There are other things to look at though re: Brooks out, Woodburn in.
There was an element of risk with DB, form was poor when he came back from glandular fever, is he going to have any side effects. Doesn't look like it based on Bournemouths pre season but he left before we had a chance to know for sure.
We got money.
A good relationship with Liverpool can only be good too, if it gets us good players above other teams (assuming it works out)
Woodburn is a big name (despite what Wednesday fans say [jealous]) so it's a bit of a "ooh shit, they're a proper team, I might go there" type deal for me. It makes us look attractive.
I'd obviously, much, much rather have kept Brooks, as well as getting Woodburn on loan but I think this is an excellent signing in a stick or twist season.
If we get a few loans in and go up, we'll have more money next season to replace Brooks permanently.
If we don't go up, then things will obviously have to change, we'll probably be selling some key players, JOC and Fleck if we can keep them now and in the JTW, so again we're free then to spend some of the money on a Brooks type as well as replacements or we might buy with a new system in mind and we're not tied to a certain type of player.
We didn't have a place for Brooks really, so even if we bought a direct replacement, doesn't mean we'll magically be able to field an extra player.