Darthblade
Well-Known Member
Having sat and had an enjoyable evenings viewing last night, watching the mighty Blades smother rampant Walsall in kisses, it occurred to me that we're getting this all wrong and thought that I should seek some perspective.
We did great last night, played some attractive football in two thirds of the pitch and ok, we lost, but winning isn't really the point of the game is it ? These days its all about the taking part.
So I started thinking; why on earth do we need to sign a striker anyway, all they do is score goals and they're not that important in the game really are they ? Strikers cost lots of money and so its so much easier and cheaper to sign other players and they can "rotate" every so often to fill the role that some other boring clubs give to a striker.
So for example; we can use players like Baxter, Scougal, Murphy, Campbell-Rice, Reed, anybody really, to fill the role just for the game ....... a bit like we did "goalie wag" at school. We can invent "striker wag" and save ourselves a load of money. We could even let the substitute keeper have a go as well to keep them from feeling left out.
I'm sure that from time to time a midfield player, or even a defender will score a goal and this will be a real novelty and cause for genuine celebration, rather than if we had a really annoying prolific striker who was scoring, say every other game, that would just be boring wouldn't it.
So there we are, that's my suggestion for the master plan to getting out of the Division ....... I hope nobody has already thought of this because I think I'm breaking new ground with tactics here .......
UTB & FTP
We did great last night, played some attractive football in two thirds of the pitch and ok, we lost, but winning isn't really the point of the game is it ? These days its all about the taking part.
So I started thinking; why on earth do we need to sign a striker anyway, all they do is score goals and they're not that important in the game really are they ? Strikers cost lots of money and so its so much easier and cheaper to sign other players and they can "rotate" every so often to fill the role that some other boring clubs give to a striker.
So for example; we can use players like Baxter, Scougal, Murphy, Campbell-Rice, Reed, anybody really, to fill the role just for the game ....... a bit like we did "goalie wag" at school. We can invent "striker wag" and save ourselves a load of money. We could even let the substitute keeper have a go as well to keep them from feeling left out.
I'm sure that from time to time a midfield player, or even a defender will score a goal and this will be a real novelty and cause for genuine celebration, rather than if we had a really annoying prolific striker who was scoring, say every other game, that would just be boring wouldn't it.
So there we are, that's my suggestion for the master plan to getting out of the Division ....... I hope nobody has already thought of this because I think I'm breaking new ground with tactics here .......
UTB & FTP