Wing backs? Baldock/Stevens or Bogle/Lowe?

[Gyp the blade]

Me personally would love to see Bogle and Lowe start a game together

 

[Katzenjammer]

Bogle and Lowe is the correct answer.

 

[Ndiayewillalwaysloveyou]

Bogle and RND next season

 

[Sheffsteel]

Bogle and RND next season

Agree

Right back: Bogle is much more of an attacking giving us a new dimension but Baldock is brililant to have as backup.
Left back: RND slightly better than Lowe but both are very good.

You know how so many visiting teams sit back parking the bus at Bramall Lane and we often to struggle to break them down.
I would think with Bogle and Lowe in the team then we'll create for more chances to score, so their tactic to "park the bus" won't be as effective.

Really looking forward to seeing both Lowe and Bogle start, especially at Bramall Lane, where we can be more attack minded.

 

[JT89]

RWB - Baldock if we're likely to need to be more solid defensively. Bogle if we need to break teams down or are likely to dominate possession.

LWB - Lowe

RND at LCB.

 

[sufcboy95]

Bogle and Lowe is the only correct answer.

RND at LCB

 

[Bell4]

We are lucky to have them all and when fit they give us so many options and opportunities to be flexible

 

[Deleted member 23679]

I’d go with Bogle and Lowe although Baldock and RND are both very capable replacements, which is handy as both Bogle and Lowe seem to struggle with injuries and it is sensible not to play them for 90 minutes every week

RND is also an excellent player to have in the squad as he can cover two different positions. LCB and LWB equally as well and to the required standard and these are two of the most difficult positions on a pitch to fill

 

[SwissBlade]

I like them all

 

[FriethBlade]

To say Bogle hadn't played for months some of his play going forward on Thursday was sublime. However some of his defending leaves a bit to be desired. Baldock is the opposite, excellent defender not great going forward and when you play 3 at the back the wing back has to be able to contribute more going forward. So Bogle for me.

Left wing back is easy, Lowe all day long as physically hes way better. I think Stevens legs have gone but he's a more than adequate back up.

 

[South Sea Blade]

Lowe at LWB seems obvious now that Stevens has lost all his previous attacking strengths.
RWB is more difficult. I would split the workload more depending on the opposition and expected possession stats. If we get promoted we will certainly need George's defensive attributes more next season.

 

[ATL Recs]

Bogle and Lowe is the only correct answer.

RND at LCB

For Clarke ?
For Robinson

 

[sufcboy95]

For Clarke ?
For Robinson

Both. He was arguably our best player before he got injured.
And Clarke won’t be here next season anyway

 

[3Cheers4Ramirez]

Bogle and RND. Best balance

Bogle and Lowe at home usually

Pretty certain no club in the league has full back options like we do. Keeping them all fit would be a massive factor

 

[Houston_Blade]

Stevens is done so it’s a choice of the RWB’s. I think it’s a ‘horses for courses’ approach with Bogle giving more going forwards and Baldock being more solid defensively.

 

[Frank the tank]

Bogle and lowe in the team woukd have got us past forest last season
Baldock has to be kept involved as he has something the others dont experience ,of both top level football and of achieving it that will be invaluable from now till may
Alongside egan stevens clarke bash norwood fleck sharp etc

 

[Bladesince59]

Not Stevens FULL STOP

 

[Berkshire Blade]

With 5 subs a game...

All of them.

 

[ucandomagic]

Wes
Bogle - Anel - Egan - RND - Lowe
Doyle
Berge - McAtee
NDiaye - McBurnie

Now that is a good side with huge potential to get better and better.

 

[LJBlade]

Bogle and Lowe in the games where we want to be more attacking.

Baldock and RND in the games where we want to be more solid in defence.

 

[bonobo]

If Lowe is back fully fit and continues to give us at least one creative outlet out wide, then I would stick with gorgeous on the otherside. Of course Bogle is ultimately the answer, but with his injuries, let's take our time. He will be a terrific impact player from the bench and having him start fully up to speed in the final 3rd of the season, will be a huge boost in the run in.

 

[Sheffsteel]

Wes
Bogle - Anel - Egan - RND - Lowe
Doyle
Berge - McAtee
NDiaye - McBurnie

Now that is a good side with huge potential to get better and better.

Agree....if that side hits top form, it's the best in the league
and I'd bet on us to beat Kompany's Burnley when we play them at Turf Moor.

The only question mark would be the omission of Norwood, as our style of play usually revolves around Norwood making us tick.
So maybe Norwood starting and Doyle as sub, at some point though we'll need to transition our style to playing without Norwood.

 

[Berkshire Blade]

Wes
Bogle - Anel - Egan - RND - Lowe
Doyle
Berge - McAtee
NDiaye - McBurnie

Now that is a good side with huge potential to get better and better.

Interesting to leave out the lynchpin of our side

 

[A_Bladesman]

Interesting to leave out the lynchpin of our side

The woodchipper is less active now but can become irritating, changes sides etc etc. The lynchpin is getting bored.

 

[PokerBlade]

Same as others, I think Baldock's the stronger defender. I also think we could outscore anyone if we take them on so it's Bogle for me. Bogle played that same little ball inside twice against Blackpool, got a goal out of one of them. I'd rather we went with that kind of creativity and not worry about defending so much against the vast majority of the Championship right now.

 

[Ned the Donkey]

Horses for courses.

Baldock is way more defensively secure than Bogle, but less of an attacking threat.

Everything seemed at lot more secure when Baldock came on against Blackpool, and that's what we needed.

 

[cahill]

We are lucky to have them all and when fit they give us so many options and opportunities to be flexible

Great point

 

[cahill]

Horses for courses.

Baldock is way more defensively secure than Bogle, but less of an attacking threat.

Everything seemed at lot more secure when Baldock came on against Blackpool, and that's what we needed.

Now I’m confused.

 

[CaptainMorgans]

If everybody was available, my wing-backs would be Bogle and Norrington-Davies.
Though, there's little-to-no drop off with Baldock & Lowe

Stevens, for almost 3 years now, has looked rusty and a shadow of his old self. Still a top lad though and he can't help his body giving up on him. He served us well in our rise under Wilder.

 

[Bell4]

Wes
Bogle - Anel - Egan - RND - Lowe
Doyle
Berge - McAtee
NDiaye - McBurnie

Now that is a good side with huge potential to get better and better.

Agree , good side

But I hope we don’t have to use it because our player of the division will be injured or the managers senses have gone awol