Couldn’t agree more. VAR is entirely a function of (i.e., it is prompted by, promoted by, made seemingly ‘necessary’ or desirable by) developments in media/technology and their disproportionate influence over how ‘we’ now think about the game. It is emphatically not a function of football. To me, this is where the principal debate should be.
The debate about fairness, and getting things right, is a valid one. But it is a secondary debate.
And no one understands this more than cricket lovers, as per
SouthEssexBlade , who’ve had to live with the impact of the decision review system on the game. The great surge and release of adrenaline/celebration that used to accompany an appeal for a wicket and the raising of an umpire’s finger, in a packed ground at a crucial moment during a key phase of play, has now become “Blimey, that’s interesting, I wonder if the guy in the truck with the TV will give it”, often followed by several minutes of sitting around peering at a screen while all that energy and joy is sucked into a big black hole the size of Hillsborough.