It is possible to be against this extension without eye popping madness as you describe, and ultimately youāve highlighted why some on here donāt welcome this news.
Wilders reappointment HAS divided the fanbase, and made people resort to petty shots on both sides.
I was against him coming back, and an extension to that contract doesnāt change my mind.
Does that mean I hate him and everything heās previously done? No. It does mean however that I had concerns in the 92pt season, and despite being in charge for the vast majority of last season there were clear signs that his āsparkā had gone. We made every team look like prime Barcelona, and despite a run of a few results in the middle, we were largely clueless.
Itās not all down to him obviously, and he steadied the ship somewhat, but those issues remain this season as to which he is a part of.
Weāve reverted back to type when the Selles experiment failed, despite him having a total of six games in charge. Promotion last season was unlikely after the start, but our season was buried with ten games to go.
Weāve now shipped out a developing player in Brooks, another who is rumoured to have some sort of issue with CW and vice versa behind the scenes.
Itās rinse and repeat and hope for the best, and itās neither exciting or inspiring to look ahead to another now three seasons to see what happens.
But letās not tarnish everyone with the same brush that wanting a fresh approach somehow means weāre against the club as a whole.
I donāt want the club to fail and will support them regardless, but news like this reinforces that our owners are terrified of making the wrong decision. Theyāve looked at last season, now weāre arguably weaker and said āyep, thatāll doā.
As for CW, he doesnāt need to do too much. If he succeeds, great, if he fails heāll get a larger payout until they come back again next time around.