Cappy
wishful thinking
We won and Bowyer is fuming. Perfect
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Okay, while not exactly forensic, it's pretty easy to establish the lines on Perspective needed to construct a VARlite. He's On.
It may not be Forensic but it's not hard to follow the pitch markings and the mower pattern to see the perspective and then see Sharp's onside. It's close but it's clear in my mind. Also, look at the Lino's position. Couldn't be better placed.Sky said he was clearly offside, he looked offside to me, regardless of the unforensic effort to replicate VAR above. I've got no problem benefitting from a Stroud mistake, we've suffered enough of them in the past few seasons
The linesman said sharp was offside but he didn't think he was interfering with playIt may not be Forensic but it's not hard to follow the pitch markings and the mower pattern to see the perspective and then see Sharp's onside. It's close but it's clear in my mind. Also, look at the Lino's position. Couldn't be better placed.
The Bogle handball.When was their legitimate penalty claim?
See my post above #25. No part of Billy is Off-Side.
The linesman said sharp was offside but he didn't think he was interfering with play
'my own lying eyes' caused a chuckleI thought that at the time... well actually I didn't think he was onside but I thought it was really, really close.
Instead I was hearing Hinchcliffe telling me how blatantly offside he was despite the evidence of my own lying eyes.
Sure, but look at the image. The lino would have been wrong.The linesman said sharp was offside but he didn't think he was interfering with play
Hinchcliffe is a prick.I thought that at the time... well actually I didn't think he was onside but I thought it was really, really close.
Instead I was hearing Hinchcliffe telling me how blatantly offside he was despite the evidence of my own lying eyes.
On sky they freeze it from a different angle, and he is offside.Looking at that he is onside I'd say. For a start it looks to me like the pass has left our players boot, stop the action a few frames earlier and I reckon he would clearly be onside.
Hinchcliffe got most things wrong during commentary. Said Ndaiye trip was not penalty. Then both pundits said it clearly was at half time (which even a blind man could see) so Hinchcliffe changed his mind. Useless.Hinchcliffe is a prick.
The comments from the City fans are far more reasonable than those spouted by some of our own fans on other threads. I didn't think we were firing on all cylinders, but the all round performances are getting better as games go by. We are not a team who are going to score five, six or seven goals, but we have come back from a goal down to win a game of football. We should be basking in the warmth of that rather than picking spots off the players who got us that win.
You have to put your trust in the Justice system
Okay, while not exactly forensic, it's pretty easy to establish the lines on Perspective needed to construct a VARlite. He's On.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?