All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
He won’t.
Unless dressing like a dick and winning a few headers qualifies as success.
Which for some, might just be enough.
UTB
Out there.
don’t lie 
..
Even someone as blinkered as you has to concede there's room for some doubt, surely?
Out there.
In plain sight.
Dem
Out of curiosity, at what point do the McBaffling apologists throw in the towel ?
How bad must it get ?
Or, more realistically, will the party line always be that he will “come good” ?
Eventually
UTB
Sorry? Is that a yes or a no?
: are the ones that will inherit the earth. The meek. They are not to be messed with. They believe that all things and all people will come good eventually. Even if we signed the biggest load of old horseshit in the world, they'd be the ones saying, "he'll come good" eventually, because they like to be ultra-positive about everything and it particularly suits them to defend the indefensible, just on the odd-chance, that they may be right. Then they can claim to have some superior insight or intelligence to the rest of us - which they see as justification for their position. You can easily spot these because they won't usually use facts to back up their stance on a subject, they'll leave that to others, preferring instead to give a "he'll come good" without any justification for it, other than feelings or emotions. It will be about "faith" and "trust" and "beliefs", not about facts.:
: are a nasty piece of work. They are only happy when they are contradicting someone else and making folks feel upset. They love nothing more than to start an argument about any subject at all. If you say, "Good morning" to them, they'd argue there's nothing "good" about it. When it comes to football they just love to have a whipping boy or scapegoat. These folks are basically unhappy with themselves and their pitiful little lives, so they look for something or someone to lash out at. Their views on football cannot be taken seriously, because it's not coming from a rational, objective perspective, it's coming from a position of anger with themselves and that taints everything they look at. They actually want players to fail, because it gives them a sense of pleasure to have predicted it. And if they get it wrong then they'll quickly move on to the next hate target. You can never win an argument with a . So it's not even worth trying. Just leave them to it and be grateful that you aren't similarly affected.: are a rational group of people. The thinkers. They don't jump to conclusions and they don't excessively love, or hate players. But, when they see things that concern them, they aren't afraid to voice that and actually they don't mind being wrong either. They are open-minded and fair and they deal in rational and objective thoughts. You get quite a range of views from the . It's not important for them to agree with each other. They don't love or hate someone because they have a different viewpoint to them. Rather, they find it interesting that people have differences and seek to understand that. We have some on here who are of the opinion that McBurnie on here, who, whilst not doubting these things may be a factor, still think they do not explain, or justify, why he hasn't shown more than he has so far. with a or a .
You could have avoided war and piece by simply stating that those of us that have called this one correctly are pissing off those that didn’t or haven’t !!I think folks fall into 3 camps about most topics, including McBurnie:
On one side we have the
The
Then there are the opposites to the
The
The
I think the majority of views on McBurnie so far though, fall into neither of the above camps. They belong to a group I think of as the
The
hasn't looked impressive so far because he hasn't had the service, or has been played in the wrong formation or with the wrong players, or that it's simply too soon to tell. Then we have other
Don't confuse a
I'd put myself into the camp of thinking it's early days yet, but the early signs aren't good. And the fact he behaves like an idiot off the field doesn't endear me to him. Not sure which of the above camps that puts me into - but I'm happy to hold that opinion until it's proven wrong.
Politician ?
good enough to spot em a mile off .
Politician ?
Grumpy child ?
Loaded questions, as with dodgy footballers, are easily seen for those of us with
UTB
And I am neither a politician or a grumpy child.
I think folks fall into 3 camps about most topics, including McBurnie:
On one side we have the
The
Then there are the opposites to the
The
The
I think the majority of views on McBurnie so far though, fall into neither of the above camps. They belong to a group I think of as the
The
hasn't looked impressive so far because he hasn't had the service, or has been played in the wrong formation or with the wrong players, or that it's simply too soon to tell. Then we have other
Don't confuse a
I'd put myself into the camp of thinking it's early days yet, but the early signs aren't good. And the fact he behaves like an idiot off the field doesn't endear me to him. Not sure which of the above camps that puts me into - but I'm happy to hold that opinion until it's proven wrong.
Try using that for Ryan Flynn...
Yeah, Priti Patel!
Didn’t I already put you straight in the other thread?
Don't believe so.
He absolutely hated and still hates Leon Clarke, even after his 4 goals against Hull and of course his double at the Sty. I wouldn’t take him too seriously, no one else does.
Go back, see how many people agreed with me to those agreeing with you and we’ll find you’re very much in a minority so I’m not going to waste my time going over old ground.
I don’t think he’s anywhere near got into his stride yet. He was unlucky to have a goal disallowed by VAR and he’s only started a handful of times. I’m still hopeful that he can turn it around, as with all strikers a couple of fluky goals can make all the difference, same goes for Billy going on one of his scoring runs.
The very same. Despises him.
That must mean your right then. If you ever bothered to read anything before you replied in a juvenile, aggressive, or unhinged way, you'd see that on more than one occasion I'd pointed out that I desperately want Mcburnie to be a success, not a failure. You on the other hand wont even contemplate for one second that he might not be the player we'd hoped for and even given time might never be the player we'd hoped he be. Go on try it. Admit there's a possibility you could actually be wrong.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
