Rodley
Well-Known Member
Simple one - be interested to hear people’s thoughts.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Warnock wasn't sacked.
Deane to Leeds was arguably worse, as we were the very definition of a one man team.
But given the mist of time, and the rawness of today I've gone for sacking Wilder.
What's even more depressing is that we've got some (not many) fans that campaigned for, and support it.
Went for Warnock. This one might be worse, or it might not, too soon to tell. Wilder has made a number of massive mistakes this season and frankly hasn't looked like fixing it. That said, he gave me some of the best times I've had as a Blade, is clearly a good manager, and I'm not sure we're going to get someone better.
Those who have seen it all before fear we know how it will play out.
Wilder hasn't left.
It's possible that he might just have bought a dozen more players like Fathi or Shelton, but giving Warnock some of the money that Robson got when we were in the Prem might have kept us there.Losing a Championship promotion specialist was madness. To be fair, McCabe threw some major money at Robson but it was the wrong appointment.
I was gutted when Deane left, it doomed us to relegation, but if what you heard was true - and I think it was - we needed the money to keep the lights on.I'm surprised at the numbers thinking Deane's second sale was worse than his first.
It' a bit of a myth that we were guaranteed promotion by holding on to him and Fjortoft - our form was dipping before they'd left, though it undoubtedly wasn't a positive move!
The moment we sold Deane to Leeds, relegation was guaranteed.
I think the poll more reflects the age of the respondents than it does the magnitude of the decisions.
I'm surprised an the numbers thinking Deane's second sale nearly compares with his first.
It' a bit of a myth that we were guaranteed promotion by holding on to him and Fjortoft - our form was dipping before they'd left, though it undoubtedly wasn't a positive move!
The moment we sold Deane to Leeds, relegation was guaranteed.
I think the poll more reflects the age of the respondents than it does the magnitude of the decisions.
I hope to god history isn’t destined to repeat itself.It's possible that he might just have bought a dozen more players like Fathi or Shelton, but giving Warnock some of the money that Robson got when we were in the Prem might have kept us there.
Yes, probably so. But my god, that was an incompetent regime running us back then.I was gutted when Deane left, it doomed us to relegation, but if what you heard was true - and I think it was - we needed the money to keep the lights on.
Just after Deano was sold Revolution sr and I watched the season highlights video. He scored or was involved in the vast majority of our goals. We turned to each other and agreed we were down. Of course, Bassett had already told Brealey that.I'm surprised at the numbers thinking Deane's second sale was worse than his first.
It' a bit of a myth that we were guaranteed promotion by holding on to him and Fjortoft - our form was dipping before they'd left, though it undoubtedly wasn't a positive move!
The moment we sold Deane to Leeds, relegation was guaranteed.
I think the poll more reflects the age of the respondents than it does the magnitude of the decisions.
It’s so close for me, Deano & Jan was a hammer blow, but you sensed the wheels were coming off a bit behind the scenes anyway and Gareth Taylor looked very strong in the weeks before.
Deano to Leeds was a killer as at that time he was a genuine force in the Premier League who other opposition teams just couldn’t handle. Always fancied him to bag a goal.
But this decision is a stinker and it smells like CW has been the elastoplast over the usual SUFC shitshow behind the scenes. Those who have seen it all before fear we know how it will play out.
If memory serves, Brealey had just taken back control from Woolhouse after Woolhouse failed to pay Brealey for his shares in the club as per their agreement. When Brealey came back he found that Woolhouse had cleaned the club out and that we were skint. We needed cash quick and that meant flogging Deane.Yes, probably so. But my god, that was an incompetent regime running us back then.
I had an appointment with Dooley to discuss the running of the club. I left that meeting flabbergasted, and gutted.If memory serves, Brealey had just taken back control from Woolhouse after Woolhouse failed to pay Brealey for his shares in the club as per their agreement. When Brealey came back he found that Woolhouse had cleaned the club out and that we were skint. We needed cash quick and that meant flogging Deane.
Brealey was tight fisted and desperate to sell us from about 1982 onwards, but I don't think he was incompetent. Woolhouse was a crook, plain and simple.
I'd love to know more.I had an appointment with Dooley to discuss the running of the club. I left that meeting flabbergasted, and gutted.
I never bought into the myth about Dooley - he was probably a nice chap, but he was no leader. What he did do was clearly get over the visions that the board had for the club. I could have cried at what I heard.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?