Millhousesblade1889
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2018
- Messages
- 5,418
- Reaction score
- 10,736
B-U-L-L-S-H-I-T
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
B-U-L-L-S-H-I-T
Sounds like the previous owner really didn't do us much of a favour in the long run by separating those assets from the club.The Prince has a personal wealth of say £200 million and a football club, that doesn't own its own ground etc.
He then uses club income to fund the purchase of assets from McCabe. He now has £200 million and a more valuable club if he sells it. (Although the value of football clubs can go down as well as up.)
This money could have been used in other ways - signings, wages, improving facilities etc., if it wasn't being spent to pay money owed to the previous owner by the current owner. I don't see where this benefits the club.
Under the ownership court ruling he had to buy the assets .at a fixed fee ,shame the judge didn't rule on the two plots of land .McCabe had separated from the lane footprint .The Prince has a personal wealth of say £200 million and a football club, that doesn't own its own ground etc.
He then uses club income to fund the purchase of assets from McCabe. He now has £200 million and a more valuable club if he sells it. (Although the value of football clubs can go down as well as up.)
This money could have been used in other ways - signings, wages, improving facilities etc., if it wasn't being spent to pay money owed to the previous owner by the current owner. I don't see where this benefits the club.
You don't get it do you. I think, like many others, you are mixing cash up with assets.The Prince has a personal wealth of say £200 million and a football club, that doesn't own its own ground etc.
He then uses club income to fund the purchase of assets from McCabe. He now has £200 million and a more valuable club if he sells it. (Although the value of football clubs can go down as well as up.)
This money could have been used in other ways - signings, wages, improving facilities etc., if it wasn't being spent to pay money owed to the previous owner by the current owner. I don't see where this benefits the club.
He wrote off a huge amount of borrowing and split the company into two. He took full ownership of the assets, the football club was split 50/50 with the Prince. He then got paid (£38m) for these assets. I don't know the figures but I bet the amount he put into the club was considerably more than £38m, although some of the loan he also supplied the club were at an interest rate that was maybe more than the banks would have offered! For all his faults, you cannot say he did not dip into his own back pocket.Sounds like the previous owner really didn't do us much of a favour in the long run by separating those assets from the club.
However being a property man splitting the property from the club would have allowed him to cash in on the property value whenever he no longer wanted to dip into his back pocket.He wrote off a huge amount of borrowing and split the company into two. He took full ownership of the assets, the football club was split 50/50 with the Prince. He then got paid (£38m) for these assets. I don't know the figures but I bet the amount he put into the club was considerably more than £38m, although some of the loan he also supplied the club were at an interest rate that was maybe more than the banks would have offered! For all his faults, you cannot say he did not dip into his own back pocket.
Under the ownership court ruling he had to buy the assets .at a fixed fee ,shame the judge didn't rule on the two plots of land .McCabe had separated from the lane footprint .
I don't think they are defending the Prince, they're just calling out nonsense and complete untruths.I really don't understand all the posters defending the Prince so vigorously - he has not put any money in from his own pocket since the £1 he spent to buy the club - by owning the club, he has been able to use the profits from the club to buy assets, which he also now owns.
But as he had neither the ambition or financial clout to spend enough to make us relatively secure in the Prem, we are about to be relegated, with a squad of duds and aging players. The only person to have benefited from our two years in the premier league is PA
He will not be dipping into his personal fortune (I refer you to the court case - he hasn't got one) to spend money to get us back into prem.
He has already spent the parachute money.
You can flame me for this in a year if I am wrong - but I'm betting he will spend less on transfers than he brings in on sales and the players he brings in will not be high wage earners, and either young or barely Championship quality. Without a manager who can spin gold out of straw, we are more likely to go down than back up in 2022.
One English pound you say .wasn't he contracted to put in at least 15 m and I'm sure more went in after that .I'm sure one of our accountant savvy blades will be along shortly to put you right .I really don't understand all the posters defending the Prince so vigorously - he has not put any money in from his own pocket since the £1 he spent to buy the club - by owning the club, he has been able to use the profits from the club to buy assets, which he also now owns.
But as he had neither the ambition or financial clout to spend enough to make us relatively secure in the Prem, we are about to be relegated, with a squad of duds and aging players. The only person to have benefited from our two years in the premier league is PA
He will not be dipping into his personal fortune (I refer you to the court case - he hasn't got one) to spend money to get us back into prem.
He has already spent the parachute money.
You can flame me for this in a year if I am wrong - but I'm betting he will spend less on transfers than he brings in on sales and the players he brings in will not be high wage earners, and either young or barely Championship quality. Without a manager who can spin gold out of straw, we are more likely to go down than back up in 2022.
Clubs should be run with passion, set up to compete and win trophies, not as cash cows for owners.
Pretty sure he actually put the extra money in to buy MCB as Mccunt didn't fancy it...I really don't understand all the posters defending the Prince so vigorously - he has not put any money in from his own pocket since the £1 he spent to buy the club - by owning the club, he has been able to use the profits from the club to buy assets, which he also now owns.
But as he had neither the ambition or financial clout to spend enough to make us relatively secure in the Prem, we are about to be relegated, with a squad of duds and aging players. The only person to have benefited from our two years in the premier league is PA
He will not be dipping into his personal fortune (I refer you to the court case - he hasn't got one) to spend money to get us back into prem.
He has already spent the parachute money.
You can flame me for this in a year if I am wrong - but I'm betting he will spend less on transfers than he brings in on sales and the players he brings in will not be high wage earners, and either young or barely Championship quality. Without a manager who can spin gold out of straw, we are more likely to go down than back up in 2022.
