Sheffsteel
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2015
- Messages
- 14,016
- Reaction score
- 29,635
I think it's down to the administrators. If they wanted to clean up the men's game they could. There are plenty of high stakes/high value sports where you don't have to sit through extended periods of WWE/gamesmanship.
For instance, and I haven't watched it for 20 years or so maybe they're alll prima donna cry-babies now, but that always struck me about American Football. No matter how bad the call, they got on with the game. And there were a few bob at stake in those games. I think there were incentives in the rules for them to do that.
Taking it further, it's hard to think of another sport which suffers as badly as men's football? At times games are just not much more than extended periods of WWE.
Diving, arguing with the ref, rolling around, arguing with the linesman, time-wasting, arguing with each other, it's all a blight on the game.
I enjoyed the game today for all sorts of reasons, but probably the main one is they played football.
Agree, good point...however it's not just the administrators...it's the fans and whole historical culture of mens football.
Even now the ref will apply the rules and send someone off.
The opposition fans will always say it should never have been a red and the ref was incompetent, should be banned from the game etc.
Where the fans of the club benefiting from the red card always say it was definitely a red
and surprise surprise even the manager of the team benefiting will also say it was a red.
It's amazing that even with video evidence it's quite common for experts and fans of opposing teams to have polar
opposite views regards important ref decisions.
We can play really well but lose 1-0 to a dodgy penalty where their player dives
and many, maybe even most fans will say "we were crap" and demand that we should be diving too.











