Ainsley Harriott
I saw this thing on itv the other week
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2016
- Messages
- 21,585
- Reaction score
- 41,095
What has Mike Ashley got to do with Newcastle winning so few cup games? Am I missing something? Did he pick the team?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
What has Mike Ashley got to do with Newcastle winning so few cup games? Am I missing something? Did he pick the team?
Maybe the managers disrespecting it and playing weakened sides? We all know the league takes precedent. I can't be arsed to look at who they played in those fixtures mindYou get money for getting into the next round of the cup. So I am not entirely sure why Ashley would be opposed to that.
If you take over a football club you don’t support, other than profit, what are your motives?A plan would be a start, please don’t tell me that Mike Ashley has anything better than a desire to sell at a profit.
If you take over a football club you don’t support, other than profit, what are your motives?
Profit certainly was the prince’s only motive, as he set out immediately on arrival.
I think you’re not thinking like a mega rich person with the first point mate. It’s about image and reflected glory. They’re not bothered really about losing a few million here and there if they can bask in the glory of a Super Bowl trophy or World Series or indeed premier league or European cup trophy.If you take over a football club you don’t support, other than profit, what are your motives?
Profit certainly was the prince’s only motive, as he set out immediately on arrival.
"The Sports Direct Crystal Peaks Stadium"Tbf everything else in the ground is sponsored. The bibs, the balls, the added time, the motm.
Just as long as its not bastard Door Deals, I’m not arsed.
Come on in MikeIt’s hard to believe that Sheffield United fans would like an Ashley takeover, given the fact that his only real qualification is his immense wealth.
Our fans spend most of their time moaning about perceived faults with our club, but be careful what you wish for.
I think a lot of them get into football overestimating the 'soft' benefits (improved image/reflected glory/new business opportunities) and underestimate the financial burden.If you take over a football club you don’t support, other than profit, what are your motives?
Profit certainly was the prince’s only motive, as he set out immediately on arrival.
Yes, agreed, they're mad to get involved. But it still comes back to the fact that if you aren't emotionally tied, your only really long term motive is profit. On those grounds, Mike Ashley is no different to the Prince, he's just got shit loads more wedge.I think a lot of them get into football overestimating the 'soft' benefits (improved image/reflected glory/new business opportunities) and underestimate the financial burden.
People who've spent a life time seeing rich rewards on their investments can't get their head around the fact you can spend £50 million and not even leave the Championship.
You can, just not in the desired direction.........glances towards S6.I think a lot of them get into football overestimating the 'soft' benefits (improved image/reflected glory/new business opportunities) and underestimate the financial burden.
People who've spent a life time seeing rich rewards on their investments can't get their head around the fact you can spend £50 million and not even leave the Championship.
"The Sports Direct Crystal Peaks Stadium"
Got a nice ring to it![]()
Or they’re moving Crystal Peaks to where Staples wasWe’re moving from the Lane then?
You get a lot more money for staying in the Premier League. That was the main KPI for Newcastle under Ashley.You get money for getting into the next round of the cup. So I am not entirely sure why Ashley would be opposed to that.
https://www.themag.co.uk/2019/10/the-truth-about-the-money-mike-ashley-does-make-from-newcastle-united-a-must-read/#:~:text=In addition to admitting that,is customary at many clubs.”Yes, agreed, they're mad to get involved. But it still comes back to the fact that if you aren't emotionally tied, your only really long term motive is profit. On those grounds, Mike Ashley is no different to the Prince, he's just got shit loads more wedge.
That said, I'm not keen on him taking over, but I can't really explain to myself why.![]()
appreciate that Bladesmanluke, though if i am being completely honest i don't know whether all these press rumours have come from this thread, or there is some real weight behind them. Now that Yorkshire Live are in the picture it does give a bit more substance to what i have heard. Let's see how this plays out.It appears I owe you an apology bongleblade . Whether this ends up coming off or not, you were well ahead of the curve on this one. Some classic ITK'ing from you. They don't make them like this anymore
Or to where BDTBL isOr they’re moving Crystal Peaks to where Staples was.
From my experience they expect more than just a top half finish. There not in the top category of big (not using the m word) with your Manchester uniteds or Liverpool's and they don't have the attraction London clubs get. They are as you say about middle but in football you can obviously finish above and below that expectation which they have.I don’t think they are deluded.
They are a single team city with a huge catchment area and a large ground.
If that were us we would realistically expect to be in the top half of the Premiership
You can never really trust any of them because we had one who supported us and was one of the most untrustworthy people.Point 1. Totally agree
Point 2. Which is why I didn’t trust him then, and don’t trust him now
Following that through, what glory have our current and previous owners basked in?I think you’re not thinking like a mega rich person with the first point mate. It’s about image and reflected glory. They’re not bothered really about losing a few million here and there if they can bask in the glory of a Super Bowl trophy or World Series or indeed premier league or European cup trophy.
Completely true but that’s not their mindset though - imagine being the first owner to bring a trophy to Sheffield United after so long I’d be a legend for ever - that’s the way they thinkFollowing that through, what glory have our. Owners up to now basked in?
The point being, that there’s no glory, profit, kudos in owning a loss miking run of the mill championship club.
The vast majority of prospective owners wil hope for much better than our current status, otherwise why bother.
The reality that most of them fail in their objectives and must be mad to get involved is another story. It takes a special kind of effort to make us significantly worse than we are today, so the upside / downside risk is favourable, whoever takes over.
We should be really childish and not them use the 'United' then it would just be called 'World'.How would this leave the "United World" setup? Would we leave this setup by the prince?
Not sure how interconnected it is I guess, probably just the shared ownership.
Ah no, there is a missed opportunity to drop in a silly name to see if it sticks.appreciate that Bladesmanluke, though if i am being completely honest i don't know whether all these press rumours have come from this thread, or there is some real weight behind them. Now that Yorkshire Live are in the picture it does give a bit more substance to what i have heard. Let's see how this plays out.
appreciate that Bladesmanluke, though if i am being completely honest i don't know whether all these press rumours have come from this thread, or there is some real weight behind them. Now that Yorkshire Live are in the picture it does give a bit more substance to what i have heard. Let's see how this plays out.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?