Champagneblade
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2010
- Messages
- 13,451
- Reaction score
- 36,216
Not sure we’ve waved convinced that much workout a four.
The original overlapping centre backs only fell down when O’Connell was never replaced.
Maybe we have replaced him. It sounds like Zatterstrom has similar attacking attributes.
I’d say the current personnel are far more attuned to this type of system if you include those we are closely linked with:
Cooper
Tanganga Mee Zatterstrom
Godfrey Peck Soumaré Burrows
O’Hare Hamer
Campbell
Henderson
Basham Egan O’Connell
Baldock Norwood Fleck Stevens
Duffy McGoldrick
Sharp
I see a lot of parallels. You actually have pace in defence, you have pace and creativity out wide. You’d create a platform for O’Hare and Hamer to have fun together without weakening us defensively. You have a poached up front who actually has some pace.
You’d be able to bring in Seriki and move Godfrey into a more central defence role if that was required. McCallum would be better as wing back than full back as clearly Burrows is.
The main losers are perhaps Brooks and Barry, but Brooks could cover left wing back and also left central midfield or even a role further forward. Barry becomes a good impact alternative to O’Hare and Hamer with less pressure to perform from the start.
The original overlapping centre backs only fell down when O’Connell was never replaced.
Maybe we have replaced him. It sounds like Zatterstrom has similar attacking attributes.
I’d say the current personnel are far more attuned to this type of system if you include those we are closely linked with:
Cooper
Tanganga Mee Zatterstrom
Godfrey Peck Soumaré Burrows
O’Hare Hamer
Campbell
Henderson
Basham Egan O’Connell
Baldock Norwood Fleck Stevens
Duffy McGoldrick
Sharp
I see a lot of parallels. You actually have pace in defence, you have pace and creativity out wide. You’d create a platform for O’Hare and Hamer to have fun together without weakening us defensively. You have a poached up front who actually has some pace.
You’d be able to bring in Seriki and move Godfrey into a more central defence role if that was required. McCallum would be better as wing back than full back as clearly Burrows is.
The main losers are perhaps Brooks and Barry, but Brooks could cover left wing back and also left central midfield or even a role further forward. Barry becomes a good impact alternative to O’Hare and Hamer with less pressure to perform from the start.