Never seen a player go past people like him with that poise, balance and awareness. It was obvious to me he would go and prove himself as a top premier league player; it was just a case of his body catching up with his technique. I found it staggering that a large proportion of United fans couldn't see what was underneath their noses. I'm in my thirties and wouldn't be suprised if I never see a home grown attacking player, developed by United, as good as Brooks again. I put on here that we we were selling him at least a year to early to realise his top valuation as a championship player; it hurts to see Howe reechoing this.If we got promoted this season with him in the team we'd be talking mega money for a future transfer. It's a strange penchant of United fans to undervalue our best homegrown talent when that talent has been under their gaze (Maguire, Brooks and DCL being recent examples). It's a lonely furrow extolling the virtues of these players, on here, but I'll keep ploughing it. That money should've set the club up for a few years, and bought them strikers and attacking midfield player that were desperate for now in the summer.
A key part of selling players is selling at the right time, when the maximum valuation can be obtained. It's a balancing act: If you hold on too long, ala Wendy, you end up not extracting the maximum value for ageing players. If you strike too early, you end up giving your top young talent away for relative peanuts.The one saving grace is he's gone to Bournemouth and will doubtless end up at a top club.If he'd have gone straight to a top club, we wouldn't get any add ons.
I'm also not buying the canard that he 'had' to be sold to finance our summer signings either.Wilder's on record that the Brooks money was not used for these signings.Unless this is contradicted by someone in officialdom that seems to me to be the only line to take. Last thing, why don't we just have one Brooks super thread instead of a new one every time he scores, etc?