- Thread starter
- #301
Neither Ennis or Webster should have to issue an apology. They were hounded by the press for being high-profile, (well in Ennis' case anyway) females associated with SUFC. They were backed into a corner and responded exactly as they were expected to. If they chose not to comment then the Hatchett's of this world would have rounded on them and derided them as women......neither was ever going to win!
I'm not sticking up for them at all, I don't particularly like either of them (and didn't prior to Chedgate) but to hound them for an apology is a waste of time!
Heaton on the other hand is an interesting one and I wouldn't have expected him to get involved at all....but I suppose as he's a lad and a Blade he will be let off the hook.
I presume you're referring to me, unlike the Katie Hopkins etc of this world I'm not hounding them for an apology but think it would be a good thing for 1. Hypocrisy/ignorance of Marlon King 2. Their statements being unnecessarily damaging. Its not going to happen, so I'll leave that there
Nor am I saying that Ennis etc should have said nothing. 'I personally disagree with the course of action the club is taking and urge them to reconsider, but I respect people's right to an opinion and their right to make the decision they see fit, as well as the legal right of a convicted criminal to seek and be given employment in line with the law'. That would have kept the mob at bay and caused less damage for the club without damaging her IMO