will have regrouped by Tuesday and the fuse is lit, ready to expload all over Bury.
UTB.
You mean the second half where we absolutely dominated a team playing their entire team within the width of their own goal and their keeper having an absolute worldy despite not behind able to refresh the players and missing 3 of our most important?
 
And if coutts,Freeman and Duffy are out what us your prediction,

That prediction is based on at least two of them being out, probably all three.

If one of Coutts or Duffy play (more likely to be Coutts) I think we might scrape another magnificent 2-1 win.
 
That prediction is based on at least two of them being out, probably all three.

If one of Coutts or Duffy play (more likely to be Coutts) I think we might scrape another magnificent 2-1 win.
Fuckin ell
 
That prediction is based on at least two of them being out, probably all three.

If one of Coutts or Duffy play (more likely to be Coutts) I think we might scrape another magnificent 2-1 win.

I'm still playing Virtual Football Fizio 2014. Is it worth upgrading to VFF 2017 Ricky Van Stompbert?
 



I'm going for 9-8 to us with both sides finishing 7 a-side after 3 from each team being sent off and the other 2 being abducted by aliens.
A tad far fetched, but after the last game, who knows?!
 
I've said 3-0 because we have quality in the reserve players as well who i feel can come and slot into the first team now like david brooks, harry chapman (only been used as a sub other than leyton orient game), ben whiteman, james wilson. Confidence is buzzing round the team and i trust in wilder to put a good starting 11 out there on tuesday, we were limited in changing our options on saturday with 3 forced substitutions remember which meant we couldn't replace a striker when needed (done taking a knock around 65/70 minutes) we won't be forced into substitutions on tuesday and we'll beat bury. Have rambled on a bit here i apologise
 
I've said 3-0 because we have quality in the reserve players as well who i feel can come and slot into the first team now like david brooks, harry chapman (only been used as a sub other than leyton orient game), ben whiteman, james wilson. Confidence is buzzing round the team and i trust in wilder to put a good starting 11 out there on tuesday, we were limited in changing our options on saturday with 3 forced substitutions remember which meant we couldn't replace a striker when needed (done taking a knock around 65/70 minutes) we won't be forced into substitutions on tuesday and we'll beat bury. Have rambled on a bit here i apologise

You have a good old ramble son. Best after a few pints of Henry Westons,
 
Yes, and I still think we have the quality to do better!
Anymore questions or or you happy now??
 
The form book would suggest 5-0

But (I keep saying it) we are WELL overdue a struggling below par display.

So my prediction is spoiling tactics parking the bus from Bury, seemingly happy to keep the score down
And us leading 2-0 and thinking why bother busting a gut. We stroll to a 2-0 win without getting out of 2nd gear. Can imagine some of the crowd booing being disassatsified as it turns into a none contest.
 



All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom