Alex pearce and dan seabourne,blades targets ?

[bladeinspain2]

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,12876_6638213,00.html
ACCORDING TO SKY SOURCES

 

[SteelCity Blade]

But the question is.......who got in there first???? You or me?

 

[bladeinspain2]

not bothered lol, the real question is: are they any good and is it true ?

 

[SteelCity Blade]

Pearce is good, I know nothing about the other lad. I doubt there is much truth in it. I cant see Reading parting with Pearce without a reasonable fee as he gets games there. Seaborne (by the looks of things) hasnt been at Southampton that long.

I think its a story to fill web space personally.....we'll see.

 

[Yossarian]

Alex Pearce is actually a decent enough defender. I don't even know Seabourne. It's good we're targeting the right positions though, even if it is simply gossip.




Edit: But the question is.......who got in there first???? You or me?

 

[Russ]

Alex Pearce is actually a decent enough defender. I don't even know Seabourne. It's good we're targeting the right positions though, even if it is simply gossip.




Edit: But the question is.......who got in there first???? You or me?

Steel City won, by 1 minute.

Not sure we really need Seabourne now that we're Airbourne again...

 

[VolcanicAsh]

Steel City won, by 1 minute.

Not sure we really need Seabourne now that we're Airbourne again...

Oh dear that was a bad joke :thumbdown: :lol:

I think both would be good additions but didn't Seabourne only join Southampton in the Summer window.

 

[Ellisblade]

Pearce rules himself out: http://bit.ly/eY85Z3