I feel the figure was higher, JimPhipps may be the best person to put some basic meat on the bone, on this particular subject.One English pound you say .wasn't he contracted to put in at least 15 m and I'm sure more went in after that .I'm sure one of our accountant savvy blades will be along shortly to put you right .
He was putting 5 million a season in league one.and ten million.a season in the championship to cover losses and stop us from.going bankruptI really don't understand all the posters defending the Prince so vigorously - he has not put any money in from his own pocket since the £1 he spent to buy the club - by owning the club, he has been able to use the profits from the club to buy assets, which he also now owns.
But as he had neither the ambition or financial clout to spend enough to make us relatively secure in the Prem, we are about to be relegated, with a squad of duds and aging players. The only person to have benefited from our two years in the premier league is PA
He will not be dipping into his personal fortune (I refer you to the court case - he hasn't got one) to spend money to get us back into prem.
He has already spent the parachute money.
You can flame me for this in a year if I am wrong - but I'm betting he will spend less on transfers than he brings in on sales and the players he brings in will not be high wage earners, and either young or barely Championship quality. Without a manager who can spin gold out of straw, we are more likely to go down than back up in 2022.
Of course we will spend less on transfers than what we bring in. That's is how it works when a club gets relegated from the PL.I really don't understand all the posters defending the Prince so vigorously - he has not put any money in from his own pocket since the £1 he spent to buy the club - by owning the club, he has been able to use the profits from the club to buy assets, which he also now owns.
But as he had neither the ambition or financial clout to spend enough to make us relatively secure in the Prem, we are about to be relegated, with a squad of duds and aging players. The only person to have benefited from our two years in the premier league is PA
He will not be dipping into his personal fortune (I refer you to the court case - he hasn't got one) to spend money to get us back into prem.
He has already spent the parachute money.
You can flame me for this in a year if I am wrong - but I'm betting he will spend less on transfers than he brings in on sales and the players he brings in will not be high wage earners, and either young or barely Championship quality. Without a manager who can spin gold out of straw, we are more likely to go down than back up in 2022.
Would replacing BDTBL with a Tesco go on the asset sheet if we still owned the land?![]()
One English pound you say .wasn't he contracted to put in at least 15 m and I'm sure more went in after that .I'm sure one of our accountant savvy blades will be along shortly to put you right .
However being a property man splitting the property from the club would have allowed him to cash in on the property value whenever he no longer wanted to dip into his back pocket.
We were only a small step from being another Coventry.
If we are a promotion chasing team, we need to spend more than we make on transfersOf course we will spend less on transfers than what we bring in. That's is how it works when a club gets relegated from the PL.
That's not true though is it?If we are a promotion chasing team, we need to spend more than we make on transfers
We've got a squad that's barely championship level. If we sell our best and bring in cheaper (less good) players, we are accepting a future in the championship, or lower
A football team is more like a church than a grocers shop. It is about dreams and beliefs.Great shout.
So when we make losses year after year, to show our 'pashun', who funds the losses?
Are we back to the Money Tree again?
It wasn't his money though was it? He had to call up family favours to cover thatOne English pound you say .wasn't he contracted to put in at least 15 m and I'm sure more went in after that .I'm sure one of our accountant savvy blades will be along shortly to put you right .
It depends on who stays and who goesIf we are a promotion chasing team, we need to spend more than we make on transfers
Do you actually know the difference between PL and the Championship?.If we are a promotion chasing team, we need to spend more than we make on transfers
We've got a squad that's barely championship level. If we sell our best and bring in cheaper (less good) players, we are accepting a future in the championship, or lower
I’ve not seen many defending him. Just correcting people for talking bollocks about how much money he’s apparently making out of the club. I suppose people will always accuse chairmen as they don’t understand what they are reading/told.I really don't understand all the posters defending the Prince so vigorously - he has not put any money in from his own pocket since the £1 he spent to buy the club - by owning the club, he has been able to use the profits from the club to buy assets, which he also now owns.
But as he had neither the ambition or financial clout to spend enough to make us relatively secure in the Prem, we are about to be relegated, with a squad of duds and aging players. The only person to have benefited from our two years in the premier league is PA
He will not be dipping into his personal fortune (I refer you to the court case - he hasn't got one) to spend money to get us back into prem.
He has already spent the parachute money.
You can flame me for this in a year if I am wrong - but I'm betting he will spend less on transfers than he brings in on sales and the players he brings in will not be high wage earners, and either young or barely Championship quality. Without a manager who can spin gold out of straw, we are more likely to go down than back up in 2022.
you think Danny is bad Alan Biggs is practically suicidalAnd they clearly dislike him because of this. Danny Hall is still in mourning over wilder
One interesting thing to see with the new manager is whether the local media will, when the occasion demands it, write critically of him or ask difficult questions: with the exception of one or two journalists this has been off the agenda in the Wilder era despite ample scope for it in the last year.you think Danny is bad Alan Biggs is practically suicidal
We don’t know the repayment profile so it’s hard to tell. It’s very unlikely that we’ll be repaying at a rate that would tie a lot of parachute money up though.We’ve secured some loans against future income reportedly to allow PA to buy the ground off McCabe. If it’s the parachute payments, does that mean all or a proportion of those are going straight out to service the debt?
If so, doesn’t this mean our huge competitive advantage (parachute payments) in the Championship could be gone already?
If doing plenty of heavy lifting I know, but is this why the rhetoric about working to a budget and bringing youth through is the name of the game?
I’m only speculating but because we’ve effectively circumvented the “traditional” approach of a new owner buying the club (incl. assets) off the other, how the above works is critical for our future. Unfortunately we’re a few sets of accounts away from knowing.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?