Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
I have no fascination with him either but we do need some kind of attacking midfielder to help out Duffy. Holmes is not good enough for Duffys replacement.
Another one bites the dust
Another one bites the dust
Not really, he`ll still go out on loan.
Liverpool are just looking at him in the first team environment, like we have done with Slater, Smith & Norrington-Davies.
The loan window is open until the end of Aug, so plenty of time after the cut off for permanent deals (Aug 9th)

A bit confused with the fascination with Woodburn. He’s 18 and not done a great deal yet. Whoever signs him would be taking a big risk I believe.
So he’s not done a great deal yet and you think he should be going to an higher established club than ours?A bit confused with the fascination with Woodburn. He’s 18 and not done a great deal yet. Whoever signs him would be taking a big risk I believe.
Yet you think we are not a big enough club to take him
Chris Wilder and his team don't do risks. They will know more about young Ben than he knows himself. 'Due dilligence' doesn't come close to how thorough they are in player selection.A bit confused with the fascination with Woodburn. He’s 18 and not done a great deal yet. Whoever signs him would be taking a big risk I believe.
Chill out, it was more a figure of speech more than anything. We do need someone who can play in Duffys position to help him out. Holmes is not the answer.You say another one. Which others have bitten the dust given we’ve brought in our primary targets in goal and central defence and are still in for Gallagher and Waghorn? Hogan is perhaps one but no need for despair just yet.
Have to disagree with you there.I hate Liverpool as much as anyone. But I think the loan fine thing is totally just.
Some Blades don't despair because they NEED to - it's a default choiceYou say another one. Which others have bitten the dust given we’ve brought in our primary targets in goal and central defence and are still in for Gallagher and Waghorn? Hogan is perhaps one but no need for despair just yet.
A bit confused with the fascination with Woodburn. He’s 18 and not done a great deal yet. Whoever signs him would be taking a big risk I believe.
Maybe he just knows where the bodies are buried ?You don’t get that close to the first team of a top PL side at his age if you don’t have something about you.
Why?Liverpool are fools if they send him there.
My bad, I thought you said they'd be fools to send him here haha.Shit manager, and surely less likely to play if Grealish is staying.
Of course, we could hope that they will be more interested in his personal development in which case I reckon we would be the better bet. But I won’t hold my breath
Bit like HammondI really don’t get Liverpool insisting players should play.
Part of a players growth is being dropped when not playing well and spending time on the bench/sidelines.
It does a player no good at all if his confidence bottoms out and he continues to play.
And still I would see him getting more match time with us than Villa
Does 'have to play' mean starts or does it include off the bench in these agreements?I really don’t get Liverpool insisting players should play.
Part of a players growth is being dropped when not playing well and spending time on the bench/sidelines.
It does a player no good at all if his confidence bottoms out and he continues to play.
And still I would see him getting more match time with us than Villa
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?