CONFIRMED Andre Brooks sold to Norwich

[Dan Emery]

looking like a good deal for the blades on this one

On what basis? We get rid of one of our top 3 performers from last season, we weaken the squad, don't replace him and the fee disappears never to be seen again. Win, win for everyone at The Lane!

 

[Houso]

looking like a good deal for the blades on this one

Saw highlights of their loss on Saturday and he set up a chance with a lovely bit of skill. Far too early to be crowing.

 

[Tarqs]

looking like a good deal for the blades on this one

Yep, we've barely created a chance in 2 games.

Cracking deal.

 

[Torrix1889]

looking like a good deal for the blades on this one

Early days obviously but the table doesn't lie, even at this stage, Norwich played 2, lost 2 minus 4 GD. And the press say that their Manager is already under pressure.

As for Andre, he's gone, we move on. GLTTL.

 

[Berkshire Blade]

On what basis? We get rid of one of our top 3 performers from last season, we weaken the squad, don't replace him and the fee disappears never to be seen again. Win, win for everyone at The Lane!

If rak saki is 5 million then I think we did well to get 8 mill for Brooks both much of a muchness for me

Early days obviously but the table doesn't lie, even at this stage, Norwich played 2, lost 2 minus 4 GD. And the press say that their Manager is already under pressure.

As for Andre, he's gone, we move on. GLTTL.

I don't rate Brooks as anything other more than a good Championship option but I think that's a little simplistic! Their fans say he's been one of the better parts of their early efforts

 

[Dan Emery]

I appreciate you dont rate Brooks but it's only a good deal if the money is reinvested in the playing squad. Otherwise you're weakening the squad/team with absolutely zero benefit.

 

[bertieblade]

If you have o/heads to pay, monies have to be attributed to keeping the business solvent.
Great if the owners are agreeable to keep funding it but any business has to be self funding