Team for Man U (Home) 🫣

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

SUFC Guy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2010
Messages
9,974
Reaction score
14,198
Defenders are dropping like flies now, but hope you make a full recovery Bash 👍

Will it be a last throw of the dice for Hecky? Change of formation because it's pretty obvious that this system is not working and the players are lower than a snake's belly. Only positive results will improve confidence so something has to change.

I'm going with 4-5-1 and add that extra body in midfield. Archer would have to play AMC.

McAtee, Hamer and Archer to feed off of and support McBurnie so they need to be energetic for this to work.



------------Wes

Bogle Anel Trusty Thomas



----------Norwood

Hamer Souza Archer McAtee



----------McBurnie
 



It will be three at the back again buddy, he won’t switch for a four.

Wes

Bogle
Anel
Trusty
Robinson
Thomas

Norwood
Souza
Hamer

McB
Archer



I’d go for what it’s worth -

————- Wes ———-
Bogle - Anel - Trusty - Robbo
——— — Norwood
--McAtee - Souza - Hamer
————- Archer
————- McB
 
Wes
Trusty Anel Robinson
Bogle Souza Norwood Larouci
Hamer McAtee
McBurnie

Anel in the middle where he’s been miles better. Trusty seems resilient so he’ll have to adjust. McAtee and Hamer to provide the creativity and goal threat to McBurnie’s nuisance. Souza and Norwood deep. After a couple of crap displays from Thomas and arguably an assist from Larouci, pace on the flanks might not be a bad thing.
 
Robinson can be a nasty bastard and I’d argue this team desperately needs a bit of that. We’ve looked very small and weak up til now.

Not saying put him in to kick people but this side needs some level of physicality and someone who can impose themselves. Robinson’s the only one available who comes close to that and as pointed out above, he’s played pretty well when given the chance so far.
 
For me I would pack the midfield with a bit more physical presence, just try and make us hard to break down. Maybe see Slimane in there, although I still know very little of him. It could be a risk but playing the way we do currently, we are just going to get walked over. A change in shape is clear and could be forced, we can't insist on playing 5 at

Gk - Wes
Dr - Bogle
DC - Anel
DC - Trusty
DL - Robinson
DM - Souza
DM - Norwood
MCR - Slimshady
MCL - Hamer
CAM/CF - Mcatee
ST - Mcburnie
 
If he doesn't change the formation and we get a negative result I want him gone, unless its a result of a refereeing mistake or a screamer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SLB
It won't happen, but I think we could do ok in a 4-1-3-2.

Norwood sits as the deep playmaker, with the 3 in front of him battling for possession.
We won't create a lot, but it might stop us being over run, maybe.

------------------Wes-------------------
Bogle-----Anel------Trusty------JLT
----------------Norwood---------------
--Hamer------Souza-----McAtee--
---------Archer---------McB----------
 
You’d hope Baldock would be back by then surely to add some grit or is he another that we wont see for ages
 
Wes
Bogle Anel Trusty Robinson
Hamer Norwood Slimane Thomas
McAtee
McBurnie


There is no good answer

Souza has fucked up the midfield dynamic (not unpredictably) so he can at least sit this one out. Archer has also been a total passenger. Good going that - two of the three big signings are the two who I'd single out to drop
 
Hopefully GB is fit and we play our best 4 defenders .

As we need to be looking for a clean sheet we may need to look at Norwood,Silmane, Souza,Fleck

So we can play on the break, maybe McAtee behind Archer
 



It would be very ironic if we stumble across our best defence of Baldock, Anel, Trusty and Robbo all due to injuries, all this is obviously if Baldock returns? I also would’ve liked Arblasters quality, energy and athleticism in the middle of the park too because we haven’t got any with all 3 attributes.
 
Everybody put the lineup with Wes at the top.
Yours has Wes at the bottom, i.e. kicking the other way.

Someone once told me if you have to explain your joke, it clearly wasn't funny ! 🤣
It was definitely also me being a bit dense
 
I'm hoping Baldock is back by man u, Bogle is a terrible defender!

Wes

Baldock-Anel-Trusty-Robbo

Slimane-Norwood-Hamer

Mcatee

Mcburnie-Archer
 
No-one's suggested Brewster
…..probably because he’ll get injured cooking his breakfast one morning on the international break? 🤔😁

Joking apart, it would be great if he was an option after the break, just for something twatting different.
 
I'm hoping Baldock is back by man u, Bogle is a terrible defender!

Wes

Baldock-Anel-Trusty-Robbo

Slimane-Norwood-Hamer

Mcatee

Mcburnie-Archer
I've given up on Bogle as a defender. But he's got (or used to have!) great qualities going forward. If we do play a back 4 (out of desperation), I'd have Bogle as RM
 
Wes
Anel Trusty
Norwood slimani

Hamer. McAtee

Archer Brewster McBurnie Traore

Let’s surprise the hell out of Man U. They might score a few but I’m sure we will score a load more.
 



It will be three at the back again buddy, he won’t switch for a four.

Wes

Bogle
Anel
Trusty
Robinson
Thomas

Norwood
Souza
Hamer

McB
Archer



I’d go for what it’s worth -

————- Wes ———-
Bogle - Anel - Trusty - Robbo
——— — Norwood
--McAtee - Souza - Hamer
————- Archer
————- McB
Your second set (4-4-2) is exactly what I want to see (even better if George is back).
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom