VLYDONIMIR
Totus tuus ego sum, Maria...
So what level of criticism is acceptable?
Pratt maybe or dick?
I'm off before it gets really heavy on this thread.
#FlouncingLydon
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
So what level of criticism is acceptable?
Pratt maybe or dick?
He was tonightI have labelled it a stupid challenge elsewhere and that it cost us two points (Wilder cost us the other one). I think that’s fair enough criticism.
He’s a good player and usually makes decent decisions. He’s certainly not a wanker.
Agree with you on this...the biggest worry is who replaces him. A month ago we had the best midfield there in this division now two of them are unavailable until after ChristmasAlthough the replay makes the sending off look harsh if a player does that every game they'll get sent off regularly, he needs to learn todays rules and not how forgiving they were years ago. Unfortunately footy is well on the way to becoming a non contact sport.
So what level of criticism is acceptable?
Pratt maybe or dick?
View attachment 34141
That right there is a cunt’s tackle and we’d all be calling it for what it is if it were the other way around.
Get real. Blame Sky for moving it to a Friday night. They're the wankers.He stays on and we win that game
Now he's missing the next three
Any need? Doubtful it was even a sending off. He got the ball full on and the player's foot caught his trailing sliding foot. Far from dirty, certainly not deliberate, clumsy at best. Harsh as fuck post TBH.
Getting the ball is irrelevant if you then continue to recklessly hit the man with both feet. Nailed on red.
View attachment 34141
That right there is a cunt’s tackle and we’d all be calling it for what it is if it were the other way around.
Except he didn't go in with "both feet". Watch it again. 21:05 here. His left foot is high, but he gets the ball full on with that foot. He's sliding along the floor with his right foot, and catches the player with it (and I'm being generous, another view would be that he collides with the player with his sliding foot. So not even a foul!).
Not that I expect fairness from a reporter from The Star
NobHe stays on and we win that game
Now he's missing the next three
What a stupid thing to say. How are you supposed to stop yourself halfway through a tackle, hit the pause button?!
Shall we play a game of spot the other foot?
He also allowed Duffy to be pulled back onto the ground as he attacked their penalty area with 3 players around him that was the turnover that led to them taking the ball up the field to score.They got away with sneaky stuff and constantly complained at the ref,it worked for them he started letting fouls go.I would have thought he could hear the crowd who were not happy with him.Full blooded tackle that went wrong, right foot on ball, trailing leg does the damage. On the winning goal Jack nearly had his head took off with a high boot. But the chinless wonder if a ref missed. Btw Bristol are a moaning,diving, sneaky pull on the shoulder fuckers. I consider us to be a better team than them.
Watch the video I posted. His trailing (right) foot is clearly on the floor as he makes full contact with the ball with his left foot. He then makes contact with the player and yes, his foot rises up his boot to his leg. That is NOT a two footed tackle (as you claimed).
Bit of a twat's game posting a single freeze-framed shot to judge a (one of our own) player's intent when things happen in real time (as I said, I wouldn't expect any less from The Stir). I think the rest of us saw it in real time, and those that didn't, would at least watch the video before making judgment.
If I say what I think of that opening post I get a ban so I won't.He stays on and we win that game
Now he's missing the next three
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?